Donald Praise Duterte War on Drugs?

[Andylusion]

Getting drunk is not an issue. Actually I would argue that the bible doesn't prohibit getting drunk either. Just not getting drunk all the time. The marriage in canae is definitely full with drunk people. Your bible translator would bowdlerize it of course. However, the party leader did say, "After the people are drunk". It suggest, as can be corroborated by pretty much any historians, that typical wedding parties at that time consist of drunk people.

Really. People live with usual genocide, crucifixion, no video game, and very low life expectancy. I would be surprised if Yahweh or any god in any culture would actually prohibit getting drunk. It's like a minor problem compared to the sort of problem people at that time face.

I repeat. Getting drunk is not an issue. Harming others while getting drunk is the issue. And there are TONS of people that drink wine and get drunk occasionally without harming others.

The fact that some people get drunk and beat up their wife is another issue. You don't prohibit porn to stop rape. You don't prohibit gun to stop murder. Fuck. You don't even blame blasphemy for terrorism. You just kill terrorists. The attack on US embassy in Libya is a very coordinated attack to seize weapon made possible by shillary leaking information to terrorist group.

Why prohibit alcohol to stop people beating up each other? There are tons of rich smart responsible alcohol drinker that don't beat each other up. If someone beat up their wife because of alcohol then a judge can penalize him from not drinking alcohol again in addition to jail time. There are criminals that do fucking real harm. Why aim for those who are relatively fine.

Even Jesus manufactures alcohol. What? You want him shot death by vigilantes too for manufacturing narcotic far more dangerous than weed?

And you still don't answer my question. What makes you think free market won't take care of it?

I am sick and tired seeing commies advocating centralized economy. If you allow government to prohibit drugs, what else would government promote and prohibit? Public schools with government curriculum? Not having health insurance? Mandatory health care? Being jewish? Practicing christianity?

Yes you would argue that practicing christianity is NOT dangerous just like I would argue that ganja, xtc, acid, and alcohol is NOT too dangerous. Well guess what? So what? Everything is true or false according to somebody. Humans are subjective. What matters is not whether something is true or not. What matter is who should decide what's good or bad.

Individuals? or some government officials?

If you want to be a christian, whose right should it be? Yours, or some government officials? The same way, if you want to do weed, whose right should it be? Yours? or some government officials?

What right do any government officials have in deciding, oh this substance is dangerous and this one is not? If they can do that with substance, what would stop them from deciding what religions is "safe" and stuff?

Communism and facism goes hand in hand. Somehow some supposedly trustworthy uhuk uhuk politicians know and decide what's best of us. It's as if you're asking for a benevolent dictator. No. All you will have is a dictator that line it's pocket and suck your blood and freedom.

Yes the wedding parties had some drunk people. I'm confused as to what point you think you are making. The Bible has many stories in it of what happened. Just because it happened, doesn't mean it was good, or that Jesus approved of it.

The Bible is real. It's not a fictional tale of how everyone should be in the magic perfect world.

I have some stories of things I did, that were bad, and should not be done. If I wrote a book about it, that wouldn't mean I advocate doing dumb things.

Again, I posted hundreds of examples where people intoxicated were doing real harm.

We spend hundreds of billions dealing with people who are intoxicated, doing real harm.

You keep saying that it's not a big deal, but the facts and dollar amounts are very big deals.

The facts are not on your side. Period. You are wrong.

 

[grbb]

Jesus approved it? Hell yea he did. He made half a tone more wine. If that's not approval nothing is. Did Yahweh approve alcohol? He asked for it. Beer in the Bible?

There are weeds in the bible too. In fact one of the ingredient of holy annoininting oil, kaneh bosem, is weed. Caneh bosem. Caneh boshe. Canna bis. Got it?

Let try to understand.

Because something MAY cause harms it should be prohibited?

Is that what you're saying? Because if that's your reasoning then anything can be prohibited by government. Because anything can cause harm.

I am saying you need to show more reason than simply it MAY cause harm.

Actually what things in the world may not cause harms. Cars, guns, computers, mouse, technology. All those may cause harm. So why don't we prohibit all those? Because it would be stupid.

Gun don't kill people. People kill people. Rather than abolishing guns society decides to simply kill murderers. Makes more sense.

