Egypt to Build Nuclear Plants

Shogun

Free: Mudholes Stomped
Jan 8, 2007
30,528
2,263
1,045
Egypt to Build Nuclear Plants



Egypt to Build Nuclear Plants
Oct 29 03:11 PM US/Eastern
By SALLY BUZBEE
Associated Press Writer

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - Egypt's president announced plans Monday to build several nuclear power plants—the latest in a string of ambitious such proposals from moderate Arab countries. The United States immediately welcomed the plan, in a sharp contrast to what it called nuclear "cheating" by Iran.

President Hosni Mubarak said the aim was to diversify Egypt's energy resources and preserve its oil and gas reserves for future generations. In a televised speech, he pledged Egypt would work with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency at all times and would not seek a nuclear bomb.

But Mubarak also made clear there were strategic reasons for the program, calling secure sources of energy "an integral part of Egypt's national security system."

In Washington, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the U.S. would not object to the program as long as Egypt adhered to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines.

"The problem has arisen, specifically in the case of Iran, where you have a country that has made certain commitments, and in our view and the shared view of many ... (is) cheating on those obligations," he said.

"For those states who want to pursue peaceful nuclear energy ... that's not a problem for us," McCormack said. "Those are countries that we can work with."

The United States accuses Iran of using the cover of a peaceful nuclear program to secretly work toward building a bomb, an allegation Iran denies. Iran asserts it has a right to peaceful nuclear power and needs it to meet its economy's voracious energy needs.

Iran's program has prompted a slew of Mideast countries to announce plans of their own—in part simply to blunt Tehran's rising regional influence.

"A lot of this is political and strategic," said Jon Wolfsthal, a nonproliferation expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

Egypt is highly sensitive to the fact that Iran hopes to open its Bushehr nuclear plant next year, said Mohamed Abdel-Salam, director of the regional security program at Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies in Cairo.

"(Iran's) regional role, as well as Iran's political use of the nuclear issue, have added to Egypt's sensitivity," he said. Other Arab countries' recent nuclear announcements "added extra pressure on Egypt not to delay any more."

Jordan, Turkey and several Gulf Arab countries have announced in recent months that they are interested in developing nuclear power programs, and Yemen's government signed a deal with a U.S. company in September to build civilian nuclear plants over the next 10 years.

Algeria also signed a cooperation accord with the United States on civil nuclear energy in June, and Morocco announced a deal last week under which France will help develop nuclear reactors there.

Despite the declarations of peaceful intentions, there are worries the countries could be taking the first steps toward a dangerous proliferation in the volatile Mideast.

Such fears intensified when Israel launched a Sept. 6 airstrike against Syria, a country allied with Iran that the United States accuses of supporting terrorism.

U.S. officials have been quoted in news reports as saying the strike targeted a North Korean-style structure that could have been used for the start of a nuclear reactor.

Syria denies that it has a secret nuclear program, and says the building was an unused military facility.

Israel has not officially commented on the raid or acknowledged carrying it out.

But Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the U.N. watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, this weekend criticized Israel and the U.S. for failing to provide the IAEA with any evidence backing up the claim of a Syrian nuclear program.

Following a policy it calls "nuclear ambiguity," Israel has never confirmed nor denied having a nuclear weapons program itself.

Mordechai Vanunu, a former technician at an Israeli nuclear plant, spent 18 years in prison after giving details of the country's atomic program to a British newspaper in 1986. His information led many outside experts to conclude that Israel has the world's sixth-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.

Egypt first announced a year ago that it was seeking to restart a nuclear program that was publicly shelved in the aftermath of the 1986 accident at the Soviet nuclear plant in Chernobyl.

Mubarak offered no timetable Monday, but a year ago, Hassan Yunis, the minister of electricity and energy, said Egypt could have an operational nuclear power plant within 10 years.

Egypt has conducted nuclear experiments for research purposes on a very small scale for the past four decades, at a reactor northeast of Cairo, but they have not included the key process of uranium enrichment, the IAEA says.

Abdel-Salam said Egypt has extensively studied a site for a plant, at El-Dabaa on the Mediterranean coast west of Alexandria, and predicted a facility could be built within three years.

Outside experts were more conservative, with Wolfsthal saying a decade or longer was more likely. Egypt will almost certainly have to rely on extensive foreign help to build a plant, he said.

