drudge: newsite or gossip site?

do you read anything besides drudge sludge? your lack of knowledge is astounding.

jeff gannon was a gay escort that got press credentials from the bush whitehouse. he is widely presumed to be karl rove's boy toy... hence the press passes to someone who had no journalistic background.



Jeff Gannon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

whats the sppt. for the boy toy suspicion?if it maters rove was married from the 80's till last summer.
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
 
whats the sppt. for the boy toy suspicion?if it maters rove was married from the 80's till last summer.
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.

And lets not forget Bush's gay spiritual advisor.
 
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.

And lets not forget Bush's gay spiritual advisor.

how did anyone not know this guy was gay? didn't anyone in D.C. have gaydar?

photo-ted-haggard.jpg
 
I'm looking at the Drudge page right now...

Can some leftie tell me what current headlines are biased to the right?

Bump.....

Don't quite get the gay transformation of this thread, but...

bump...

Maybe you should read the thread instead of trying to get people to visit Drudgereports. We've all been there and experienced his bitter and hateful headlines. Stop lying about him being fair and balanced or whatever you're attempting to portray him as.

He isn't and everyone knows it including you.
 
Bump.....

Don't quite get the gay transformation of this thread, but...

bump...

Maybe you should read the thread instead of trying to get people to visit Drudgereports. We've all been there and experienced his bitter and hateful headlines. Stop lying about him being fair and balanced or whatever you're attempting to portray him as.

He isn't and everyone knows it including you.

I'm asking you to substantiate your claims...

Take the current front page of drudge and grab a couple of headlines slanted to the right...

If he's as biased as you claim then this should be rather easy...


Go for it...
 
Don't quite get the gay transformation of this thread, but...

bump...

Maybe you should read the thread instead of trying to get people to visit Drudgereports. We've all been there and experienced his bitter and hateful headlines. Stop lying about him being fair and balanced or whatever you're attempting to portray him as.

He isn't and everyone knows it including you.

I'm asking you to substantiate your claims...

Take the current front page of drudge and grab a couple of headlines slanted to the right...

If he's as biased as you claim then this should be rather easy...


Go for it...

So what's the hatemonger Breitbart doing these days?
 
Don't quite get the gay transformation of this thread, but...

bump...

Maybe you should read the thread instead of trying to get people to visit Drudgereports. We've all been there and experienced his bitter and hateful headlines. Stop lying about him being fair and balanced or whatever you're attempting to portray him as.

He isn't and everyone knows it including you.

I'm asking you to substantiate your claims...

Take the current front page of drudge and grab a couple of headlines slanted to the right...

If he's as biased as you claim then this should be rather easy...


Go for it...

you mean besides all he potshots at the NYT and global warming and everything left?

is that where you get your news?
 
Maybe you should read the thread instead of trying to get people to visit Drudgereports. We've all been there and experienced his bitter and hateful headlines. Stop lying about him being fair and balanced or whatever you're attempting to portray him as.

He isn't and everyone knows it including you.

I'm asking you to substantiate your claims...

Take the current front page of drudge and grab a couple of headlines slanted to the right...

If he's as biased as you claim then this should be rather easy...


Go for it...

you mean besides all he potshots at the NYT and global warming and everything left?

is that where you get your news?

Jeebus... Stop reading into what I'm saying...

I'm asking any leftist who wants to to find slanted headlines to the right (or anti-left) on the front page of Drudge...

Sheesh...

<bangs head against wall>
 
I'm asking you to substantiate your claims...

Take the current front page of drudge and grab a couple of headlines slanted to the right...

If he's as biased as you claim then this should be rather easy...


Go for it...

you mean besides all he potshots at the NYT and global warming and everything left?

is that where you get your news?

Jeebus... Stop reading into what I'm saying...

I'm asking any leftist who wants to to find slanted headlines to the right (or anti-left) on the front page of Drudge...

Sheesh...

<bangs head against wall>

you don't think pointed barbs at the nyt and 'global warming' isn't slanted?

and that's just today....

you're really not trying to say drudge isn't anything but a rightwing propagandist, are you?

and i don't answer to 'leftist'. i don't even know what a 'leftist' is unless we're talking extremists.
 
whats the sppt. for the boy toy suspicion?if it maters rove was married from the 80's till last summer.
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
Sorry, jillian. Didn't mean to ascribe that position to you. But you can't deny there are people who think that way.
 
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
Sorry, jillian. Didn't mean to ascribe that position to you. But you can't deny there are people who think that way.