Weed and alcohol don't make people beat up their wives. Wive beaters beat up their wives. Just put them to jail or revoke their right to use weed.



And you're still not answering my main question. Why not let the awesome super fair super just totally working MARKET MECHANISM to deal with EVERYTHING?

Now I know that some people may get drunk and live on welfare hurting everybody. Well guess what. That's the problem with welfare program. Not alcohol. If we just let them starve to death like any libertarian would suggest we wouldn't have that problem.

Or government can just give every voters equal amount of money and let people do what they want with it. Some will use it as capital to create the next microsoft. Some will use it to get drunk. Guess who gonna be richer? Let the market decide.

Let the market decide. Laissez-faire. Does those phrases mean anything to you? It works again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again in virtually all area of trades.

And somehow drugs and sex requires "special" rule.

Is weed good or bad for customer? Let the market decide. What about if the customer is hurting others? Well, don't we have laws against people beating up wives? We even have market mechanism that punish people for not being able to have a job. It's called less salary you know.

Let through market mechanism a programmer or a ceo will make hundreds of time a minimum wage worker. Minimum wage alone is socialism that cause far more harm than alcohol. Lack of IQ is a far bigger impediment to productivity than drinking alcohol or using weed. Why not prohibit that?

am not a millionaire yet and I accept that as just because I am not productive enough yet. I don't blame availability of weed, or alcohol or anything. I just say no to all of them. Hell, even if somebody say yes I honestly don't think anyone can't be a millionaire just because he smoke some weed.

 

[Andylusion]

Jesus approved it? Hell yea he did. He made half a tone more wine. If that's not approval nothing is. Did Yahweh approve alcohol? He asked for it. Beer in the Bible?

There are weeds in the bible too. In fact one of the ingredient of holy annoininting oil, kaneh bosem, is weed. Caneh bosem. Caneh boshe. Canna bis. Got it?

Let try to understand.

Because something MAY cause harms it should be prohibited?

Is that what you're saying? Because if that's your reasoning then anything can be prohibited by government. Because anything can cause harm.

I am saying you need to show more reason than simply it MAY cause harm.

Actually what things in the world may not cause harms. Cars, guns, computers, mouse, technology. All those may cause harm. So why don't we prohibit all those? Because it would be stupid.

Gun don't kill people. People kill people. Rather than abolishing guns society decides to simply kill murderers. Makes more sense.

Weed and alcohol don't make people beat up their wives. Wive beaters beat up their wives. Just put them to jail or revoke their right to use weed.



And you're still not answering my main question. Why not let the awesome super fair super just totally working MARKET MECHANISM to deal with EVERYTHING?

Now I know that some people may get drunk and live on welfare hurting everybody. Well guess what. That's the problem with welfare program. Not alcohol. If we just let them starve to death like any libertarian would suggest we wouldn't have that problem.

Or government can just give every voters equal amount of money and let people do what they want with it. Some will use it as capital to create the next microsoft. Some will use it to get drunk. Guess who gonna be richer? Let the market decide.

Let the market decide. Laissez-faire. Does those phrases mean anything to you? It works again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again in virtually all area of trades.

And somehow drugs and sex requires "special" rule.

Is weed good or bad for customer? Let the market decide. What about if the customer is hurting others? Well, don't we have laws against people beating up wives? We even have market mechanism that punish people for not being able to have a job. It's called less salary you know.

Let through market mechanism a programmer or a ceo will make hundreds of time a minimum wage worker. Minimum wage alone is socialism that cause far more harm than alcohol. Lack of IQ is a far bigger impediment to productivity than drinking alcohol or using weed. Why not prohibit that?

am not a millionaire yet and I accept that as just because I am not productive enough yet. I don't blame availability of weed, or alcohol or anything. I just say no to all of them. Hell, even if somebody say yes I honestly don't think anyone can't be a millionaire just because he smoke some weed.

No it's not approving it! No, I can make wine myself. It's actually not all that difficult. You can buy kits to do it. I could make thousands of gallons of wine.

That does not by any stretch mean, that I approve of people getting drunk and intoxicated.

Look... this is getting tiresome because you are arguing at the level of a five year old.