____

Associated Press reporters Anna Johnson and Nadia abou el-Magd contributed to this report.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8SJ31Q02&show_article=1
 
UN nuclear chief attacks hostile US claims on Iran

UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.

"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

"Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons ... they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon," he said, citing Washington's own intelligence assessments.

"My fear (is) that if we continue to escalate from both sides that we will end up into a precipice, we will end up into an abyss. The Middle East is in a total mess, to say the least. And we cannot add fuel to the fire."

The White House Friday rejected any parallels between its Iran rhetoric and the run-up to the Iraq war, after fresh sanctions on Tehran and escalating US warnings fueled comparisons to the months before the 2003 invasion.

"We are absolutely committed to a diplomatic process," spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters.

"We would never take options off the table, but the diplomatic process is what we want to move forward with," he said, calling it "unwise" to rule out the use of force.

His comments came as US President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have been sharply ramping up their rhetoric about Iran, leading some critics to draw parallels with the late 2002 verbal escalation against Iraq.

In recent months, Bush has predicted "nuclear holocaust" and "World War III" if Tehran gets atomic weapons, while Cheney has warned of "serious consequences" for Iran if it defies global demands to freeze uranium enrichment -- echoing the UN resolution that Washington says authorized war in Iraq.

Iran insists that it is enriching uranium only for nuclear energy and denies US charges that it is seeking the bomb.

ElBaradei has been vindicated in his pre-war belief that Iraq was not resuming its own nuclear arms program, contrary to claims by Bush and Cheney.

However, he said that in the current dispute, "we cannot give Iran a pass right now, because there is still a lot of question marks."

"But have we seen Iran having the nuclear material that can readily be used into a weapon? No. Have we seen an active weaponization program? No."

Merely "exchanging rhetoric" would not resolve the Iranian nuclear case, the IAEA chief said, adding that "the earlier we follow the North Korean model, the better for everybody."

North Korea has already detonated a nuclear device. But under six-nation talks, the Stalinist state has agreed to dismantle its nuclear weapons program in return for a broad package of economic and diplomatic incentives.

ElBaradei said it is time "to stop spinning and hyping the Iranian issue because that's an issue that could have a major conflagration, and not only regionally but globally."

"It could even accelerate a drive by Iran, even if they are not working on a nuclear weapon today, to go for a nuclear weapon," the IAEA chief said.

"So we can talk about use of force as and when we (have) exhausted diplomacy ... but we are far, far away from that stage."

Foreign ministry officials from Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States are preparing to hold new discussions about stronger UN sanctions against Iran, possibly as early as Friday in London.

Meanwhile one of ElBaradei's deputies, Olli Heinonen, is due to hold fresh talks in Tehran on Monday.

Heinonen clinched a deal in August for Iran to answer outstanding questions over its atomic program so that the IAEA can conclude a four-year investigation.


http://rawstory.com/news/afp/UN_nuclear_chief_attacks_hostile_US_10282007.html


:eusa_dance:
 
UN nuclear chief attacks hostile US claims on Iran



by Jitendra Joshi Sun Oct 28, 4:18 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.
ADVERTISEMENT

"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

"Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons ... they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon," he said, citing Washington's own intelligence assessments.

"My fear (is) that if we continue to escalate from both sides that we will end up into a precipice, we will end up into an abyss. The Middle East is in a total mess, to say the least. And we cannot add fuel to the fire."

The White House Friday rejected any parallels between its Iran rhetoric and the run-up to the Iraq war, after fresh sanctions on Tehran and escalating US warnings fueled comparisons to the months before the 2003 invasion.

"We are absolutely committed to a diplomatic process," spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters.

"We would never take options off the table, but the diplomatic process is what we want to move forward with," he said, calling it "unwise" to rule out the use of force.

His comments came as US President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have been sharply ramping up their rhetoric about Iran, leading some critics to draw parallels with the late 2002 verbal escalation against Iraq.


In recent months, Bush has predicted "nuclear holocaust" and "World War III" if Tehran gets atomic weapons, while Cheney has warned of "serious consequences" for Iran if it defies global demands to freeze uranium enrichment -- echoing the UN resolution that Washington says authorized war in Iraq.

Iran insists that it is enriching uranium only for nuclear energy and denies US charges that it is seeking the bomb.

