Trump Donald Trump possesses many of the same attributes as our famous WW2 field commander.

Trump has investments in so many different countries that it would be no problem at all for a foreign nation to pay him for various, ahem, services.
 
It's hell in Syria,Obama is not a good commander in chef, he has the last word...you don't do war that way and when we think that we will may be stuck with Hillary for another 4 years.........disaster

What way would you be doing war in the Syria if you were the Commander in Chief?

I am just curious.
 
Well you're responses show that you are a ostrich who know nothing about the strategy to come after a conflict a war that's why you can not respect someone like Patton because you are a wimp the kind of person who is completely superficial that looks at his little person every day.

You don't even know how to use a reply button. And clearly you know only the comic book version of Patton.

George Patton was a larger than life character who was a brilliant tank commander- but a very imperfect strategic commander. He was an anti-semite at a time when Americans were finding out about Hitler's final solution.

Patton was a real soldier though- the closest Trump got to 'war' was fighting his own personal Vietnam against STD's in the 1970's. Patton volunteered to fight- Trump purposely avoided going into the military and going to war.

Before you go comparing Trump to Patton- read up on Patton- warts and all.
 
Besides maybe the stuff about political incorrectness, I see absolutely no similarity.

If Patton commanded his armies like Trump runs his businesses, most of you would be learning German in school as a mandatory subject.

Well both Patton and Trump had/have huge ego's.

But if Trump had been commanding the Third Army, he would have insisted the tanks all be labeled as "Trump's Tanks"
Well some tank like you say have often symbolic name on it...Trump déserve it.

Oh yes- if Trump was in charge of tanks there is no doubt he would believe he deserved having his name first and foremost on the tanks.
Well yes, you don't have enough of this no good Obama this Président who does some war in Syria but not completly just in half ( no troop on the ground ) and leave the people deal with there lost and the fear ? that better for you ?

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat. But suddenly progressives are for unnecessary wars, they have to pretend they care about some oppressed Muslims. Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.

The policy for the Middle East should be to stay out of Muslim countries and let them handle their own affairs. Let them kill each other, that's what they are best at. If they also attack the US or allies, then bomb the hell out of them and don't apologize for it. If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did.
 
Besides maybe the stuff about political incorrectness, I see absolutely no similarity.

If Patton commanded his armies like Trump runs his businesses, most of you would be learning German in school as a mandatory subject.

Well both Patton and Trump had/have huge ego's.

But if Trump had been commanding the Third Army, he would have insisted the tanks all be labeled as "Trump's Tanks"
Well some tank like you say have often symbolic name on it...Trump déserve it.

Oh yes- if Trump was in charge of tanks there is no doubt he would believe he deserved having his name first and foremost on the tanks.
Well yes, you don't have enough of this no good Obama this Président who does some war in Syria but not completly just in half ( no troop on the ground ) and leave the people deal with there lost and the fear ? that better for you ?

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat. But suddenly progressives are for unnecessary wars, they have to pretend they care about some oppressed Muslims. Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.

The policy for the Middle East should be to stay out of Muslim countries and let them handle their own affairs. Let them kill each other, that's what they are best at. If they also attack the US or allies, then bomb the hell out of them and don't apologize for it. If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did.

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat.

President Obama didn't make the citizens of Syria revolt. The revolution happened- started off peacefully and then after the troops of Assad attacked the protesters it turned violent.

As far as Syria 'never attacking us or ever a threat'- Syria was- and is a sponsor of terrorism. Syria has sponsored anti-Israeli terrorists for decades- Syria was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979.
Chapter 3 -- State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview
Cuba, Iran, and Syria, however, have not renounced terrorism or made efforts to act against Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Iran and Syria routinely provided safe haven, substantial resources, and guidance to terrorist organizations.

I understand- you think the United States shouldn't act against states who sponsor terrorism. This state however was both a threat to our ally, Israel, and was barrel bombing its own citizens. If we had not been involved, Syria might have had more time to help terrorists attack Western targets

Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.


Yet we have example after example from the last 60 years of Muslims revolting against dictators.

If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did

So you think the United States should just use our military power to steal oil- and then keep our troops in the Middle East guarding oil fields with big targets on their backs?
 