I've made my points, and you have done your best to make your points. Obviously you think drugs are great and don't harm anyone. I think drugs harm tons of people because working in care centers, I see them all the time, and meet people whose lives have been destroyed, families ruined, and people damaged. I, being a person who sees the real life results of your belief system, simply know better than you do.

I'm never going to see it your way. And obviously you are too high, and stoned to see it any other way.

It's been great, but this is old now. And especially you trying to tell me Jesus was some pro-alcoholic.... seriously, you lost the entire argument when you went down that path. A thousand verses against being intoxicated, and you find one verse, and fabricate that it means Jesus was in favor of being wasted.

Next time, try and be more adult in the debate. As for me, we're done here. I'll move on. You can argue with someone else. Have a good one, and you better hope no politician stands up to say he'll clean the streets of criminals, like druggies. Because people like me, will vote for them, and there's a ton of us.

 

[grbb]

Drugs can be dangerous and what?

You want something prohibited just because life is destroyed?

You prefer that than letting government decide?

Show me one verse in the bible that says you shall not drink alcohol. Actually show me one verse that says you shall not have sex outside marriage? Christians are ridiculous. It's as if they have their own mind and they want to convince us that it's God's will.

They don't even bother letting the market decide anymore. No. They think it's bad. Government have to micromanage which drug should be prohibited or not based on very unclear rules that the public do not even know.

THEY THINK something should be prohibited and that's it. They just say it's dangerous, as anything is dangerous in some way, and poof, it should be illegal because THEY THINK it should.

Fortunately most voters have common sense and more and more states in US legalize weed. Soon the whole world will be.

Drinking in different parts of the world (I had to upgrade this)

 

[charwin95]

So you support civil war just like other members here waiting for race war. Not only that you are a lunatic but a moron. Sorry decent Americans is not going to let that happen here in this country.

What is going on in the Philippines is not a civil war ............. but it's called extrajudicial killings by so called vigilantes and policemen.

Let me repeat it again. No one in the right mind support criminals they should be all killed including drug user/dealer and pushers.
1. Killing without any proof or justification is a criminal in itself.
2. Can you guarantee me that these so called vigilantes and policemen are only killing drug user, pusher and criminals? If so prove it.
3. Letting the Civilians do the killings are uncivilized and unconstitutional.
Several Filipino businessmen owe me money. Now they can just shoot me then claim I'm a drug dealer so they can easily eliminate their debt. Do YOU eeeeeven understand what I'm talking about? Duterte didn't make feel safe but he made me makes me very nervous visiting Philippines. You tried to claim that you know Davao and Philippines which you don't know nothing about.
4. Mexican vigilantes are only fighting drug cartels which is very limited only to a certain territory. But these Mexican vigilantes are not going around killing people like in the Philippines.
5. Bangladesh..... There are no vigilantes and LEO going around killing people like in the Philippines.

Most or all of your comparison are totally out of wack and dishonest just to prove your justification of killing people wether they are innocent or not.

You are defective human being.

lol.... Says a guy whose defending the criminals and evil people of our society, while I defend the law abiding people.

You are a defective human being.

No, I don't want a civil war, or any war. What I want is people to obey the law.

You do that, we won't have a problem.

You.... *YOU*... want to violate the law, and have nothing bad happen. Well..... "Sorry decent Americans is not going to let that happen here in this country."


1. You haven't proved that there was no evidence or proof. Only that you haven't seen that evidence or proof.

2. No, I don't live there, and neither do you so. I not only do I not have to prove my case, but I don't care what you think either.

Again, the BBC interviewed dozens of people, and they.... the people of that country, supported it. *AND* all the people shot that the BBC investigated during their report.... were in fact drug dealers and users.

3. What you call "Uncivilized" is what was the norm for 4,000 to 6,000 years of human history. What you call "civilized", is today where people get away with crime, and the victims are blamed for leaving their wallet in their car. Where people commit multiple murders, and are left living, eating, and spending the tax payers money, of the victims, for literally 30 years.

The uncivilized system was far more fair and just, than our civilized system.

4. Yes they are. Granted you are right, it's only happening in the areas where the governmental law enforcement has completely failed. However, that is exactly why it's happening across the entire country in the Philippines. If the justice system was failing cross the entire country of Mexico, like it did in the Philippines, then you would see vigilantes across all of Mexico too.

