Dynamic modeling at CBO--wonkish

[Bombur]

Maybe if you repeat it 20 more times it will magically turn into a coherent point.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Maybe if you repeat it 20 more times it will magically turn into a coherent point.

dear, if our schools routinely turn out the dumbest kids in the civilized world wouldn't dynamic scoring require that an increase in education spending predict a decline in GDP?

 

[Bombur]

No

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No

as a typical liberal you are too stupid to know that you should present the reason you say no. Ever see a conservative afraid of a debate? What does that teach you?

 

[Bombur]

No

as a typical liberal you are too stupid to know that you should present the reason you say no. Ever see a conservative afraid of a debate? What does that teach you?

The US public education system has produced a lot of very productive individuals and it is a major reason we have such a high standard of living. Any failure of that system doesn't even come close to making the investment not worthwhile and if anything additional resources may be needed. Although there are some issues with children that result in educational failures that are not the result of the quality of education, which is one of the many reasons dynamic scoring is so difficult to do and why it needs to be done by competent professionals and not partisans who don't understand the facts or even what it means to dynamically score spending.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Any failure of that system doesn't even come close to making the investment not worthwhile.

100% stupid and liberal of course. Question is not whether investment is worthwhile but whether as we have added money to education, test results have declined, incomes have declined, and GDP growth has slowed to an 80 year low such that CBO would have to conclude that further investment in our lib soviet schools would lower not raise GDP.

 

[Bombur]

That is not how a competent professional would dynamically score education funding. The connections you are making are nonsensical gibberish that is embarrassing to read.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

That is not how a competent professional would dynamically score education funding. The connections you are making are nonsensical gibberish that is embarrassing to read.

so a competent pro would assume increased investment in our failed lib soviet union schools would result in accelerated GDP growth and increased tax revenue??

 

[Bombur]

Depends on what the money is going towards. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US. That doesn't mean that you can spend a $1 and say it is for education and assume it will have a good ROI.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US.

you mean before our kids started sinking in world standings, thanks to libcommie union schools, to be about the dumbest kids in the civilized world?

 

[Bombur]

. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US.

you mean before our kids started sinking in world standings, thanks to libcommie union schools, to be about the dumbest kids in the civilized world?

It is still a massive benefit.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US.

you mean before our kids started sinking in world standings, thanks to libcommie union schools, to be about the dumbest kids in the civilized world?

It is still a massive benefit.

it would really be massive if they cut spending and got far better results.

 

[Bombur]

. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US.

you mean before our kids started sinking in world standings, thanks to libcommie union schools, to be about the dumbest kids in the civilized world?

It is still a massive benefit.

it would really be massive if they cut spending and got far better results.

Yes a scenario where they could spend less and get more would be great. That rule of thumb applies to everything. The problem is actually coming up with a plan that does that without relying on magical thinking.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Education generally speaking has resulted in a massive benefit to the people of the US.

you mean before our kids started sinking in world standings, thanks to libcommie union schools, to be about the dumbest kids in the civilized world?

It is still a massive benefit.

it would really be massive if they cut spending and got far better results.

Yes a scenario where they could spend less and get more would be great. That rule of thumb applies to everything. The problem is actually coming up with a plan that does that without relying on magical thinking.

Dear, the plan is to utilize the love parents have for their children and Republican capitalism. Liberals are stupid so their plan is to preserve the failed status quo.

Do you understand?

 

[Bombur]

Good luck with your plan.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Good luck with your plan.

too stupid its not my plan its the Republican plan while the Democratic plan is to maintain the status quo,i.e, keep producing about the dumbest kids in the civilized world.