Well both Patton and Trump had/have huge ego's.

But if Trump had been commanding the Third Army, he would have insisted the tanks all be labeled as "Trump's Tanks"
Well some tank like you say have often symbolic name on it...Trump déserve it.

Oh yes- if Trump was in charge of tanks there is no doubt he would believe he deserved having his name first and foremost on the tanks.
Well yes, you don't have enough of this no good Obama this Président who does some war in Syria but not completly just in half ( no troop on the ground ) and leave the people deal with there lost and the fear ? that better for you ?

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat. But suddenly progressives are for unnecessary wars, they have to pretend they care about some oppressed Muslims. Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.

The policy for the Middle East should be to stay out of Muslim countries and let them handle their own affairs. Let them kill each other, that's what they are best at. If they also attack the US or allies, then bomb the hell out of them and don't apologize for it. If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did.

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat.

President Obama didn't make the citizens of Syria revolt. The revolution happened- started off peacefully and then after the troops of Assad attacked the protesters it turned violent.

As far as Syria 'never attacking us or ever a threat'- Syria was- and is a sponsor of terrorism. Syria has sponsored anti-Israeli terrorists for decades- Syria was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979.
Chapter 3 -- State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview
Cuba, Iran, and Syria, however, have not renounced terrorism or made efforts to act against Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Iran and Syria routinely provided safe haven, substantial resources, and guidance to terrorist organizations.

I understand- you think the United States shouldn't act against states who sponsor terrorism. This state however was both a threat to our ally, Israel, and was barrel bombing its own citizens. If we had not been involved, Syria might have had more time to help terrorists attack Western targets

Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.


Yet we have example after example from the last 60 years of Muslims revolting against dictators.

If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did

So you think the United States should just use our military power to steal oil- and then keep our troops in the Middle East guarding oil fields with big targets on their backs?


It's irrelevant if the Syrian people revolted against the Syrian government. What business is it of ours? None.

If we attacked Syria because they are a "state sponsor" of terrorism, then why didn't we attack Iran, as well as every other terror sponsor out there? Why not the actual terror group they sponsor? That's the lamest excuse I've heard yet.

Since Obama decided to fund the Sunni side of the rebellion, he is in fact fueling ISIS, since they are Sunni. The mess also created the Syrian refugee crisis, which has created an even bigger terror threat to the West. Only it is not the Shi'ite backed terror groups that you claim are a big threat to the West, but Sunni nutjobs, the ones we're "helping". It's also not just a "threat" of terrorism, there have been so many Sunni terror attacks in Europe and even in the states, it's now the new normal for attacks to happen on a monthly basis.

By all means, please provide examples of Muslims revolting against a dictator, and implementing some kind of real democracy that isn't as oppressive as any of the dictatorships.

I think the US military should stay out of Middle East affairs, unless we are attacked or there is a real threat. Then if we wage war, we don't do it half assed like a Bush and Obama. Destroy them, take their source of funding (oil), and forget any nation building shit or patrolling their streets like policemen. So no, they wouldn't have a target on them.
 
Well some tank like you say have often symbolic name on it...Trump déserve it.

Oh yes- if Trump was in charge of tanks there is no doubt he would believe he deserved having his name first and foremost on the tanks.
Well yes, you don't have enough of this no good Obama this Président who does some war in Syria but not completly just in half ( no troop on the ground ) and leave the people deal with there lost and the fear ? that better for you ?

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat. But suddenly progressives are for unnecessary wars, they have to pretend they care about some oppressed Muslims. Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.

The policy for the Middle East should be to stay out of Muslim countries and let them handle their own affairs. Let them kill each other, that's what they are best at. If they also attack the US or allies, then bomb the hell out of them and don't apologize for it. If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did.

Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat.

President Obama didn't make the citizens of Syria revolt. The revolution happened- started off peacefully and then after the troops of Assad attacked the protesters it turned violent.

As far as Syria 'never attacking us or ever a threat'- Syria was- and is a sponsor of terrorism. Syria has sponsored anti-Israeli terrorists for decades- Syria was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979.
Chapter 3 -- State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview
Cuba, Iran, and Syria, however, have not renounced terrorism or made efforts to act against Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Iran and Syria routinely provided safe haven, substantial resources, and guidance to terrorist organizations.