5. Bangladesh, because they don't need to. Their vigilante system is so ingrained into society, that people don't dare screw up. When you have a system of law enforcement that is completely thorough... then you don't need to start killing people, because you don't have a massive crime problem.

Again, Singapore has had many years with zero hangings, even though they have the death penalty for just taking of drugs, let alone murder, kidnapping, and a few others. Why? Because there have been many years they had ZERO drug offenses. And why do they have ZERO drug offenses in a city of five and a half million, that is right next to the drug-triangle of Asia? Because they KILL YOUR BUTT.

Shockingly, if you have a tough law, and you enforce that tough law..... people obey the law.... then you don't need death squads, and vigilantes, and all this other nonsense.

I would love to not need vigilantes. I would love to not need death squads. I would love to not need video cameras across the country, or the NSA search through every online message and phone txt. Unfortunately we don't enforce the law. Unfortunately you people keep breaking the law... or supporting those who break the law.

So thus, we need all this. That doesn't make me a bad person. I don't want any of this. That makes YOU the bad person. YOU make all this necessary.

You are the one with the issue of being an evil person. Not me. I'm the good guy that stands up for the law abiding citizens. You are the one defending the criminals. Not me.

You are a liar.......... You are putting words in my mouth. I am not a defender of criminals and I support death penalty and tough on criminals like Singapore. But I do not support PAID vigilantes and cops roaming around killing people without any clear proof of evidence. That is what I stand for over and over. Moron.
Again Singapore or Bangladesh have very tough sentences BUT they don't go around killing people. That's a big difference what is going in the Philippines. Moron.

You are not a defender of law abiding citizen you are a supporter of criminals. Loud and Clear.
You want to kill people not me...... you do not represent a good guy. You are NOT a good person. YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.

I don't live in the Philippines but I have business for over 20 years and I speak 2 local dialects Tagalog and Ilocano also Chinese Mandarin and Vietnamese but im not yet fluent in Japanese. I traveled to Asian countries for many many times but I slowed down when I made my son a CEO. Last time I was in the Phil. was Feb. 2016. So I know a lot about Asian countries.
Yes you do care what I think otherwise you will not be responding that long. If I were you I would not be saying that. Moron.
Again BBC interviews of Filipinos in front of camera........... give me a fucking break even the Supreme Court are afraid of him. Even if you resist arrest or owed money they will kill you. See link as an example of lawlessness. Stupid.

Philippines drugs war: The woman who kills dealers for a living - BBC News

So even your own link, clearly says "dealers".

You post this as something you are against. Yes or no?

So what does that make you? A supporter of criminals.

End of story. You can bicker and whine, and cry, and scream that you are not supporting criminals, but every link you have posted thus far, says otherwise.

You are not posting links of the random killing of law abiding citizens. You are posting links where criminals are killed.

Period. YOUR LINK, PROVES *MY* POINT.

That's all there is to it. You can keep posting a hundred more links, and scream and yell until the end of time.

You support criminals. PERIOD. YOU. Not me. I support the law abiding citizens of that country, putting an end to criminals.

You either support the citizens, like I do... or you support the criminals, as your post suggests. You can keep posting more and more links, that prove I'm right, and good, and you are wrong and evil all you want.

You just keep digging yourself into a deep pit of supporting evil and injustice, which only proves YOU are evil and unjust.

What in the world are you talking about Dude? You support killing people without any proof of evidence even if the victims are NOT drug dealers or users YOU are a criminal letting these criminal fake vigilantes going around killing people.

You are putting words in my mouth. You are a dishonest defective human being. Pathetic liar. No one in the right mind support criminals.

No I'm not digging myself into pit ................. I'm just trying to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
There are no links or proof that law abiding citizens going around killing people. You are dumber than I thought.

Well you have the right to be wrong. Keep posting links that prove my point, and prove you support the criminals.

Again, you can spew your insults, while proving I'm right.
Claim you don't support criminals, while proving I'm right.
And scream about how bad and terrible I am, while proving I'm right.

Just keep going dude. Feel free to keep making my point. Works for me.

