Drive-By Media Defend Planned Parenthood Debacle

LIke putting a Cuban cigar in the the interns OVAL orifice, in the Oval Office? That was his time? If any Republican would of done that, impeachment hearing for the actions would of been instigated. But Bill wasn't impeached for his transgressions of a woman working for him, but for his LYING UNDER OATH, where he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" only because the BLUE DRESS with his DNA on it, was brought forth, for if Monica wouldn't of spit on the dress, she would of been just another BIMBO. When you keep trying to rewrite history(propaganda of Woodrow Wilson) it may work for those with limited information, but those who read REAL history wont allow you to get away with it. BILL CLINTON was and still is a RAPIST, and your "WAR on WOMEN" allows him to get away with it.

No, what let's Clinton get away with it is you guys have a fat, frustrated homosexual who gets on the air every day at Noon and screams about women being Feminazis" and "Sluts".

Looking at it from another view, Reagan sold missiles to the Ayatollahs and Bush started a war on a lie, and neither of those guys got impeached, but you guys went hysterical over a blow job?
 
he economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, there it was said 3 times, so it must be true. So when the 2 attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon happened, it was justified for George Bush to declare war? Double standards, without those, liberals would have no standards at all. Did you hear a deer in the woods?

Guy, you are kind of babbling here. I don't even think you are following your own argument at this point.

No one had a problem with Bush going after Al Qaeda. The problem we had was that 1) He ignored warnings from the CIA before 9/11 happened and 2) He used 9/11 as an excuse to go to war with Saddam, who had nothing to do with 9/11.

Did you notice that the DOW is down 1000 points for the past month? Why in such a roaring economy would there be such a sell off, other than the economy sucks? Funny how you go back 6 3/4 years to make a point and totally disregard what events are happening NOW. Well not really funny, because many people who have investing in Obama's economy are losing lots of money.

They are still vastly better off than they were 7 years ago, that's the point.
 
he economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, there it was said 3 times, so it must be true. So when the 2 attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon happened, it was justified for George Bush to declare war? Double standards, without those, liberals would have no standards at all. Did you hear a deer in the woods?

Guy, you are kind of babbling here. I don't even think you are following your own argument at this point.

No one had a problem with Bush going after Al Qaeda. The problem we had was that 1) He ignored warnings from the CIA before 9/11 happened and 2) He used 9/11 as an excuse to go to war with Saddam, who had nothing to do with 9/11.

Did you notice that the DOW is down 1000 points for the past month? Why in such a roaring economy would there be such a sell off, other than the economy sucks? Funny how you go back 6 3/4 years to make a point and totally disregard what events are happening NOW. Well not really funny, because many people who have investing in Obama's economy are losing lots of money.

They are still vastly better off than they were 7 years ago, that's the point.
When Japan attacked pearl harbor, we declared "WAR" on Germany, and that was a progressive liberal who wanted an excuse to take US to war, to help get the economy going. Why is it okay for a liberal Democrat to do the very same thing that a liberal Republican did? Double Standards, that is why.
 
LIke putting a Cuban cigar in the the interns OVAL orifice, in the Oval Office? That was his time? If any Republican would of done that, impeachment hearing for the actions would of been instigated. But Bill wasn't impeached for his transgressions of a woman working for him, but for his LYING UNDER OATH, where he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" only because the BLUE DRESS with his DNA on it, was brought forth, for if Monica wouldn't of spit on the dress, she would of been just another BIMBO. When you keep trying to rewrite history(propaganda of Woodrow Wilson) it may work for those with limited information, but those who read REAL history wont allow you to get away with it. BILL CLINTON was and still is a RAPIST, and your "WAR on WOMEN" allows him to get away with it.

No, what let's Clinton get away with it is you guys have a fat, frustrated homosexual who gets on the air every day at Noon and screams about women being Feminazis" and "Sluts".

Looking at it from another view, Reagan sold missiles to the Ayatollahs and Bush started a war on a lie, and neither of those guys got impeached, but you guys went hysterical over a blow job?
Most , but not all, liberal women are sluts and feminazis, that is why they are part of the NOW or NAGS and vote for the very people who have that "WAR ON WOMEN". Bunch of dumbass females, who vote with their Vaginas and not their brains.
 
