- Moderator
- #41
The spirit of the Lord is liberty
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When a Christian is attacked, then who is denying who in such a case ?Sure, that's why we have more than a thousand denominations using the Bible as a platform of agreement.
Your omission of my 1774 explanation is noted.
And the issue is not religion here, but the use of religion to deny secular civil rights.
The Constitution excluded such a perversion.
beagle, what do you mean? Christians are no more and no less protected from being attacked than any other members of a group. They get no special protection for being Christian. Nor should minorities. Nor should LGBT. Let all enjoy their civil liberties equally.
DS and Norweg tried to push the OP into ground that does not exist: there is no special protection for Christianity or Christians because they are such other than the right to believe as they wish and practice as they wish as long as there is no compelling interest to prohibit that practice. That applies to everybody.
That line is in respect to Parliament giving Catholic Canada religious freedom. Anti-Catholicism was something all Protestants could get behind.
As I said, every Christian denomination in what we call the 13 Colonies was quite willing to hinder other denominations.
Religion never had to be a "state thing," whatever the size and scope of a central authority. It just so happened that some of the states had churches.The government under the Articles had no real power, in that period, religion would be a state thing. I also wonder how many of the leaders of that period were closet-deists? It was, after all, a new age for the wise guys: the age of enlightenment and reason.
Politicians didn't just come on the scene, they had politicians when the Constitution was in the mill, and to claim to be a Christian at that time may have been just as important politically as it is today.Religion never had to be a "state thing," whatever the size and scope of a central authority. It just so happened that some of the states had churches.The government under the Articles had no real power, in that period, religion would be a state thing. I also wonder how many of the leaders of that period were closet-deists? It was, after all, a new age for the wise guys: the age of enlightenment and reason.
Closet deists? Was deism something to be ashamed of? Maybe so, eh. After all, the leaders, by and large, as Americans generally, were Christian.
OK, now if we could just remember that they are no less protected than anyone else, then maybe we could get somewhere again in this nation.Reading the silly three above (that excluses Regent) is good for cleaning the bowels. Their ignorance astounds.
The Christians in this country are no more and no less protected than anyone else.
Sorry, bubs, tis what it is.