You are totally wrong Dude........... . Read my posts from the beginning. I MADE IT VERY CLEAR. I don't have problems killing drug users and dealers on the spot ................. only if you have proof of evidence not just willy randomly going around killing people by fake vigilantes.
Some of the killings by crooked police are also in questions let alone people going around killing people

I also posted here............ that you don't hear killing rapists, murderers, child molesters, burglars, watch/purse grabber, holdups etc. etc. etc. but only drug bullshit related. You don't even hear marijuana plantations own by the negritoes by the sierras being raided or uprooted.

Since you don't have any clue and lack of knowledge or credibility what is really going on over there you are proving that YOU ARE IGNORANT.
Most common theft are the cell phones grabbers especially iPhones.............. Did you hear anyone getting shot or killed from stealing cellphones? HECK NO.................. I don't have problems shooting these thugs on the spot.

 

[charwin95]

This is just one good example how crazy this guy is. Yesterday he also threatened to declare martial law because he knows they are going after him.




http://beta.philstar.com/headlines/...ers-troops-blast-militants-and-their-hostages

MANILA, Philippines — President Rodrigo Duterte said he has ordered his troops to bomb extremists who flee with their captives in a bid to stop a wave of kidnappings at sea, calling the loss of civilian lives in such an attack "collateral damage."
Duterte has previously stated that he had told his Indonesian and Malaysian counterparts their forces can blast away as they pursue militants who abduct sailors in waters where the three countries converge and bring their kidnap victims to Mindanao. He said in a speech late Saturday that he had given the same orders to Filipino forces.

 

[grbb]

That one is not crazy. If people pay ransom they kidnap again. So they choose to blow them up. I wonder if civilians in Philiphines can have gun to defend themselves.

 

[charwin95]

That one is not crazy. If people pay ransom they kidnap again. So they choose to blow them up. I wonder if civilians in Philiphines can have gun to defend themselves.

So an innocent citizen just like you casually walking suddenly get kidnap then get killed. If that is you and your family....... Is that acceptable?
Why not go after the kidnappers and kill them all? Why kill the innocents? Yes Filipinos are allowed to buy guns.
If you read the link some of the victims are from neighboring countries.

 

[grbb]

Because killing only the asshole is difficult and it would risk death innocent swat team. Also, knowing it's difficult will encourage people to pay ransome that will encourage more kidnapping.

This is why I am not a full libertarian. People are RESPONSIBLE to protect themselves. Government do protect us but it has reasonable terms.

If you drink antibiotic some innocent cells will die too. So what? You drink it anyway.

If Duterte bomb abu shayaf, people will see the determination. Even if the hostage are death I would still kill you anyway. Kidnapping only leads to death. If the victim family understand, and got some compensation, I think the victim family will try to murder abu shayaf even more. More people hate abu shayaf and they're death.

Politic is a bit complex. You can't just use one simple principle for all problem (like pretty much any ideology).

Sometimes you just have to play hardball against those who play hardball. Abu shayaf are thugs. Unlike small time thugs that can be carefully rooted out with no damage, they're big too so. So government got to take off gloves.

I'd say killing hostage is far more acceptable than killing civilians in Lebanon. We asians are doing this better than the rest of the world.

 

[charwin95]

Because killing only the asshole is difficult and it would risk death innocent swat team. Also, knowing it's difficult will encourage people to pay ransome that will encourage more kidnapping.

This is why I am not a full libertarian. People are RESPONSIBLE to protect themselves. Government do protect us but it has reasonable terms.

If you drink antibiotic some innocent cells will die too. So what? You drink it anyway.

If Duterte bomb abu shayaf, people will see the determination. Even if the hostage are death I would still kill you anyway. Kidnapping only leads to death. If the victim family understand, and got some compensation, I think the victim family will try to murder abu shayaf even more. More people hate abu shayaf and they're death.

Politic is a bit complex. You can't just use one simple principle for all problem (like pretty much any ideology).

Sometimes you just have to play hardball against those who play hardball. Abu shayaf are thugs. Unlike small time thugs that can be carefully rooted out with no damage, they're big too so. So government got to take off gloves.

I'd say killing hostage is far more acceptable than killing civilians in Lebanon. We asians are doing this better than the rest of the world.