When Japan attacked pearl harbor, we declared "WAR" on Germany, and that was a progressive liberal who wanted an excuse to take US to war, to help get the economy going. Why is it okay for a liberal Democrat to do the very same thing that a liberal Republican did? Double Standards, that is why.

I think you are a little confused, again.

We didn't declare war on Germany, Germany declared war on us. Hitler wasn't obligated to, as the Treaty Germany had with Japan was a "defensive" one. But he did anyway because he figured the US would declare war on him and oh, yeah, he was a crazy person.

Now, you'd get closer to an argument if you pointed out that FDR made the decision to prioritize Europe over the Pacific.
 
Most , but not all, liberal women are sluts and feminazis, that is why they are part of the NOW or NAGS and vote for the very people who have that "WAR ON WOMEN". Bunch of dumbass females, who vote with their Vaginas and not their brains.

again, guy, I think you are a little confused. Women are voting their own economic interests. It's a lot of you working class whites who don't.
 
Most , but not all, liberal women are sluts and feminazis, that is why they are part of the NOW or NAGS and vote for the very people who have that "WAR ON WOMEN". Bunch of dumbass females, who vote with their Vaginas and not their brains.

again, guy, I think you are a little confused. Women are voting their own economic interests. It's a lot of you working class whites who don't.
So as long as the women don't have to pay for abortions, then they will f_ck like bunnies, until they get pregnant, then abort the child, because you libtards don't want to pay welfare for it? Boy you have EVIL intentions and use women in a bad way. "THE WAR ON WOMEN" is being performed by liberals, yet the dumbass liberal women are too stupid to see it.
 
So as long as the women don't have to pay for abortions, then they will f_ck like bunnies, until they get pregnant, then abort the child, because you libtards don't want to pay welfare for it? Boy you have EVIL intentions and use women in a bad way. "THE WAR ON WOMEN" is being performed by liberals, yet the dumbass liberal women are too stupid to see it.

Guy, you have some serious sexual hangups.

I don't think any woman has sex thinking, "Well, if I get pregnant, I can always have an abortion." I think they either think birth control will work, or maybe they were in the heat of the moment.

Incidently, I think the governmetn SHOULD pay for abortions. I think that we should have universal health care like France or the UK.
 
Like they had in the USSR where they took everyones money, made everyone equal, equally poor and equally miserable. So far, many of the middle class has sunk into the poor since your liar in chief took office, but as always with socialism, only the liberal elites will have all the money, and the rest of US will suffer. Such stupid people who don't study history, but tend to repeat it.
 
Like they had in the USSR where they took everyones money, made everyone equal, equally poor and equally miserable. So far, many of the middle class has sunk into the poor since your liar in chief took office, but as always with socialism, only the liberal elites will have all the money, and the rest of US will suffer. Such stupid people who don't study history, but tend to repeat it.

I have a history degree, thanks. Mine didn't come from a university where they teach about talking snakes in Science Class.

SO your argument is, Obama didn't fix everything Bush fucked up fast enough. Rule of life. It's harder to fix things than break them.
 
A degree in History? Did it come out of a Cracker Jack's box? George Bush was in office when the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac(which in 2004 was warned of impending doom) went belly up, because of liberal compassion that Jimmy Carter and William Jefferson Clinton enacted(oh yeah you sure have a degree in history) but you libtards had to blame someone or the people would start to kill you libs. Just like today, B.O. cant get a roaring economy because libs don't know how to run things, just ruin things. Maybe instead of paying 10's of thousands of dollars on wasted college, you go read REAL history and then get back to me. Who ever is going to be the next president is going to inherit a worse mess than stinky did back in 2009.
 
degree in History? Did it come out of a Cracker Jack's box? George Bush was in office when the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac(which in 2004 was warned of impending doom) went belly up, because of liberal compassion that Jimmy Carter and William Jefferson Clinton enacted(oh yeah you sure have a degree in history) but you libtards had to blame someone or the people would start to kill you libs.

Freddie, Fannie and the CRA were not hte problem. Even if they were, in 2004, Bush had control ob both houses of Congress and could have passed any fix he needed.

Just like today, B.O. cant get a roaring economy because libs don't know how to run things, just ruin things. Maybe instead of paying 10's of thousands of dollars on wasted college, you go read REAL history and then get back to me. Who ever is going to be the next president is going to inherit a worse mess than stinky did back in 2009.

