Drinking and posting?

Should users abstain from posting while consuming large quantities of alcohol?


  • Total voters
    24
I know which way David votes on this one. He's hoping that one of the objects of his obsession loses inhibitions through excessive alcohol consumption...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
What's sad is that i keep coprrecting people and pointing put logiical fallacies.. while drunk..

wtf?!

if you're being refuted by someone weho's intoxxicated, what does that say about your intial argument?

oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism
 
oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests
 
beer2.gif
 
Agna, if you thin I'm so off base, then refue my points, show my claims assertions to be false, destory my presmise, and force to me to aknowledge that I am wrong

otherwise, it shall be read s a forfeit by someone who cannot refue what JB has said

The challenge has been made ;)
 
oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests
You mean it isn't yet glaringly evident to you that he's just makes this shit up as he goes along?? :lol:
 
or is that 'us fools'...?

'we fools who post.';


'one of us...'


i need an English major or something/ Anyone know what that's supposed to be?

'we who are fools..'

I thin it;s 'we fools', byut I could be wrong
 
I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests
You mean it isn't yet glaringly evident to you that he's just makes this shit up as he goes along?? :lol:

i concluded that liong ago. i still theorize, assert that is the reason he has not yet responded
 
or is that 'us fools'...?

'we fools who post.';


'one of us...'


i need an English major or something/ Anyone know what that's supposed to be?

'we who are fools..'

I thin it;s 'we fools', byut I could be wrong

I'm an English major.

But that information is classified and not distributed amongst drunken fools.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top