This is like saying go ahead kill them I don't care.
If those are my love ones...... I will do anything to save them including my life. Money is just a material life is irreplaceable. Aside from that I don't care the rest.

Abu shayaf and the MNLF is a lot tougher than everyone thought in that tiny island. As far as I know they been fighting since the 70s with the help US special operations in last 2 years. Maybe nuke them......... but that will kill a lot of civilians. ...

 

[grbb]

I would do anything I can do not to get kidnapped in the first place. If I got kidnapped, all I would ask Duterte is that he kill 100k abu shayaf to avenge me.

If one of my son is death I would just make another one. Life is short. True eternal life is having children.

 

[charwin95]

I would do anything I can do not to get kidnapped in the first place. If I got kidnapped, all I would ask Duterte is that he kill 100k abu shayaf to avenge me.

If one of my son is death I would just make another one. Life is short. True eternal life is having children.

Agree 100% just like this couple an American and Canadian that was kidnap in Afghanistan. See link. Not sure why these people need to venture in these areas when they know it's very dangerous.
Like this dude from here southern California name Sobero went to one these southern islands with his mistress got kidnap in 2001 then beheaded. I remember this very well because I was in the Beijing when my wife called me about this news. She got so scared about Phil. that she doesn't want me complete my itineraries so to calm her down I traveled back here.
Also like one of my golf buddies him and his wife went to Istanbul, Turkey last September and they also did some hiking. I warned them but thanks god they came home safely.

BUT If you live in those areas where you earn for a living .......... you don't have much choice. Even here in America kidnaping or child abductions is very common even if you are trying to be safe.
As far as killing abusayaf...... see my previous post. I have not travel to that most southern part of the Phillipines but I know that it's a combinations of several beautiful tiny islands. Looking at it from aerial photo.......... it looks very simple to me........... How difficult can that be to kill all these thugs?
I traveled to the other countries south of Phil. like Brunei, east Borneo and Indonesia and its a little calm compare to Mindanao, Phil.

American woman and family held hostage in Afghanistan for four years begs Barack Obama and Donald Trump for help

 

[charwin95]

Because killing only the asshole is difficult and it would risk death innocent swat team. Also, knowing it's difficult will encourage people to pay ransome that will encourage more kidnapping.

This is why I am not a full libertarian. People are RESPONSIBLE to protect themselves. Government do protect us but it has reasonable terms.

If you drink antibiotic some innocent cells will die too. So what? You drink it anyway.

If Duterte bomb abu shayaf, people will see the determination. Even if the hostage are death I would still kill you anyway. Kidnapping only leads to death. If the victim family understand, and got some compensation, I think the victim family will try to murder abu shayaf even more. More people hate abu shayaf and they're death.

Politic is a bit complex. You can't just use one simple principle for all problem (like pretty much any ideology).

Sometimes you just have to play hardball against those who play hardball. Abu shayaf are thugs. Unlike small time thugs that can be carefully rooted out with no damage, they're big too so. So government got to take off gloves.

I'd say killing hostage is far more acceptable than killing civilians in Lebanon. We asians are doing this better than the rest of the world.

I was at my best friend's house last Wednesday night 1/18 when I quoted (#250) your post but he was sick of pneumonia so I spent a lot of time in this site. He live about 73 miles west from me. That same night I was very busy battling 3 racists & traitors in a separate thread ( Trump Is An Illegitimate President And Always Be ). That is why I missed your last sentence of your post that you are an Asian.
Unfortunately I'm not Asian but my best friend is a Filipino. My parents arrived here in early 30s from Europe.
Actually I didn't know him at all nor I met him but I was in unpredictable unavoidable life and death situation he came up out from nowhere as a Good Samaritan and saved my life. We thought he will not make it................. miraculously he survived but with permanent physical damage that ended his engineering career and sex life. I covered all his expenses that's not covered by his insurance and also lost income. I offered and insisted him more financial help but refused to go any further than that. He said he did that willingly on his own and he will do it again.
Fast forward he recovered very well .................. Then less than 2 years ago suffered severe depression. Loosing weights, blocked everyone etc etc etc etc. Tried to commit suicide, put him on 24 hours suicide watch for awhile and that's when I stepped in. I literally live in his house in last 18 months and sometimes moved him into my house. I dedicated a lot of time with him trying to save his life as a payback. Took him to a lot of places including trips such as cruises, ball games, casinos but doesn't gamble just sat next to me and have fun, fishings, concerts, different shows etc etc etc. Wala.......... Starts smiling, laughing, gained normal weights etc etc etc and now living in normal life. I Scaled down my contact with him in last 3 months.
Still refused any financial help. He is doing very well drive luxury cars, 4 bedrooms, with 3 car garage, paid off only him and his wife, all kids are grown ups and all live successfully.
I found other ways to help him by bringing his 3 older brothers here to US legally of course. Helped put a house down payment to his only son that don't own a house but he warned me stop from there. He also became my closest confidants that handle my secret accounts.
Anyway......... just want to share you my best moments with Asian.

