Dreyfus Or Clouseau?

[Flanders]

The latest release of Clinton’s e-mails should tell Democrats that Trey Gowdy’s Select Committee is far from finished:

​

If FBI Director Comey does not have enough evidence to arrest Hillary Clinton by now it will be tough for the rest of us to decide if Comey is Inspector Clouseau or Chief Inspector Dreyfus:

​

Citing Benghazi to promote this line of reasoning does not smell right:

“I don’t think there’s anything more frustrating for a member of the Foreign Service than to be out there, deployed abroad, and unable to do any good.”

XXXXX​

A survey of 1,600 active-duty State Department employees released in April by the American Foreign Service Association found that more than half believed that “post-Benghazi, it is now more difficult for employees to effectively engage overseas.” Twenty-five percent of diplomatic security agents said the same thing.

Benghazi chill ripples through State Department
By Julian Hattem
12/02/15 06:00 AM EST

Benghazi chill ripples through State Department​

Exactly, what does “. . . unable to do any good.” and “. . . effectively engage overseas.” mean? Do good for who?

And I cannot see diplomats unable to engage with a host government?

Both phrases smell like promoting a United Nations agenda that has nothing to do with America’s sovereignty —— protecting America’s sovereignty is something most Americans still believe is the State Department’s one and only purpose. If unable to engage arises, it is time for the State Department to pack their balloons and leave the country in question. Apparently, Benghazi fell between the cracks on that one since Secretary of State Clinton was engaged with the wrong people, or else she did not know what was taking place right under her nose.

Then comes President Hillary Clinton. This smells worse than effectively engage overseas:

FBI Director James Comey is the pivotal figure in the 2016 presidential race that no one is talking about.

Comey, a Republican appointed by President Obama who enjoys a stellar reputation on both sides of the aisle, is investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of State.

Clinton is the overwhelming favorite to win the Democratic presidential nomination next year and is expected to be a tough candidate for any Republican to face in 2016.

December 01, 2015, 06:00 am
FBI chief is wild card for Clinton
By Bob Cusack and Ian Swanson

FBI chief is wild card for Clinton​

Frankly, if Clinton was so formidable Republicans would not have come out of the woodwork to take her on. The Democrat party in 2008 belonged to the Clintons, yet the Chicago sewer rat was the one and only time Hillary faced a real opponent in a campaign, and he whipped her sorry ass for HER party’s nomination.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

999 crimes thus far.

Maybe he likes even numbers.

 

[Flanders]

If FBI Director Comey does not have enough evidence to arrest Hillary Clinton by now it will be tough for the rest of us to decide if Comey is Inspector Clouseau or Chief Inspector Dreyfus:

The douche bag in the White House has no reputation to lose, but can you imagine how Director Comey and AG Loretta Lynch will look if this takes off:

WASHINGTON – With the possibility fading of Barack Obama’s Justice Department prosecuting the inevitable Democratic Party presidential nominee, a new independent campaign has arisen to expose Hillary Clinton’s criminal actions and prosecute her at the state level.

It’s called the Hillary Clinton Investigative Justice Project, and it was conceived by two veteran investigative journalists who plan to take their findings to state attorneys general in jurisdictions in which the nonprofit, tax-exempt Clinton Family Foundation does business.

“The Clinton Family Foundation is effectively a criminal, money-laundering operation principally established to enrich the founders with political payoff money, including millions from foreign donors,” said Joseph Farah, founder and chief executive officer of WND. “It’s a racketeering enterprise protected by the Democratic Party dons – including the president of the United States and his attorney general.”

Farah and WND senior staff writer Jerome Corsi, a two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author, have teamed up with the express purpose of bringing the Clintons to justice. Farah and Corsi have been investigating and reporting on the Clintons for 23 years.
​

Instead of donating money to Republican wannabes so they can beat Hillary Clinton to the White House, donate your money to the Hillary Clinton Investigative Justice Project so she takes her next vacation in a state slammer if she beats the federal rap:

The project will be funded by contributions from ordinary Americans to accomplish three goals:

expand the investigative reporting efforts into Hillary Clinton’s illegal activities;
empower prosecutors at the state level to bring charges against her;
prevent her from becoming the next president of the United States

'Hillary for prosecution, not president'
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/08/2015 @ 7:24 pm

‘Hillary for prosecution, not president’​

 

[Flanders]

WASHINGTON – With the possibility fading of Barack Obama’s Justice Department prosecuting the inevitable Democratic Party presidential nominee, a new independent campaign has arisen to expose Hillary Clinton’s criminal actions and prosecute her at the state level.

