Economy Grows Faster Under Democrats

Discussion in 'Economy' started by Toro, Sep 11, 2008.

  1. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    50,786
    Thanks Received:
    11,059
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +25,124
    Economic View - Is History Siding With Obama’s Economic Plan? - NYTimes.com
     
  2. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    Yeah, no doubt.

    Republicans cannot understand why drastic income inequity is ultimately bad for a democratic republic.

    That or they basically hate having to live in a democratic anything, which is, I think probably basically truer than my previous statement.
     
  3. Zoomie1980
    Offline

    Zoomie1980 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,658
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +128
    Post WWII Presidents are really elected by roughly 8-12% of non-ideologicial independents that politically sit right in the center of the spectrum. That group is at least modestly educated with at least high school educations and most have post secondary educations. The are also either skilled labor or professionals, meaning they are personally doing fine even in hard economic times. Over the past seven Presidencies the elections have mostly focused on National defense issues, not the economy. Only Bill Clinton won on mostly an economic campaign. National Defense concerns, among those 8-12% that decide Presidential elections, trump economic issues, which is one potential reason why republicans tend to get elected more often.

    Presidents have little to no impact on the economy anyway. Whatever policies they send to Congress almost NEVER get passed. Most Presidential budgets are dead on arrival. About all a Pres can do is appoint someone of like philosophy to the Federal Reserve.
     
  4. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    10,795
    Thanks Received:
    2,367
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,310
    I don't agree with that on a number of levels but it raises interesting points. I doubt anyone is non-ideological and the only ones who would be considered that are those who can stand back and make rational choices. But even the choices have some background ideology.

    My family sons and friends are in those professional levels and they are all on one side or the other of that imaginary center. In truth it seems a very few issues would push you to one side or the other. eg social security, welfare, taxes.

    Presidents have a enormous influence on the economy even when it bites them. Consider the crazy spending of Reagan and Bush and its outcome. Keynesian economics needs to be tempered with restraint it seems.


    "There is no historical evidence that tax cuts spur economic growth. The highest period of growth in U.S. history (1933-1973) also saw its highest tax rates on the rich: 70 to 91 percent. During this period, the general tax rate climbed as well, but it reached a plateau in 1969, and growth slowed down five years later. Almost all rich nations have higher general taxes than the U.S., and they are growing faster as well."

    Tax cuts spur economic growth
     
  5. SwingVoter
    Offline

    SwingVoter VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +129
    the fact that neither party admits is that different policies work at different times, Reagan cut taxes and the economy grew, Clinton raised taxes and the economy grew, Bush showed up at the White House and the economy tanked
     
  6. SwingVoter
    Offline

    SwingVoter VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +129
    One of the best fiscal moves ever was the gov't shutdown of '95. Led to budget surpluses and in the resulting gridlock spending was held to a minimum. The millions of government workers who spend all day surfing the web were forced to do so from home.

    Dem pres + GOP congress = balanced budget, economic growth, and a government far more limited than we've ever had with a GOP president
     
  7. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
  8. JimH52
    Offline

    JimH52 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,308
    Thanks Received:
    3,103
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    US
    Ratings:
    +8,300
    Reagon's trickle down theory never really trickled anywhere.
     

Share This Page