 

[grbb]

Because killing only the asshole is difficult and it would risk death innocent swat team. Also, knowing it's difficult will encourage people to pay ransome that will encourage more kidnapping.

This is why I am not a full libertarian. People are RESPONSIBLE to protect themselves. Government do protect us but it has reasonable terms.

If you drink antibiotic some innocent cells will die too. So what? You drink it anyway.

If Duterte bomb abu shayaf, people will see the determination. Even if the hostage are death I would still kill you anyway. Kidnapping only leads to death. If the victim family understand, and got some compensation, I think the victim family will try to murder abu shayaf even more. More people hate abu shayaf and they're death.

Politic is a bit complex. You can't just use one simple principle for all problem (like pretty much any ideology).

Sometimes you just have to play hardball against those who play hardball. Abu shayaf are thugs. Unlike small time thugs that can be carefully rooted out with no damage, they're big too so. So government got to take off gloves.

I'd say killing hostage is far more acceptable than killing civilians in Lebanon. We asians are doing this better than the rest of the world.

I was at my best friend's house last Wednesday night 1/18 when I quoted (#250) your post but he was sick of pneumonia so I spent a lot of time in this site. He live about 73 miles west from me. That same night I was very busy battling 3 racists & traitors in a separate thread ( Trump Is An Illegitimate President And Always Be ). That is why I missed your last sentence of your post that you are an Asian.
Unfortunately I'm not Asian but my best friend is a Filipino. My parents arrived here in early 30s from Europe.
Actually I didn't know him at all nor I met him but I was in unpredictable unavoidable life and death situation he came up out from nowhere as a Good Samaritan and saved my life. We thought he will not make it................. miraculously he survived but with permanent physical damage that ended his engineering career and sex life. I covered all his expenses that's not covered by his insurance and also lost income. I offered and insisted him more financial help but refused to go any further than that. He said he did that willingly on his own and he will do it again.
Fast forward he recovered very well .................. Then less than 2 years ago suffered severe depression. Loosing weights, blocked everyone etc etc etc etc. Tried to commit suicide, put him on 24 hours suicide watch for awhile and that's when I stepped in. I literally live in his house in last 18 months and sometimes moved him into my house. I dedicated a lot of time with him trying to save his life as a payback. Took him to a lot of places including trips such as cruises, ball games, casinos but doesn't gamble just sat next to me and have fun, fishings, concerts, different shows etc etc etc. Wala.......... Starts smiling, laughing, gained normal weights etc etc etc and now living in normal life. I Scaled down my contact with him in last 3 months.
Still refused any financial help. He is doing very well drive luxury cars, 4 bedrooms, with 3 car garage, paid off only him and his wife, all kids are grown ups and all live successfully.
I found other ways to help him by bringing his 3 older brothers here to US legally of course. Helped put a house down payment to his only son that don't own a house but he warned me stop from there. He also became my closest confidants that handle my secret accounts.
Anyway......... just want to share you my best moments with Asian.

I too have great relationship with a few white guys and jews. Fellow chinese tend to eat me.

We have our differences. I just think that some laws are so stupid that the whole government will justly lost legitimacy in enacting it.

I do not care if weed causes people death. It doesn't. But as long as people are fully aware of what they eat and no critical information is withhold I do not see how that's in anyway non cosensual.

Here is another stupid law Wyoming bill would all but outlaw clean energy, by forbidding utilities from using it

I bet andy will come here and say well solar energy is illegal. That means it's dangerous. I have seen so many people in rehabilitation because of using solar energy.