The more you post, the more I am convinced you are retarded.
 
he economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, the economy is recovering, there it was said 3 times, so it must be true. So when the 2 attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon happened, it was justified for George Bush to declare war? Double standards, without those, liberals would have no standards at all. Did you hear a deer in the woods?

Guy, you are kind of babbling here. I don't even think you are following your own argument at this point.

No one had a problem with Bush going after Al Qaeda. The problem we had was that 1) He ignored warnings from the CIA before 9/11 happened and 2) He used 9/11 as an excuse to go to war with Saddam, who had nothing to do with 9/11.

Did you notice that the DOW is down 1000 points for the past month? Why in such a roaring economy would there be such a sell off, other than the economy sucks? Funny how you go back 6 3/4 years to make a point and totally disregard what events are happening NOW. Well not really funny, because many people who have investing in Obama's economy are losing lots of money.

They are still vastly better off than they were 7 years ago, that's the point.
When Japan attacked pearl harbor, we declared "WAR" on Germany, and that was a progressive liberal who wanted an excuse to take US to war, to help get the economy going. Why is it okay for a liberal Democrat to do the very same thing that a liberal Republican did? Double Standards, that is why.
You're a fucking imbecile. You really are.

We declared war on Germany after Germany declared war on us and aligned themselves with Japan, who attacked us days earlier.

You should educate yourself on matters you know nothing about (which is pretty much everything) so you don't make such an ass of yourself posting here.
 
A degree in History? Did it come out of a Cracker Jack's box? George Bush was in office when the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac(which in 2004 was warned of impending doom) went belly up, because of liberal compassion that Jimmy Carter and William Jefferson Clinton enacted(oh yeah you sure have a degree in history) but you libtards had to blame someone or the people would start to kill you libs. Just like today, B.O. cant get a roaring economy because libs don't know how to run things, just ruin things. Maybe instead of paying 10's of thousands of dollars on wasted college, you go read REAL history and then get back to me. Who ever is going to be the next president is going to inherit a worse mess than stinky did back in 2009.
More conservative ignorance.

The CRA did not cause the economy to collapse. :eusa_doh:
 
Democrats in their own words Covering up Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac scandal
When liberal compassion is presented as affordable housing for everyone, because everyone(whether they can afford it or not) should be able to have the American Dream. So once again, liberal screw up America, then blame it on George Bush, so today, B.O. who claims he inherited a mess, has just made it worse. You sociopaths on the left, had LIED over and over, in the hope that it would eventually be true. But TRUTH, tells it differently. How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!
If the Vagina wins the 2016 election, she is going to inherit a mess worse off than Obama did.
 
Democrats in their own words Covering up Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac scandal
When liberal compassion is presented as affordable housing for everyone, because everyone(whether they can afford it or not) should be able to have the American Dream. So once again, liberal screw up America, then blame it on George Bush, so today, B.O. who claims he inherited a mess, has just made it worse. You sociopaths on the left, had LIED over and over, in the hope that it would eventually be true. But TRUTH, tells it differently. How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!
If the Vagina wins the 2016 election, she is going to inherit a mess worse off than Obama did.

Apparently, you're too retarded to comprehend there is nothing in that video which blames the CRA for the meltdown.

And how could there be? It didn't cause it.
 
Apparently you didn't notice that the date was in 2004 warning about the eventual collapse of the housing bubble, that was created by the liberals who had people purchasing housing they couldn't afford. But since you are a goosestepping, koolaid drinking, mindnumbed, low information, useful idiot, you continue to follow those that have and are still ruining America. Everyday, I see more people on the streets, who look for change, and I tell them that Obama has 7 million dollars, I don't, go ask him for change.
 
Apparently you didn't notice that the date was in 2004 warning about the eventual collapse of the housing bubble, that was created by the liberals who had people purchasing housing they couldn't afford. But since you are a goosestepping, koolaid drinking, mindnumbed, low information, useful idiot, you continue to follow those that have and are still ruining America. Everyday, I see more people on the streets, who look for change, and I tell them that Obama has 7 million dollars, I don't, go ask him for change.

That's it, taunting the Homeless, that's what Jesus would do!

Okay, guy, the housing collapse didn't happen because banks were required to loan to people in poor neighborhoods who otherwise qualified for loans. (Which is all the CRA does.)

