Drop the social issues, keep the reasonable fiscal conservatism

[Cowman]

And you'll stand a good chance in 2016.

People like fiscal conservatism, or at least they respect it. When that gets bundled up with all the social stuff that keeps losing you elections, you stand to gain nothing.

Society is changing and has changed already in many ways. You can't fight these progressive social issues. If you could, we'd still be stuck in the medieval ages with an aristocrat and peasant class.

Stop supporting radical wingnuts. The people like moderates. Stop allowing yourselves to be stuck with the only moderate running who happens to be a two face. In 2016 get yourself a good mix of moderates so you can get the BEST one out of them, not the only one who exists.

And for gods sake, stop turning your moderate candidates into hesitant conservative extremists. Let them be who they are.


Offer up something reasonable in 2016. Start now. Build yourself a fiscal conservative legend who doesn't get involved in the social witch hunts, and you stand a good chance.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Hmm, that would be "Libertarianism" would it not?

 

[thanatos144]

Hey idiots thats what Romney did.

 

[Bigfoot]

The social issues are important to me, thanks, I'll vote my conscience.

 

[thanatos144]

The social issues are important to me, thanks, I'll vote my conscience.

Its sad they think Romney was the one talking about those issues....It was Obama and Paulbots bringing them up.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Keep it? They'd have to have it in the first place.

 

[Avatar4321]

Funny, Obama brought up the social issues. He avoided the fiscal issues like the plague and wont reelection.

 

[AmyNation]

But are the social issues where the votes are? If thats the majoroty of your party then represent, however if your party cant win women or minorities, how long can you survive?

 

[thanatos144]

I am ill at the fact that it seems women only care about their vaginas and killing babies.