Dr Martin Luther King saved this country

[Polishprince]

We should help those who are unable to help themselves because of mental or physical limitations. Everyone else should be responsible for his or her life and welfare.

Funny isn't it that republicans and conservatives give much more to charity than democrats and liberals. Could it be that liberals do not practice what they preach?

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
There is no reason some people should live in abject poverty

the poor in the US are much better off than the middle class in the rest of the world. Many of our homeless are homeless by choice, not because of anything the government has, or has not, done. There is no "abject poverty" in the USA today. If you want to see abject poverty go to Calcutta India or Guatamala, or parts of Mexico. You have no idea what abject poverty is if you think the people living on the sidewalks of our big cities are living in abject poverty.

This is not the rest of the world, this is the wealthiest nation on earth

I am sure that those people are quite happy living it that house. Its certainly better than living under a bridge in Calcutta with 1500 other people and eating out of a garbage dump.

but maybe Pelosi or Gore has room for them in their mansions, or maybe the obama's or Whoopi can put them in their guest rooms.

You libs post this crap but never criticize your leaders who live in mansions and fly on private planes. How about Maxine Waters who represents the poorest district in LA but does not live in her district but instead lives in a mansion with the hollywood loonies as neighbors.

you libs are the biggest hypocrites in the history of the world.

Trump claims that he is the most (insert anything here) and you sycophant after it.

Republics claim to be for law and order, but that’s just when they’re out of power.

Republics claim to be deficit hawks, but that only when they’re out of power.

Republics claim to have higher moral standards, but still support men who cheat and divorce.

Since when do libs consider cheating and divorce to be "immoral"?

It was liberal policy which gave America its free and easy divorce laws, and no lib wants to change them.

And the Libs salute Bill Clinton as a moral role model for Americans and even JFK who was documented to have had 3-somes with his brother RFK and Marilyn Monroe.

 

[rightwinger]

We do not need to redistribute wealth as much as stop an economic system built around supply side economics. It does not work. Why are we helping people who obviously don’t need it when there are so many who do?

We should help those who are unable to help themselves because of mental or physical limitations. Everyone else should be responsible for his or her life and welfare.

Funny isn't it that republicans and conservatives give much more to charity than democrats and liberals. Could it be that liberals do not practice what they preach?

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
There is no reason some people should live in abject poverty

the poor in the US are much better off than the middle class in the rest of the world. Many of our homeless are homeless by choice, not because of anything the government has, or has not, done. There is no "abject poverty" in the USA today. If you want to see abject poverty go to Calcutta India or Guatamala, or parts of Mexico. You have no idea what abject poverty is if you think the people living on the sidewalks of our big cities are living in abject poverty.

This is not the rest of the world, this is the wealthiest nation on earth

I am sure that those people are quite happy living it that house. Its certainly better than living under a bridge in Calcutta with 1500 other people and eating out of a garbage dump.

but maybe Pelosi or Gore has room for them in their mansions, or maybe the obama's or Whoopi can put them in their guest rooms.

You libs post this crap but never criticize your leaders who live in mansions and fly on private planes. How about Maxine Waters who represents the poorest district in LA but does not live in her district but instead lives in a mansion with the hollywood loonies as neighbors.

you libs are the biggest hypocrites in the history of the world.

Again, if our poverty standard is Calcutta, we are in sorry shape

Maxine Waters May live in a mansion but is fighting to improve the standard of living in her district

Republicans who live in mansions fight to protect the wealthy while they slash programs to help the poor and hold down wages

 

[rightwinger]

Can you tell me if they were liberal??

Was George Wallace and Bull Connor along side of those liberal hippies from up north -- marching along side of King??

Can you tell me if Strom Thurman was some radical leftist?? and then when he got older, became conservative??

You do understand the reason dic suckers like you say "democrat" and "republican" is because you too dishonest to use the words "conservative" and "liberal" -- because you are too dishonest to admit that conservatives HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST THE EMANCIPATION EFFORT OF EVERY HISTORICALLY OPPRESSED GROUP -- and it leaves you morons to have to play these words games years after the fact.....because when the true fight was being fought, no conservatives were there marching along side of MLK...

Which is why you can't name one

The GOP of Eisenhower and Nixon, and Reagan, all had excellent Civil RIghts records, and they were all conservative. YOur claims are absurd.

