Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And yet here you are, attempting to tell another human being what they are, with your labels. Insisting your vision is the correct one for a fellow himan being. Below is an all encompassing list of what you're in charge of in the lives of others. Study it.
That about sums it up.
Obviously I overestimated your ability to understand simple concepts. My bad. I won't bother you with it anymore. If your wife ever sleeps with another man, and tells you she's not a cheater, and you have no right to tell her what she is.... then maybe you'll figure this out.
The only "responsibility" any corporation ever had was to its share holders, it is pretty simple. Your analogies are really weird son.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity?
You got your answer, you didn't like it.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Obviously I overestimated your ability to understand simple concepts. My bad. I won't bother you with it anymore. If your wife ever sleeps with another man, and tells you she's not a cheater, and you have no right to tell her what she is.... then maybe you'll figure this out.
The only "responsibility" any corporation ever had was to its share holders, it is pretty simple. Your analogies are really weird son.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity?
You got your answer, you didn't like it.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
The only "responsibility" any corporation ever had was to its share holders, it is pretty simple. Your analogies are really weird son.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity?
You got your answer, you didn't like it.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
Another typical left-wing debate tactic. Ask a straight forward question, and get a completely off-the-wall has nothing to do with anything we have discussed thus far, answer.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity? Yes or no, question. Yes or no are the only two valid responses. Can you answer the question or not?
Moreover, have you ever heard me at any point, suggest that I supported socializing losses for Wall Street? If not, then why are you bringing up something I never supported? Only way to deflect your failure at the original question?
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity?
You got your answer, you didn't like it.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
Another typical left-wing debate tactic. Ask a straight forward question, and get a completely off-the-wall has nothing to do with anything we have discussed thus far, answer.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity? Yes or no, question. Yes or no are the only two valid responses. Can you answer the question or not?
Moreover, have you ever heard me at any point, suggest that I supported socializing losses for Wall Street? If not, then why are you bringing up something I never supported? Only way to deflect your failure at the original question?
I'm not debating you son.
You got your answer, you didn't like it.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
Another typical left-wing debate tactic. Ask a straight forward question, and get a completely off-the-wall has nothing to do with anything we have discussed thus far, answer.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity? Yes or no, question. Yes or no are the only two valid responses. Can you answer the question or not?
Moreover, have you ever heard me at any point, suggest that I supported socializing losses for Wall Street? If not, then why are you bringing up something I never supported? Only way to deflect your failure at the original question?
I'm not debating you son.
As if that's a news flash. I've been waiting now 20 posts for you to even make one logical argument. Maybe you should find something else to do with your time gramps. Maybe you should trying making a bird feeder at your retirement village.
Yes or no. Those are the only two answers, and you have not answered yet.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
Another typical left-wing debate tactic. Ask a straight forward question, and get a completely off-the-wall has nothing to do with anything we have discussed thus far, answer.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity? Yes or no, question. Yes or no are the only two valid responses. Can you answer the question or not?
Moreover, have you ever heard me at any point, suggest that I supported socializing losses for Wall Street? If not, then why are you bringing up something I never supported? Only way to deflect your failure at the original question?
I'm not debating you son.
As if that's a news flash. I've been waiting now 20 posts for you to even make one logical argument. Maybe you should find something else to do with your time gramps. Maybe you should trying making a bird feeder at your retirement village.
See that's part of your problem right there, you think you're in charge of something.
Ah you strict dualists, here's your system pard:
Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street/bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
Another typical left-wing debate tactic. Ask a straight forward question, and get a completely off-the-wall has nothing to do with anything we have discussed thus far, answer.
Yes or no, did Amazon investing $1.1 Billion into Columbus Ohio, and creating hundreds of high paying jobs, create wealth, growth, jobs and prosperity? Yes or no, question. Yes or no are the only two valid responses. Can you answer the question or not?
Moreover, have you ever heard me at any point, suggest that I supported socializing losses for Wall Street? If not, then why are you bringing up something I never supported? Only way to deflect your failure at the original question?
I'm not debating you son.
As if that's a news flash. I've been waiting now 20 posts for you to even make one logical argument. Maybe you should find something else to do with your time gramps. Maybe you should trying making a bird feeder at your retirement village.
See that's part of your problem right there, you think you're in charge of something.
It was a suggestion, since you obviously have no value to any discussion on this forum. No one is paying any attention to you, except for me, and I am realizing that you are a waste of my time old man.
I don't know when the older generation got so useless, that they have no wisdom to pass on, but its clear the mind-rot runs deep in you old people.
If you don't know how the ignore feature on this forum works, I'll explain. When I place you on ignore, all of your posts, all quotes of your posts, everything about you, will cease to exist.
I've seen people like you before. You come on here, mouth off, and never make any points, deflect evade, and throw red herrings everywhere. Then over time, you find no one ever talks to you. No one answers any of your posts. You wonder if no one can see anything you say. The answer is, no one can. They have all ignored you.
Which is what I just did. I'll never see your posts again. You are waste of time. You haven't had one reasonable, or intelligent answer yet. You can't even answer one single yes or no question. A person that incompetent is nothing more than a smudge on the forums, that I can wipe away with the ignore feature.
In the future, it would be in your own best interest to not be so childish in the future, if you wish your thoughts to be heard and considered. No one will put up with a 60-year-old toddler for long.
Good bye smudge. You were brief, but useless, and will be easily forgotten now that you are ignored. Bye bye.