I understand- you think the United States shouldn't act against states who sponsor terrorism. This state however was both a threat to our ally, Israel, and was barrel bombing its own citizens. If we had not been involved, Syria might have had more time to help terrorists attack Western targets

Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.


Yet we have example after example from the last 60 years of Muslims revolting against dictators.

If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did

So you think the United States should just use our military power to steal oil- and then keep our troops in the Middle East guarding oil fields with big targets on their backs?


It's irrelevant if the Syrian people revolted against the Syrian government. What business is it of ours? None.

If we attacked Syria because they are a "state sponsor" of terrorism, then why didn't we attack Iran, as well as every other terror sponsor out there? Why not the actual terror group they sponsor? That's the lamest excuse I've heard yet.

Since Obama decided to fund the Sunni side of the rebellion, he is in fact fueling ISIS, since they are Sunni. The mess also created the Syrian refugee crisis, which has created an even bigger terror threat to the West. Only it is not the Shi'ite backed terror groups that you claim are a big threat to the West, but Sunni nutjobs, the ones we're "helping". It's also not just a "threat" of terrorism, there have been so many Sunni terror attacks in Europe and even in the states, it's now the new normal for attacks to happen on a monthly basis.

By all means, please provide examples of Muslims revolting against a dictator, and implementing some kind of real democracy that isn't as oppressive as any of the dictatorships.

I think the US military should stay out of Middle East affairs, unless we are attacked or there is a real threat. Then if we wage war, we don't do it half assed like a Bush and Obama. Destroy them, take their source of funding (oil), and forget any nation building shit or patrolling their streets like policemen. So no, they wouldn't have a target on them.

It's irrelevant if the Syrian people revolted against the Syrian government. What business is it of ours? None.

It is relevant when you blame Barack Obama for the mess in Syria. Syria had been labeled a state sponsor of terrorism for decades- and suddenly his own citizens were calling for his removal. Yes it made sense to encourage the removal of a dictator who was encouraging terrorism in the world.

If we attacked Syria because they are a "state sponsor" of terrorism, then why didn't we attack Iran, as well as every other terror sponsor out there? Why not the actual terror group they sponsor? That's the lamest excuse I've heard yet.

We didn't attack Syria.

Since Obama decided to fund the Sunni side of the rebellion, he is in fact fueling ISIS, since they are Sunni.

President Obama decided to fund the opposition rebels- which included a myriad of groups- including Sunni's. Only an idiot would think that all Sunni's are ISIS.

The mess also created the Syrian refugee crisis, which has created an even bigger terror threat to the West. Only it is not the Shi'ite backed terror groups that you claim are a big threat to the West,

Sigh. The Syrian refugee crisis is very real- and yes that is what Civil war does. But President Obama didn't start the Syrian Civil War. But I do get what you are saying- if President Obama got out of the way and let the Assad regime murder all of the refugees they wouldn't be bothering you so much.

By all means, please provide examples of Muslims revolting against a dictator, and implementing some kind of real democracy that isn't as oppressive as any of the dictatorships.

Tunisia is the only country to emerge from the Arab revolutions of 2011 as a functioning democracy. Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, and Syria have returned to dictatorship, descended into chaos, or both. But in Tunisia a democratically chosen assembly passed a progressive constitution in 2014, and three rounds of free and fair elections have taken place. S
 
Well you're responses show that you are a ostrich who know nothing about the strategy to come after a conflict a war that's why you can not respect someone like Patton because you are a wimp the kind of person who is completely superficial that looks at his little person every day.
your banal hero Trump avoided going to War and ti compare him to General Patton,only goes to show how ignorant you are,you have infact defiled the name of your American War Hero,Patton, comparing that NON PAYING SEXUAL WIERDO TRUMP to him...IDIOT
 
you someone so so soft so weak and it is because of this that the United States will continue to be a country that has lost its strength you compare as you wish to take only the history of pussy locked room talking that has no relationship with Trump and what he could do against the terrorist despatch you to go vote for Hillary the one that will do the same that Obama pull your country down. you are so weak. no balls.
It is you who is really stupid and do not understand what happens in this world.
Look at yourself in the mirror and continue to be proud to be a wimp.that very good for you're country first World power that will be led by a criminal wimp.
 
