Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD dumb ass.
"Obama is OPPOSED to Nuclear energy. He is also opposed to Natural Gas."
Only in your wild fantasies are the statements true
It is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD dumb ass.
"Obama is OPPOSED to Nuclear energy. He is also opposed to Natural Gas."
Only in your wild fantasies are the statements true
You are a retard. Early in his candidacy he was on a program, I believe in California. He went on and on about how he would tax the Coal and Natural Gas power stations out of Business and how he was opposed to Nuclear energy.
Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time - NYTimes.com
Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling...
Mar 31, 2010 ... WASHINGTON The Obama administration is proposing to open vast ... Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday. ... made significant concessions on coal and nuclear power to try to ... energy policy that can open new areas to oil and gas development ...
How many nuclear subs have been problems? I talked to enough nuke sub guys who say they are very safe.
How many nuclear subs have been problems? I talked to enough nuke sub guys who say they are very safe.
That's because subs are built to MIL-SPEC under strict government control and cost is not so much of a factor.
It is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD dumb ass.
"Obama is OPPOSED to Nuclear energy. He is also opposed to Natural Gas."
Only in your wild fantasies are the statements true
You are a retard. Early in his candidacy he was on a program, I believe in California. He went on and on about how he would tax the Coal and Natural Gas power stations out of Business and how he was opposed to Nuclear energy.
BP and the oil spill. It was bound to happen. Why? Because shit happens.
1969 Oil Spill - Summary Articles and Images
Where are all the loudmouths on the right and others who tout drilling in pristine areas? Where do the right and Obama stand on building more Nuke reactors? Accidents can and do happen.
Why not openly and fairly address the long term costs of waste and short term benefits of energy production? Waste products pose a huge problem. New nuclear reactor?s waste is seven times more hazardous, Greenpeace exposes | Greenpeace International
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Waste
Wastes generated during the exploration, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy are categorized by EPA as "special wastes" and are exempt from federal hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Waste | Special Wastes | Wastes | US EPA
I understand there are costs to all actions. But I wonder if we really truly discuss what we are getting into or does private industry get to dictate the mistakes we will live with?
Will Nuclear Nod Get GOP to Support Obama on Energy Bill? - TIMEWhy Obama's Nuclear Bet Won't Pay Off
If you want to understand why the U.S. hasn't built a nuclear reactor in three decades, the Vogtle power plant outside Atlanta is an excellent reminder of the insanity of nuclear economics. The plant's original cost estimate was less than $1 billion for four reactors. Its eventual price tag in 1989 was nearly $9 billion, for only two reactors. But now there's widespread chatter about a nuclear renaissance, so the Southern Co. is finally trying to build the other two reactors at Vogtle. The estimated cost: $14 billion. And you can be sure that number is way too low, because nuclear cost estimates are always way too low.
That's why no Wall Street moneyman in his right mind would finance a new reactor. But President Obama has located an alternative financier: you.
Read more: Nuclear Reactors, Georgia, NRC: Obama Energy Policy - TIME
BP and the oil spill. It was bound to happen. Why? Because shit happens.
1969 Oil Spill - Summary Articles and Images
Where are all the loudmouths on the right and others who tout drilling in pristine areas? Where do the right and Obama stand on building more Nuke reactors? Accidents can and do happen.
Why not openly and fairly address the long term costs of waste and short term benefits of energy production? Waste products pose a huge problem. New nuclear reactor?s waste is seven times more hazardous, Greenpeace exposes | Greenpeace International
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Waste
Wastes generated during the exploration, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy are categorized by EPA as "special wastes" and are exempt from federal hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Waste | Special Wastes | Wastes | US EPA
I understand there are costs to all actions. But I wonder if we really truly discuss what we are getting into or does private industry get to dictate the mistakes we will live with?
Will Nuclear Nod Get GOP to Support Obama on Energy Bill? - TIMEWhy Obama's Nuclear Bet Won't Pay Off
If you want to understand why the U.S. hasn't built a nuclear reactor in three decades, the Vogtle power plant outside Atlanta is an excellent reminder of the insanity of nuclear economics. The plant's original cost estimate was less than $1 billion for four reactors. Its eventual price tag in 1989 was nearly $9 billion, for only two reactors. But now there's widespread chatter about a nuclear renaissance, so the Southern Co. is finally trying to build the other two reactors at Vogtle. The estimated cost: $14 billion. And you can be sure that number is way too low, because nuclear cost estimates are always way too low.
That's why no Wall Street moneyman in his right mind would finance a new reactor. But President Obama has located an alternative financier: you.
Read more: Nuclear Reactors, Georgia, NRC: Obama Energy Policy - TIME
My concern is the disposal of the spent fuel. Wouldn't that pose a potential hazard?
I have written ,published, and copyrighted a book that advocates an approach to energy consumption that transcends a type of fuel or type of device that uses fuel or energy. My concept is based on common sense and is not patentable as it is public knowledge. I haven't sold many books because the ideas are not racy or sexy and would seek to reduce the concentration of power and wealth in a given industrial sector.
I don't mean to spam, but the book is for sale on various online bookstores and I would be happy to give its name if that is permissible. I don't want to violate forum rules so I would need permission to give its name before doing so.
As much as I would like to see us move away from petroleum based energy I am afraid we are stuck with it for a long time. Our entire economic system has been designed to use these fuels, and to convert to other fuels or energy sources would mean a dramatac and costly change. I do think we should at least do pilot projects to look at the feasiblity of using alternate energy sources.
This 'one-size-fits-all' attitude is getting in our way and I think it will take a change of mindset before we can make good progress on alternate energy sources and usage.
a nuke in the hands of a democrap ????? who needs terrorists????
I got a better idea.
Let's use our $600 billion in defense spending to crush the Middle East once and for all and take all the damn oil we want.
a nuke in the hands of a democrap ????? who needs terrorists????
eat shit and die asshole.
a nuke in the hands of a democrap ????? who needs terrorists????
eat shit and die asshole.
watch for the blinding flash then stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye
eat shit and die asshole.
watch for the blinding flash then stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye
I bet you blame all your problems on the war, huh? I know your kind. In the neighborhood we all knew.
watch for the blinding flash then stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye
I bet you blame all your problems on the war, huh? I know your kind. In the neighborhood we all knew.
i know your kind. frightening. your what Freud called spooky
I bet you blame all your problems on the war, huh? I know your kind. In the neighborhood we all knew.
i know your kind. frightening. your what Freud called spooky
Freud didn't call me anything, nor did Jung, I came after their time...but Carl Rodgers did call me something
eat shit and die asshole.
watch for the blinding flash then stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye
I bet you blame all your problems on the war, huh? I know your kind. In the neighborhood we all knew.
watch for the blinding flash then stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye
I bet you blame all your problems on the war, huh? I know your kind. In the neighborhood we all knew.
That's rather unkind. What a TURD you are.
