DPRK is Next

Discussion in 'Asia' started by wonderwench, Mar 13, 2004.

  1. wonderwench
    Online

    wonderwench Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    US warns NKorea to stop exporting dangerous weapons or face world action

    This should make all of those people who hyperventilate that Bush should have attacked the DPRK instead of Iraq happy. But it won't - they'll just argue that some other country (my guess is Iran) is a greater threat.


    The United States warned North Korea that it would face action from the international community if it does not stop exporting dangerous weapons and other illegal activities.

    "If North Korea will not act, it will find the United States, its allies and other partners equally prepared to respond with measures that ensure North Korea cannot threaten our countries or international stability," said Mitchell Reiss, the department's director of policy planning.

    Speaking at the Heritage Foundation, one of Washington's leading repositories of expertise on East Asia, Reiss said the United States was taking steps to enforce its laws against alleged narcotics trafficking and counterfeiting of US currency by the rogue state.

    He said these steps were ongoing and unrelated to the current six-party negotiations -- which include North and South Korea, Japan, the United States, China and Russia -- to ease the nuclear standoff in North Korea.

    "We are entitled to expect legal behaviour from all countries.

    "With or without a denuclearization agreement, North Korea must cease its exports of dangerous weapons and the wide scope of its illegal activities," Reiss said.

    Washington would also pursue with its so called proliferation security initiative, a programme to counter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and missiles, he said.

    "We will insist on full accountability by the North Korean regime and its agents for their behaviour," Reiss said. "The choice, ultimately, is theirs."

    If North Korea rises to the occasion and abandons its "self destructive and dangerous path, it can begin to work with the United States and the other nations in the nuclear talks to enable its diplomatic and economic integration into the global system.

    The six party talks are due to resume in Beijing by the end of June after the last round in the Chinese capital in February fizzled out with only an agreement to establish working groups to study the problem.

    The talks failed to resolve differences over the core US demand for the complete dismantling of the secretive Stalinist country's nuclear programmes.

    North Korea called the US demand "criminal" and said progress was impossible because of "the fundamental difference between the DPRK and the US in their stands."

    North Korea and the United States have been locked in the impasse since Washington accused the Stalinist state in October 2002 of having a program to enrich uranium in defiance of a 1994 anti-nuclear pact.

    The United States considers the 1994 deal ruptured and suspended fuel oil shipments to North Korea.

    North Korea has denied having an enriched uranium program but admits it has plutonium bombs.

    Pyongyang has sought security guarantees and economic aid in return for denuclearization while Washington has insisted that a verifiable dismantling of the Stalinist state's nuclear program come first.
     
  2. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    lets make the bet! 5 years and well be in NK
     
  3. wonderwench
    Online

    wonderwench Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm not sure we will actually have to attack the DPRK. The Bushies are putting Kim Jong Il on notice - and the 6 nations are going to put enormous pressure on him to comply.
     
  4. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    we have the resources to do it. we cant be having a nut case run around with nukes. well any more nut cases running around with them at any rate
     
  5. wonderwench
    Online

    wonderwench Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    North Korea is a net food importer. Kim Jong Il's possession of nukes is more useful as a threat to blackmail other countries for foreign aid. At the point he actually uses them - he risks the withdrawal of food support. Then the military will have to be used to subdue the starving civilian population and his regime will be very easy to topple.

    I doubt he will risk this scenario.
     
  6. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    if he were to use them, its a whole new ball game. he jsut opened the door for what ever country he used them on to respond in kind.
     
  7. wonderwench
    Online

    wonderwench Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Any totalitarian ruler who uses nukes is signing his own death warrant.
     
  8. Johnney
    Offline

    Johnney Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,330
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ratings:
    +141
    he thinks he can strong arm the US. that crap aint going to work. were the ones who strong arm, not a third world country like NK. the only thing hes doing is making it harder for everyoen trying to help him. lets face it, no one wants to see anyone starve. least of all innocents that are only told and (if they) believe what they are being fed about other countries.
     

Share This Page