Well you're responses show that you are a ostrich who know nothing about the strategy to come after a conflict a war that's why you can not respect someone like Patton because you are a wimp the kind of person who is completely superficial that looks at his little person every day.

You don't even know how to use a reply button. And clearly you know only the comic book version of Patton.

George Patton was a larger than life character who was a brilliant tank commander- but a very imperfect strategic commander. He was an anti-semite at a time when Americans were finding out about Hitler's final solution.

Patton was a real soldier though- the closest Trump got to 'war' was fighting his own personal Vietnam against STD's in the 1970's. Patton volunteered to fight- Trump purposely avoided going into the military and going to war.

Before you go comparing Trump to Patton- read up on Patton- warts and all.
You are so funny you follow me where i go at the forum just to défend Obama if i was you i will be a shame of been so next to the plate and having my eyes closed open it a little bit for a moment ?
The shit in the middle east now it because of you're " chouchou" did you know it start with
the withdrawal of troops in 2011 by Obama (that the way he work facing the terror, King ostriches ) and it was a treat for them terrorists they are served.
That's it, right? let things be and see how many deaths it will have ?
 
Last edited:
Patton would have slapped Trump
Yes you are rigth for the way he act with women...he as all is chance to win the élection but the fact he had wandering hands , it's finish for him..listen DSK it would have made a very good French President but he was a leading pig.
 
Well you're responses show that you are a ostrich who know nothing about the strategy to come after a conflict a war that's why you can not respect someone like Patton because you are a wimp the kind of person who is completely superficial that looks at his little person every day.

You don't even know how to use a reply button. And clearly you know only the comic book version of Patton.

George Patton was a larger than life character who was a brilliant tank commander- but a very imperfect strategic commander. He was an anti-semite at a time when Americans were finding out about Hitler's final solution.

Patton was a real soldier though- the closest Trump got to 'war' was fighting his own personal Vietnam against STD's in the 1970's. Patton volunteered to fight- Trump purposely avoided going into the military and going to war.

Before you go comparing Trump to Patton- read up on Patton- warts and all.
You are so funny you follow me where i go at the forum

I go to threads that look like they are stupid and then post about how stupid the thread is.

I am not following you- your threads just are all asinine.
 
Well you're responses show that you are a ostrich who know nothing about the strategy to come after a conflict a war that's why you can not respect someone like Patton because you are a wimp the kind of person who is completely superficial that looks at his little person every day.

You don't even know how to use a reply button. And clearly you know only the comic book version of Patton.

George Patton was a larger than life character who was a brilliant tank commander- but a very imperfect strategic commander. He was an anti-semite at a time when Americans were finding out about Hitler's final solution.

Patton was a real soldier though- the closest Trump got to 'war' was fighting his own personal Vietnam against STD's in the 1970's. Patton volunteered to fight- Trump purposely avoided going into the military and going to war.

Before you go comparing Trump to Patton- read up on Patton- warts and all.
You are so funny you follow me where i go at the forum

I go to threads that look like they are stupid and then post about how stupid the thread is.

I am not following you- your threads just are all asinine.
Ok, so you have30,967 messages at this forum and you go to just the one that are stupid ? you want me stuck in a corner you and your Democratic friends, you will not got there.
 
Last edited:
It's hell in Syria,Obama is not a good commander in chef, he has the last word...you don't do war that way and when we think that we will may be stuck with Hillary for another 4 years.........disaster

What way would you be doing war in the Syria if you were the Commander in Chief?

I am just curious.

I will answer you with my French speaking ... we must repair the mistakes of the Iraq war when war is begun it must be hold.
Now we see all the bombing in Syria where Obama still wrongly it was not firm enough against Assad in 2013 he should not let him power against his people ( gaz ) also say that Assad is friends with Putin and who will now protect the Syrian people?
Well put some ground troops in Syria at least for ordinate and monitor keystrokes for the attack logistic less error would be committed fewer innocents would die.
Isis must be attack with full force a surprise attack if possible must get to the point anyway Isis must be destroyed before they cause even more deaths over, if the commander in chief takes his time over it will be a difficult thing to overcome isis.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top