ElBaradei has been vindicated in his pre-war belief that Iraq was not resuming its own nuclear arms program, contrary to claims by Bush and Cheney.

However, he said that in the current dispute, "we cannot give Iran a pass right now, because there is still a lot of question marks."

"But have we seen Iran having the nuclear material that can readily be used into a weapon? No. Have we seen an active weaponization program? No."

Merely "exchanging rhetoric" would not resolve the Iranian nuclear case, the IAEA chief said, adding that "the earlier we follow the North Korean model, the better for everybody."

North Korea has already detonated a nuclear device. But under six-nation talks, the Stalinist state has agreed to dismantle its nuclear weapons program in return for a broad package of economic and diplomatic incentives.

ElBaradei said it is time "to stop spinning and hyping the Iranian issue because that's an issue that could have a major conflagration, and not only regionally but globally."

"It could even accelerate a drive by Iran, even if they are not working on a nuclear weapon today, to go for a nuclear weapon," the IAEA chief said.

"So we can talk about use of force as and when we (have) exhausted diplomacy ... but we are far, far away from that stage."

Foreign ministry officials from Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States are preparing to hold new discussions about stronger UN sanctions against Iran, possibly as early as Friday in London.

Meanwhile one of ElBaradei's deputies, Olli Heinonen, is due to hold fresh talks in Tehran on Monday.

Heinonen clinched a deal in August for Iran to answer outstanding questions over its atomic program so that the IAEA can conclude a four-year investigation.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071028/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsiaeaus

:eusa_whistle:
 
Money quote:

UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.

"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

"Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons ... they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon," he said, citing Washington's own intelligence assessments.


Like I said previously, after the Iraq fiasco, I'll be taking the word of IAEA inspectors, over the word of George Bush and his minions.
 
kinda quiet in the war monger section of the board today...

:eusa_whistle:
 

Comment on what? That we believe in following International treaties and so Egypt is no problem if they do so while building Nuclear power plants? Or your second propaganda piece on Iran, who IS NOT following international treaties they signed and IS hiding information and nuclear construction from everyone?
 
Comment on what? That we believe in following International treaties and so Egypt is no problem if they do so while building Nuclear power plants? Or your second propaganda piece on Iran, who IS NOT following international treaties they signed and IS hiding information and nuclear construction from everyone?
What???? some more crap? that is strictly your opinion. you are just following the BUSHIE LINE
 
What???? some more crap? that is strictly your opinion. you are just following the BUSHIE LINE

What is not true? Do not do your normal drive by spiel.

Are you saying Iran is open and above board on all it's nuclear program?

If so I suggest you have a conversation with the UN about that, even the watch dog agency that wants desperately to protect them can not make that claim.

Are you saying Egypt can not be trusted to be above board on their program?

What crap? Be specific, or is that beyond your doddering old mind?
 
Comment on what? That we believe in following International treaties and so Egypt is no problem if they do so while building Nuclear power plants? Or your second propaganda piece on Iran, who IS NOT following international treaties they signed and IS hiding information and nuclear construction from everyone?



ahhh... so it's PROPAGANDA when you hear news that directly conflicts with your war-boner? I see. So, YOU have a better source that indicates that Iran is lying than UN INSPECTORS, eh? Funny, I doubt that you do! I guess it doesn't dawn on you how deja vu it is to hear you SO confident that Iran IS hiding nukes.... uh, this side of the Iraq invasion..


Eh, mr WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?


hehehehe... PROPAGANDA... why don't YOU post your source that PROVES the UN WEAPONS INSPECTOR wrong... THEN we can talk about Propaganda...


Somehow, I just don't think Bolton and Krystol are any more correct this time around than they were when it was time to whip automatons into war the last time we heard THIS EXACT SAME SHIT.... which turned out.. well, we ARE still looking for those phantom WMDs, right? OOPS... I forgot.. we are not because it has been admitted that you reacted to ERRONEOUS INTEL!


hehehehehe...


thanks for falling into the spike trap, dude.

:eusa_dance:
 
What is not true? Do not do your normal drive by spiel.
Are you saying Iran is open and above board on all it's nuclear program?
If so I suggest you have a conversation with the UN about that, even the watch dog agency that wants desperately to protect them can not make that claim.
Are you saying Egypt can not be trusted to be above board on their program?
What crap? Be specific, or is that beyond your doddering old mind?