:lol:
 
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
Sorry, jillian. Didn't mean to ascribe that position to you. But you can't deny there are people who think that way.

i know.. i know.. you didn't realize you were responding to me. :razz:

and yes, there are people who do things like that... on both sides... no question.
 
whats the sppt. for the boy toy suspicion?if it maters rove was married from the 80's till last summer.
The support is "we don't like Rove, so anything bad about him must be true!"

first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.

well , I am not sure what to a make of the he 'could' be roves boy toy, apparently rove used him to toss softballs at the pres. to make him look good. I don't know how we got from there to here....so Gammon or whatever his name signed into the WH or saw rove several times AND hes gay...so what? I have gay friends they even come to my home.

Why is his or drudges sexual orientation even a question?
 
you mean besides all he potshots at the NYT and global warming and everything left?

is that where you get your news?

Jeebus... Stop reading into what I'm saying...

I'm asking any leftist who wants to to find slanted headlines to the right (or anti-left) on the front page of Drudge...

Sheesh...

<bangs head against wall>

you don't think pointed barbs at the nyt and 'global warming' isn't slanted?
The NY Slimes is a pro-left joke... Their demise is evidence of this... I would laugh at anyone who claimed it was an unbiased source if journalistic integrity...

Global warming is a farce helping Algore get rich...

These are not the topic of the thread's discussion... I heard claims Drudge is biased and I would like at least one leftie to show me examples of article headlines from the current front page that are biased against the left... As I said, this should be easy to do...

and that's just today....
I'm sure you can cite an example, then... I await your link...


you're really not trying to say drudge isn't anything but a rightwing propagandist, are you?
Drudge the man may be biased against the left, but I see the front page of Drudge as a clearinghouse of current events, both left and right sources...

and i don't answer to 'leftist'. i don't even know what a 'leftist' is unless we're talking extremists.
Then don't reply...

Leftist, as I use the term, is anyone left of center.. I qualify the term leftist with "extremist" when I am referring to those types...

If you feel you meet the qualifications of "left of center leftist", then answer the question... If not, then pass it on by...
 
Last edited:
first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
Sorry, jillian. Didn't mean to ascribe that position to you. But you can't deny there are people who think that way.

i know.. i know.. you didn't realize you were responding to me. :razz:
Uhhh...actually, I was responding to Trajan. :lol:

and yes, there are people who do things like that... on both sides... no question.
:beer:
 
Jeebus... Stop reading into what I'm saying...

I'm asking any leftist who wants to to find slanted headlines to the right (or anti-left) on the front page of Drudge...

Sheesh...

<bangs head against wall>

you don't think pointed barbs at the nyt and 'global warming' isn't slanted?
The NY Slimes is a pro-left joke... Their demise is evidence of this... I would laugh at anyone who claimed it was an unbiased source if journalistic integrity...

Global warming is a farce helping Algore get rich...

These are not the topic of the thread's discussion... I heard claims Drudge is biased and I would like at least one leftie to show me examples of article headlines from the current front page that are biased against the left... As I said, this should be easy to do...


I'm sure you can cite an example, then... I await your link...


you're really not trying to say drudge isn't anything but a rightwing propagandist, are you?
Drudge the man may be biased against the left, but I see the front page of Drudge as a clearinghouse of current events, both left and right sources...

and i don't answer to 'leftist'. i don't even know what a 'leftist' is unless we're talking extremists.
Then don't reply...

Leftist, as I use the tern, is anyone left of center.. I qualify the term leftist with "extremist" when I am referring to those types...

If you feel you meet the qualifications of "left of center leftist", then answer the question... If not, then pass it on by...

did you think the NY times was biased when judy miller acted as the bush admin's shill in moving this country toward an unnecessary war in iraq by writing untruths about WMD's?

you can see drudge as anything you want. and you discounted the two things i mentioned because you have a particular bias. i'm not going to argue with you about something when you disregard what i say. it's fine. you have your own idea. i disagree with you.

i call drudgereport drudge sludge. and if he's not a rightwing propaganda site, why do all the people who get their news from drudge seem to have really extreme rightwing views?

as for left of center... on most issues i am and i'll cop to it. it doesn't make me a 'leftist' which has a similar sound and feel as when rightwingnuts say things like 'statist'. but since it's you, gomez, i'm not going to take offense at it or sweat it. :)
 
first, i said 'presumed boy toy'. i did not state it as an irrefutable fact. the 'support' is that jeff gannon had no journalistic background. he worked as a gay escort. he was signed in to the white house's guest list on many occasions with no justification. rove was the one who would have gotten him his 'press credentials'.

and the fact that rove is/was married is meaningless as to whether he is gay and closeted or his wife is his beard. he would not be the first or last to live that type of lie.

i'll refer you to ken mellman who ran the gop's anti-gay strategy for the 2004 election.

and, dave, you know very well that my not liking someone is irrelevant to whether he is gay or not.
Sorry, jillian. Didn't mean to ascribe that position to you. But you can't deny there are people who think that way.

:lol:

And there's one now!
 

Forum List

Back
Top