Eisenhower and Nixon did

Reagan used blacks to build his base

Eisenhower could have done much more for Civil Rights while he was President

THank you for admitting that Eisenhower and Nixon, two conservative REpublicans, had fine civil rights records.


Your claim about Reagan, is simply wrong. Reagan is more recent and thus more timely, thus you can't admit it yet. Give it another 20 years, and once it become moot, more of you libs will be ready to stop lying about him too.

Ike was a country club republican and Nixon a paranoid piece of shit.


Both refused to meet with MLK which is why he switched party allegiance from republic to Democratic in the 1950s.

the civil rights bill of 1964 would not have passed without republican votes, a majority of democrats voted against it.

Wouldn’t have passed without Democratic votes and being signed into law by a Democratic President

 

[Redfish]

We should help those who are unable to help themselves because of mental or physical limitations. Everyone else should be responsible for his or her life and welfare.

Funny isn't it that republicans and conservatives give much more to charity than democrats and liberals. Could it be that liberals do not practice what they preach?

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
There is no reason some people should live in abject poverty

the poor in the US are much better off than the middle class in the rest of the world. Many of our homeless are homeless by choice, not because of anything the government has, or has not, done. There is no "abject poverty" in the USA today. If you want to see abject poverty go to Calcutta India or Guatamala, or parts of Mexico. You have no idea what abject poverty is if you think the people living on the sidewalks of our big cities are living in abject poverty.

This is not the rest of the world, this is the wealthiest nation on earth

I am sure that those people are quite happy living it that house. Its certainly better than living under a bridge in Calcutta with 1500 other people and eating out of a garbage dump.

but maybe Pelosi or Gore has room for them in their mansions, or maybe the obama's or Whoopi can put them in their guest rooms.

You libs post this crap but never criticize your leaders who live in mansions and fly on private planes. How about Maxine Waters who represents the poorest district in LA but does not live in her district but instead lives in a mansion with the hollywood loonies as neighbors.

you libs are the biggest hypocrites in the history of the world.

Trump claims that he is the most (insert anything here) and you sycophant after it.

Republics claim to be for law and order, but that’s just when they’re out of power.

Republics claim to be deficit hawks, but that only when they’re out of power.

Republics claim to have higher moral standards, but still support men who cheat and divorce.

so are you trying to say that republicans supported bill clinton, obama, avenatti, Weinstein, Epstein, blaggo, pelosi, hillary clinton, CNN, MSNBC, NY times, etc???? Are you claiming that republicans support sanctuary cities. open borders, welfare for illegals? are you claiming that republicans supported obama doubling the national debt in 8 years?

Its amazing how you accuse others of doing what your party has done for years.

 

[Redfish]

The GOP of Eisenhower and Nixon, and Reagan, all had excellent Civil RIghts records, and they were all conservative. YOur claims are absurd.

Eisenhower and Nixon did

Reagan used blacks to build his base

Eisenhower could have done much more for Civil Rights while he was President

THank you for admitting that Eisenhower and Nixon, two conservative REpublicans, had fine civil rights records.


Your claim about Reagan, is simply wrong. Reagan is more recent and thus more timely, thus you can't admit it yet. Give it another 20 years, and once it become moot, more of you libs will be ready to stop lying about him too.

Ike was a country club republican and Nixon a paranoid piece of shit.


Both refused to meet with MLK which is why he switched party allegiance from republic to Democratic in the 1950s.

the civil rights bill of 1964 would not have passed without republican votes, a majority of democrats voted against it.

Wouldn’t have passed without Democratic votes and being signed into law by a Democratic President

yes, Johnson did sign it and some dems voted for it. Why don't you look up the congressional vote count and report back to us?

LBJ was one of the most racist presidents in our history, he was also a pervert and was involved in the murder of JFK. If you want to make him a hero, thats up to you, but he was a terrible human being.

 

[Redfish]

We should help those who are unable to help themselves because of mental or physical limitations. Everyone else should be responsible for his or her life and welfare.

Funny isn't it that republicans and conservatives give much more to charity than democrats and liberals. Could it be that liberals do not practice what they preach?

