Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,260
- 15,767
- 2,210
Essentially all countries are populated mainly by people who were born there, and have never lived anywhere else. It is profound to have a country in which most of the inhabitants are people who are there because the consciously chose to be there, and to be a part of the country (and their descendants).
Of course this thought discounts the presence and interests of the indigenous Arab population, but I'm just sayin...
They reason they went there is from prosecution and most went to the US. They were there due to being poorer and needing a place, not because they CHOSE to be there, although a few might of . They were also the poor Jews, the rich ones came to America because that is where the money was, and as of yet anti jewism was not rampant. (lets talk about true history)
and read my signature line.
the signature line>>>>
Essentially all countries are populated mainly by people who were born there, and have never lived anywhere else. It is profound to have a country in which most of the inhabitants are people who are there because the consciously chose to be there, and to be a part of the country (and their descendants).
Of course this thought discounts the presence and interests of the indigenous Arab population, but I'm just sayin...
essentially-----you are blowing hot air. LOTS of countries are populated by peoples who are migrants to the area fairly
recently---(of course depending on what one labels are "relatively"
recently) I grew up in a semi rural/suburban town in the
northeast--------it had HAD a fairly stable core population for----
probably 100 years BEFORE world war II-----but then population boom
led to housebuilding boom -----and the farms went away and a whole town of one private house after the other appeared. Going back to that town there is not a single person left there who was there during my childhood-----it is a TOWN------but not at all one of long term inhabitants. Are the inhabitants of Australia largely people who have been there for more than 1000 years? Alaska?, Brooklyn, NY? Paris? London? (I have distant relatives in that city---
but they were not there for centuries either----I don't know them at all---have no idea even if they are still in London)
who are the original inhabitants of "Palestine"----who has background, uninterrupted, for thousands of years? for that matter---who are the thousands of years old habitants of Iraq?
California?
Gee I guess we know who was living there before the Israelites, must of been um, "not Israelites"
Deut 6:
10 When the Lord your God brings you into the land he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to give you—a land with large, flourishing cities you did not build, 11 houses filled with all kinds of good things you did not provide, wells you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plant—then when you eat and are satisfied, 12 be careful that you do not forget the Lord, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
(and those people forgot God so he sent them out to scatter among the earth , so now mimicking the people wrote about in the bible you have once again fought and killed most of the inhabitants of the land to make it your own- claiming the bible gives your ownership of it)
“Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either…There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab Population.”
Penelope----your posts are so idiotic that it is difficult to discuss them------you have already stated that the bible is a bunch of myths. Jews living in that which the Greeks call "palestina"---
is not from the BIBLE (unless you want to refer to the New Testament.) Deuteronomy is at the very beginning of the OLD TESTAMENT----the parts you claim is ALL MYTH It is from HISTORY----real history as written by
many historians and as confirmed thru archaeology.
If you believe that you make a point with your post---I am curious to know what you think it is-------as for your signature----SO?
what else is new------In fact there is not a single Land today called MUSLIM that did not have JEWISH CITIES therein ---
even before islam was invented. Currently the BIG
PUSH by Iran is to get their paws on a city named ADEN----and another named TAIZ. Aden is EDEN. Taiz is a port within a
larger land mass that was once called SHARAB. If you ever meet a person with the surname SHARABI-----you can be pretty sure that is a YEMENITE JEW I know some sharabi s and I know some ADENI s They have far more claim on both TAIZ and ADEN than does any Shiite from iran------those cities were theirs as far back as 3000 years ago ----hubby owns aden
(that's the most important----port AND oil -----the greedy Iranians
have already stolen it.
moshe dayan understood the arab mind-----he knew that if they squatted anywhere in the world ---in their own minds they OWN
it for all eternity-----he was doing his best to present THEIR POV.
ANDALUSIA is in the mind of THE POPE catholic land----in the muslim mind it is part of the CALIPHATE. There were catholics in Mecca when Muhummad was born------today the pope is considered TOO FILTHY to set foot on that cesspit
My signature is even on Wiki, I suggest you read everything he says. To say there were no Palestinians in Palestine is false history. I am not talking about Yemen here.
The only thing that gives you a right to Palestine is your weapons and money.
Ps: the Ot is mostly oral myths handed down, but its what ? jews like to use to base their claim on Palestine, but even according to their book they stole it, killed for it, and ruined it.