Yes, it takes a real brainiac to see that the UN is just looking out to PROTECT iran! HAHAHAHA!

what an idiot.


I tellya, every time RGS hears something that does not mesh with his established OPINION it's either PROPAGANDA or some giant evil diabolical CONSIRACY between the big evil UN and whoever is the target of the day.


Target Du Jour, right RGS? If the watchdog doesn't say what you want them to say then they are OUT TO GET YOU, right?


:eusa_shifty: :thup:
 
What is not true? Do not do your normal drive by spiel.

Are you saying Iran is open and above board on all it's nuclear program?

If so I suggest you have a conversation with the UN about that, even the watch dog agency that wants desperately to protect them can not make that claim.

Are you saying Egypt can not be trusted to be above board on their program?

What crap? Be specific, or is that beyond your doddering old mind?

RSG: “Remind us again how Iran is NOT... working on the bomb. …


Your credibility in on the line, with this assertion. This is your statement from the other thread. The UN head Inspector actually DOESN’T say what you suggest they say:


UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.

"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

"Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons ... they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon," he said, citing Washington's own intelligence assessments.


Care to retract your assertion yet?
 
or... heaven forbid... post a source beyond Bolton & Krystol's wet dream?

:eusa_shhh:
 
RSG: “Remind us again how Iran is NOT... working on the bomb. …


Your credibility in on the line, with this assertion. This is your statement from the other thread. The UN head Inspector actually DOESN’T say what you suggest they say:





Care to retract your assertion yet?

I will stay with all the Western nations and the US that believe so strongly that Iran is working on the bomb that they are willing to impose sanctions on the country. And I will remind you that your beloved watchdog can not say they are NOT working on a bomb, in act all he can say is " we do not know" and further that we should just wait and see since it is 3 years or more away if they are.

3 Years is a very short time to be in possession of nuclear weapons if one has done NO work on them. But do feel free to pretend it is just the US and bury that head in the sand like a good osterich.
 
I will stay with all the Western nations and the US that believe so strongly that Iran is working on the bomb that they are willing to impose sanctions on the country. And I will remind you that your beloved watchdog can not say they are NOT working on a bomb, in act all he can say is " we do not know" and further that we should just wait and see since it is 3 years or more away if they are.

3 Years is a very short time to be in possession of nuclear weapons if one has done NO work on them. But do feel free to pretend it is just the US and bury that head in the sand like a good osterich.


I guess that's as close a retraction as we can hope to see from you, regarding your assertion that IAEA has said that Iran is building a nuclear bomb.

Its entirely possible that Iran has scientists and researchers who do theorectical research on weaponizing uranium. A research program does not mean their actually working on building a bomb, nor does it mean they're even going to get one. A lot of nations probably have scientists that do theorectical research on weaponizing nuclear materials.

Its a problem, but its an entirely insufficient reason to launch another trillion dollar war like it appears you want to.

At this point, its prudent to continue with aggresive diplomacy to make Iran's nuclear activities more transparent to IAEA.
 
I will stay with all the Western nations and the US that believe so strongly that Iran is working on the bomb that they are willing to impose sanctions on the country. And I will remind you that your beloved watchdog can not say they are NOT working on a bomb, in act all he can say is " we do not know" and further that we should just wait and see since it is 3 years or more away if they are.

3 Years is a very short time to be in possession of nuclear weapons if one has done NO work on them. But do feel free to pretend it is just the US and bury that head in the sand like a good osterich.


HA!

Isn't it funny how the dame guy said the SAME THING about the SAME cry for war when the SAME excuses were made to invade Iraq?


ElBaradei has been vindicated in his pre-war belief that Iraq was not resuming its own nuclear arms program, contrary to claims by Bush and Cheney.


sorry, duder.... I can't say that you are NOT sucking on a dick right now either.. All I can say is that I just don't know what's in your mouth right now. Your paranoid delusion should not be allowed to put America into Mid. East Cluster fuck Version 2.0 just because you want to look good for israeli zionists.


Indeed, why have to PROVE your accusation when pointing a finger will do.. Hell, you don't even have those big bad SAt Pics with images of "Mobile Chem Labs" this time.


Circles and arrows, right? Remember, the song's about Alice, dude.. You can get anything you want...
 

Forum List

Back
Top