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
There is no reason some people should live in abject poverty

the poor in the US are much better off than the middle class in the rest of the world. Many of our homeless are homeless by choice, not because of anything the government has, or has not, done. There is no "abject poverty" in the USA today. If you want to see abject poverty go to Calcutta India or Guatamala, or parts of Mexico. You have no idea what abject poverty is if you think the people living on the sidewalks of our big cities are living in abject poverty.

This is not the rest of the world, this is the wealthiest nation on earth

I am sure that those people are quite happy living it that house. Its certainly better than living under a bridge in Calcutta with 1500 other people and eating out of a garbage dump.

but maybe Pelosi or Gore has room for them in their mansions, or maybe the obama's or Whoopi can put them in their guest rooms.

You libs post this crap but never criticize your leaders who live in mansions and fly on private planes. How about Maxine Waters who represents the poorest district in LA but does not live in her district but instead lives in a mansion with the hollywood loonies as neighbors.

you libs are the biggest hypocrites in the history of the world.

Again, if our poverty standard is Calcutta, we are in sorry shape

Maxine Waters May live in a mansion but is fighting to improve the standard of living in her district

Republicans who live in mansions fight to protect the wealthy while they slash programs to help the poor and hold down wages

LOL, you just can't deal with reality can you? Maxine has done nothing for the people she represents, much like Jackson-Lee who represents the most poverty filled district of Houston while living in a mansion in the suburbs and living the high life.

Why are you unable to see the flaws in democrats?

 

[rightwinger]

Eisenhower and Nixon did

Reagan used blacks to build his base

Eisenhower could have done much more for Civil Rights while he was President

THank you for admitting that Eisenhower and Nixon, two conservative REpublicans, had fine civil rights records.


Your claim about Reagan, is simply wrong. Reagan is more recent and thus more timely, thus you can't admit it yet. Give it another 20 years, and once it become moot, more of you libs will be ready to stop lying about him too.

Ike was a country club republican and Nixon a paranoid piece of shit.


Both refused to meet with MLK which is why he switched party allegiance from republic to Democratic in the 1950s.

the civil rights bill of 1964 would not have passed without republican votes, a majority of democrats voted against it.

Wouldn’t have passed without Democratic votes and being signed into law by a Democratic President

yes, Johnson did sign it and some dems voted for it. Why don't you look up the congressional vote count and report back to us?

LBJ was one of the most racist presidents in our history, he was also a pervert and was involved in the murder of JFK. If you want to make him a hero, thats up to you, but he was a terrible human being.

LBJ did more for Civil Rights than any President since Lincoln

 

[rightwinger]

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
There is no reason some people should live in abject poverty

the poor in the US are much better off than the middle class in the rest of the world. Many of our homeless are homeless by choice, not because of anything the government has, or has not, done. There is no "abject poverty" in the USA today. If you want to see abject poverty go to Calcutta India or Guatamala, or parts of Mexico. You have no idea what abject poverty is if you think the people living on the sidewalks of our big cities are living in abject poverty.

This is not the rest of the world, this is the wealthiest nation on earth

I am sure that those people are quite happy living it that house. Its certainly better than living under a bridge in Calcutta with 1500 other people and eating out of a garbage dump.

but maybe Pelosi or Gore has room for them in their mansions, or maybe the obama's or Whoopi can put them in their guest rooms.

You libs post this crap but never criticize your leaders who live in mansions and fly on private planes. How about Maxine Waters who represents the poorest district in LA but does not live in her district but instead lives in a mansion with the hollywood loonies as neighbors.

you libs are the biggest hypocrites in the history of the world.

Again, if our poverty standard is Calcutta, we are in sorry shape

Maxine Waters May live in a mansion but is fighting to improve the standard of living in her district

Republicans who live in mansions fight to protect the wealthy while they slash programs to help the poor and hold down wages

LOL, you just can't deal with reality can you? Maxine has done nothing for the people she represents, much like Jackson-Lee who represents the most poverty filled district of Houston while living in a mansion in the suburbs and living the high life.

Why are you unable to see the flaws in democrats?

Sure she has
She supports legislation for social programs, education, healthcare...all of which help her constituents

Republican millionaires support programs that help fellow millionaires

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Can you tell me if they were liberal??

Was George Wallace and Bull Connor along side of those liberal hippies from up north -- marching along side of King??