The housing collapse happened because a lot of middle class folks bought McMansions they couldn't afford, sunk a bunch of money upgrading them with pools and granite counter tops hoping to flip them in a couple of years.

And your Boy Bush was all for this, because it gave the illusion of economic progress while we continued to bleed manufacturing jobs on his watch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

“We can put light where there’s darkness, and hope where there’s despondency in this country. And part of it is working together as a nation to encourage folks to own their own home.” — President Bush, Oct. 15, 2002

He pushed hard to expand homeownership, especially among minorities, an initiative that dovetailed with his ambition to expand the Republican tent — and with the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.

Mr. Bush did foresee the danger posed by Fannie Mae andFreddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage finance giants. The president spent years pushing a recalcitrant Congress to toughen regulation of the companies, but was unwilling to compromise when his former Treasury secretary wanted to cut a deal. And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.

As early as 2006, top advisers to Mr. Bush dismissed warnings from people inside and outside the White House that housing prices were inflated and that a foreclosure crisis was looming. And when the economy deteriorated, Mr. Bush and his team misdiagnosed the reasons and scope of the downturn; as recently as February, for example, Mr. Bush was still calling it a “rough patch.”
 
Apparently you didn't notice that the date was in 2004 warning about the eventual collapse of the housing bubble, that was created by the liberals who had people purchasing housing they couldn't afford. But since you are a goosestepping, koolaid drinking, mindnumbed, low information, useful idiot, you continue to follow those that have and are still ruining America. Everyday, I see more people on the streets, who look for change, and I tell them that Obama has 7 million dollars, I don't, go ask him for change.

That's it, taunting the Homeless, that's what Jesus would do!

Okay, guy, the housing collapse didn't happen because banks were required to loan to people in poor neighborhoods who otherwise qualified for loans. (Which is all the CRA does.)

The housing collapse happened because a lot of middle class folks bought McMansions they couldn't afford, sunk a bunch of money upgrading them with pools and granite counter tops hoping to flip them in a couple of years.

And your Boy Bush was all for this, because it gave the illusion of economic progress while we continued to bleed manufacturing jobs on his watch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

“We can put light where there’s darkness, and hope where there’s despondency in this country. And part of it is working together as a nation to encourage folks to own their own home.” — President Bush, Oct. 15, 2002

He pushed hard to expand homeownership, especially among minorities, an initiative that dovetailed with his ambition to expand the Republican tent — and with the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.

Mr. Bush did foresee the danger posed by Fannie Mae andFreddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage finance giants. The president spent years pushing a recalcitrant Congress to toughen regulation of the companies, but was unwilling to compromise when his former Treasury secretary wanted to cut a deal. And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.

As early as 2006, top advisers to Mr. Bush dismissed warnings from people inside and outside the White House that housing prices were inflated and that a foreclosure crisis was looming. And when the economy deteriorated, Mr. Bush and his team misdiagnosed the reasons and scope of the downturn; as recently as February, for example, Mr. Bush was still calling it a “rough patch.”
Nice reliable source there , the NY times, one of the most lickspittle news ORG's ever. yes Bush, like his father was a liberal Republican who reached across the aisle to help the Dumbocrats screw US over even more(NO MORE BUSHes or Clintons) but you voted not once but twice for Obama, who is even worse than Bush, and you swoon over him like he was the new messiah. And Warren Buffet(who pays less taxes than his secretary) has made billions more while more people are in poverty since the war on poverty was created by LBJ. Over 5 trillion dollars have been wasted on that war, yet Bush created 4 trillion dollars of debt(Obama called that unpatriotic) and Obama has created 9 trillion dollars of debt(is that unpatriotic also?) and you aren't saying a thing.
 
George H.W. Bush New World Order Speech
Bill Clinton New World Order speech
George W. Bush New Order of the Ages
OBAMA NEW WORLD ORDER SPEECH in Brussels - Freedom isnt Free
There will be a new world order, it isn't going to be good for you or me, but the liberal elites (R) and (D) are going to make out like the bandits they are. Maybe or maybe not, the purge will happen, and estimates are 6 1/2 billion people being removed from this planet. Maybe or maybe not it might be you guys. But since there is no sanctity of life in or out of the womb, those liberals couldn't care less about you, which is why they are screwing you every change they can.
 

Forum List

Back
Top