The only way the following can backfire is Hillary NOT being indicted:

​

Charles Krauthammer agreed, saying that while Trump would probably be the only candidate who would dare go that far with the former president, it’s “too toxic” and “probably will backfire” and “generate sympathy” for Clinton.​

Fox Panelists: If Trump Goes After Bill Clinton to Attack Hillary, It Will Backfire
by Josh Feldman
7:30 pm, December 24th, 2015

Fox Panelists: If Trump Goes After Bill Clinton to Attack Hillary, It Will Backfire​

 

[IsaacNewton]

Indicted for what?

Cons you and your wet dreams. That is all you have isn't it.

 

[Flanders]

If FBI Director Comey does not have enough evidence to arrest Hillary Clinton by now it will be tough for the rest of us to decide if Comey is Inspector Clouseau or Chief Inspector Dreyfus:

The jury is leaning toward Inspector Clouseau:

The emails that the State Department yesterday told the Republican National Committee cannot be found are the ones sent and received by Clinton former aide, Bryan Pagliano—the person who set up Clinton’s private server and email apparatus who was granted immunity to testify in March, 2016.

Having been granted the immunity he sought, his emails go missing?

How convenient!

In other words, having been granted immunity, the emails sent to or received by him between 2009 and 2013-the years of Clinton’s tenure as America’s top diplomat, have gone missing.

Hello?​

Guess who’s covering up the tracks of Hillary’s email scandal?
By Judi McLeod
May 10, 2016

Guess who’s covering up the tracks of Hillary’s email scandal?​

 

[PredFan]

Obama has a D after his name, Loretta Lynch has a D after her name, Hillary Clinton has a D after her name. Does anyone really think she will be indicted?

 

[PredFan]

Indicted for what?

Cons you and your wet dreams. That is all you have isn't it.

Sure moron, she destroyed the evidence, and even more evidence was recently "lost". She can't be convicted due to lack of evidence so she must be innocent, right?

 

[Flanders]

Sure moron, she destroyed the evidence, and even more evidence was recently "lost". She can't be convicted due to lack of evidence so she must be innocent, right?

To PredFan: Here is another one for the NO SHIT file:

“The whole thing stinks to high heaven,”​

Former DOJ Official: Email Case Against Hillary Clinton ‘Stinks To High Heaven’
by Patrick Howley
11 May 2016

Former DOJ Official: Email Case Against Hillary Clinton 'Stinks To High Heaven' - Breitbart​

 

[Flanders]

Things are looking good for Comey —— and bad for Hillary:

But when asked Wednesday by Fox News about Clinton's characterization of the bureau's probe, FBI Director James Comey said he doesn’t know what "security inquiry" means -- adding, “We’re conducting an investigation. … That’s what we do.”

The FBI director reiterated that he’s “not familiar with the term security inquiry” when told that is the phrase Clinton has used.

Comey rebuffs Clinton claim FBI only conducting ‘security inquiry’ on emails
Published May 11, 2016

Comey rebuffs Clinton claim FBI only conducting ‘security inquiry’ on emails | Fox News​

 

[Flanders]

https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M1f785c5342eac7ad6f9209109d64bcf5o0&pid=Api&w=240&h=181

She must suck on a hubbly bubbly before she does an interview:

Appearing on Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom” with Bill Hemmer on Friday, Wasserman Schultz scoffed at the idea of an investigation, claiming that “Clinton isn’t even a target of this inquiry, investigation, whatever ‘I’ word you want to use.”​

Wasserman Schultz: Hillary Not The Target Of FBI Investigation
Steve Guest
Media Reporter
1:17 PM 05/13/2016

Wasserman Schultz: Hillary Not The Target Of FBI Investigation [VIDEO]​

Now watch this:

Clinton downplays FBI probe, calls it a 'security inquiry'