Can you tell me if Strom Thurman was some radical leftist?? and then when he got older, became conservative??

You do understand the reason dic suckers like you say "democrat" and "republican" is because you too dishonest to use the words "conservative" and "liberal" -- because you are too dishonest to admit that conservatives HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST THE EMANCIPATION EFFORT OF EVERY HISTORICALLY OPPRESSED GROUP -- and it leaves you morons to have to play these words games years after the fact.....because when the true fight was being fought, no conservatives were there marching along side of MLK...

Which is why you can't name one

The GOP of Eisenhower and Nixon, and Reagan, all had excellent Civil RIghts records, and they were all conservative. YOur claims are absurd.

Eisenhower and Nixon did

Reagan used blacks to build his base

Eisenhower could have done much more for Civil Rights while he was President

THank you for admitting that Eisenhower and Nixon, two conservative REpublicans, had fine civil rights records.


Your claim about Reagan, is simply wrong. Reagan is more recent and thus more timely, thus you can't admit it yet. Give it another 20 years, and once it become moot, more of you libs will be ready to stop lying about him too.

Ike was a country club republican and Nixon a paranoid piece of shit.


Both refused to meet with MLK which is why he switched party allegiance from republic to Democratic in the 1950s.

the civil rights bill of 1964 would not have passed without republican votes, a majority of democrats voted against it.

Of course..as any thinking person knows..the 'Republicans' and the 'Democrats' of the time were constituted quite differently than today and that, in fact, it was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was the final straw for many conservative Democrats and led to their flight to the Republican party.

Also..Eisenhower presided over Jim Crow--he gets Zilch from me..as far as credit is concerned. Reagan..well..at least he didn't get in the way..which is about the best that can be said. Reagan was post-Jim Crow though..and his record in California, when Civil rights was the issue...as Governor..was nothing to speak of.

 

[Desperado]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

 

[rightwinger]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

 

[otto105]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

Cracker

 

[basquebromance]

Dr. King was somehow so much more than the legend he has become.⠀
⠀
He was a democratic socialist, a believer in radical love, and a fierce critic of US militarism, materialism, and racism. ⠀
⠀
We should all strive to follow the radical legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

 

[Polishprince]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

King got whacked standing on a motel balcony in a tough part of town, that's a far cry from being shot in a war.

Dr. King was unfortunately denied a carry permit, so he was defenseless when James Ray capped his ass.

 

[Desperado]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

King got whacked standing on a motel balcony in a tough part of town, that's a far cry from being shot in a war.

Dr. King was unfortunately denied a carry permit, so he was defenseless when James Ray capped his ass.

Do you actually believe if King had a carry permit it would have changed anything?

 

[rightwinger]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

King got whacked standing on a motel balcony in a tough part of town, that's a far cry from being shot in a war.

Dr. King was unfortunately denied a carry permit, so he was defenseless when James Ray capped his ass.

He was shot because he was an American Patriot daring to fight for liberty and freedom

 

[Polishprince]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

King got whacked standing on a motel balcony in a tough part of town, that's a far cry from being shot in a war.

Dr. King was unfortunately denied a carry permit, so he was defenseless when James Ray capped his ass.

He was shot because he was an American Patriot daring to fight for liberty and freedom

When did Mr. Ray say that was the reason he had for whacking Dr. King? Do you have a link?

 

[otto105]

MLK was assassinated because white people refused to live to values they claim in our Founding Document.

 

[Polishprince]

MLK was assassinated because white people refused to live to values they claim in our Founding Document.

MLK was clipped by one person, a pathetic loser by the name of James E. Ray. How can you blame his death on all "white people"?

 

[rightwinger]

MLK was nothing but a phony reverend con man looking to make a buck. Not much different than the ones we have today.
When he was shot seems the government wanted to make in a martyr a to keep the blacks from rioting.

An American Patriot who ultimately gave his life for our country

King got whacked standing on a motel balcony in a tough part of town, that's a far cry from being shot in a war.

Dr. King was unfortunately denied a carry permit, so he was defenseless when James Ray capped his ass.

He was shot because he was an American Patriot daring to fight for liberty and freedom

When did Mr. Ray say that was the reason he had for whacking Dr. King? Do you have a link?

Honest...it was an accident