He can't see that so many laws are just plain, corrupt. That it's simply made as robbery from one guy to another.

 

[grbb]

Because killing only the asshole is difficult and it would risk death innocent swat team. Also, knowing it's difficult will encourage people to pay ransome that will encourage more kidnapping.

This is why I am not a full libertarian. People are RESPONSIBLE to protect themselves. Government do protect us but it has reasonable terms.

If you drink antibiotic some innocent cells will die too. So what? You drink it anyway.

If Duterte bomb abu shayaf, people will see the determination. Even if the hostage are death I would still kill you anyway. Kidnapping only leads to death. If the victim family understand, and got some compensation, I think the victim family will try to murder abu shayaf even more. More people hate abu shayaf and they're death.

Politic is a bit complex. You can't just use one simple principle for all problem (like pretty much any ideology).

Sometimes you just have to play hardball against those who play hardball. Abu shayaf are thugs. Unlike small time thugs that can be carefully rooted out with no damage, they're big too so. So government got to take off gloves.

I'd say killing hostage is far more acceptable than killing civilians in Lebanon. We asians are doing this better than the rest of the world.

I was at my best friend's house last Wednesday night 1/18 when I quoted (#250) your post but he was sick of pneumonia so I spent a lot of time in this site. He live about 73 miles west from me. That same night I was very busy battling 3 racists & traitors in a separate thread ( Trump Is An Illegitimate President And Always Be ). That is why I missed your last sentence of your post that you are an Asian.
Unfortunately I'm not Asian but my best friend is a Filipino. My parents arrived here in early 30s from Europe.
Actually I didn't know him at all nor I met him but I was in unpredictable unavoidable life and death situation he came up out from nowhere as a Good Samaritan and saved my life. We thought he will not make it................. miraculously he survived but with permanent physical damage that ended his engineering career and sex life. I covered all his expenses that's not covered by his insurance and also lost income. I offered and insisted him more financial help but refused to go any further than that. He said he did that willingly on his own and he will do it again.
Fast forward he recovered very well .................. Then less than 2 years ago suffered severe depression. Loosing weights, blocked everyone etc etc etc etc. Tried to commit suicide, put him on 24 hours suicide watch for awhile and that's when I stepped in. I literally live in his house in last 18 months and sometimes moved him into my house. I dedicated a lot of time with him trying to save his life as a payback. Took him to a lot of places including trips such as cruises, ball games, casinos but doesn't gamble just sat next to me and have fun, fishings, concerts, different shows etc etc etc. Wala.......... Starts smiling, laughing, gained normal weights etc etc etc and now living in normal life. I Scaled down my contact with him in last 3 months.
Still refused any financial help. He is doing very well drive luxury cars, 4 bedrooms, with 3 car garage, paid off only him and his wife, all kids are grown ups and all live successfully.
I found other ways to help him by bringing his 3 older brothers here to US legally of course. Helped put a house down payment to his only son that don't own a house but he warned me stop from there. He also became my closest confidants that handle my secret accounts.
Anyway......... just want to share you my best moments with Asian.

I too have great relationship with a few white guys and jews. Fellow chinese tend to eat me.

We have our differences. I just think that some laws are so stupid that the whole government will justly lost legitimacy in enacting it.

I do not care if weed causes people death. It doesn't. But as long as people are fully aware of what they eat and no critical information is withhold I do not see how that's in anyway non cosensual.

Here is another stupid law Wyoming bill would all but outlaw clean energy, by forbidding utilities from using it

I bet andy will come here and say well solar energy is illegal. That means it's dangerous. I have seen so many people in rehabilitation because of using solar energy.

He can't see that so many laws are just plain, corrupt. That it's simply made as robbery from one guy to another.

 

[grbb]

Here I am ready to kill more criminals

Most of us live in illegality.

 

[grbb]

Let's murder this drug user
Who knows where this is from?

 

[grbb]

You know what about if drugs are useful for smart people and dangerous for dumb people. Should it be legal?

For example.

Smart people knows what drugs are dangerous. Smart programmers use microdose LSD to improve their productivity.

Dumb people Andy saw are probably dumb to begin with. There is no scientific study that shows that extacy, ganja, or lsd lower IQ.