Domination

[PoliticalChic]

Now do you see why he is the NYLiar?

You really did say that. You're the only liar here.

No, actually I didn't.

Or...you would have quoted same.

But, you are stupid enough to agree with the NYLiar.

You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution.

Put in the quote, NYLiar.
We'll start there.

"As the abattoir known as the French Revolution proved, replacing religion with reason is a monumental error.
'Reason' results in deciding to kill any who don't agree with the government."

yes we'll start there.

Now you tell me what exactly in that quote makes my quote a lie.

My quote is:

"You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution."



Be specific

Now....watch carefully and note how a scholar destroys you:

1. Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason: “We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will. Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

Disagree....and the consequence is death. Such is the view of every totalitarian regime.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, actually I didn't.

Or...you would have quoted same.

But, you are stupid enough to agree with the NYLiar.

You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution.

Put in the quote, NYLiar.
We'll start there.

You're denying outright that you ever blamed reason for the bloodiness of the French Revolution?

Deny it, or let it stand as fact.

Are you now claiming you cannot provide the actual quote?

I have. #256. You can now run away.

Are you now claiming you cannot provide the actual quote?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't stop now, NYLiar.....please, continue....I have more to add!

 

[deltex1]

No I'm not. Separation of chuch and state.

Why would you have separation of church and state if you believe God's law is not only necessary but supreme?

Why do some Christian churches consider abortion permissible? Why do some Christian churches accept and endorse same sex marriage?

Is God telling some churches one thing and some another?

How can our morality come from God and only God if no one can say for certain what IS God's morality?

The word of God is interpreted by man, debated by man, expanded by man. Man wants to negotiate an easier path to salvation. The closer we stay to the Ten Commandments the better off we will be. You got a problem wid dat?

Explain the Second Commandment.

EXODUS 20:4
4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

Figure out who the One God is. Follow Him and Him only. Do not worship false idols...such as Lady Gaga or Obabble. If you do that you'll be saved. If you don't you'll be fugged. If it's all a myth...you'll never know it...you'll be fuggin dead.

Which God believes same sex marriage is a sin? And prove whichever one you pick exists.

The God of Sodom and Gomorrah. Can't prove it to a disbeliever. Believing is having faith that it's true. Better to live with faith than to die with none...to have lived for nothing.

 

[deltex1]

1. 
   "Furthermore, the conflation of terms such as atheist, agnostic, non-religious and non-theist add to confusion among poll data. A 2002 survey by Adherents.com, estimates that the proportion of the world's people who are "secular, non-religious, agnostics and atheists" at about 14%."

You are out voted and out believed.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You really did say that. You're the only liar here.

No, actually I didn't.

Or...you would have quoted same.

But, you are stupid enough to agree with the NYLiar.

You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution.

Put in the quote, NYLiar.
We'll start there.

"As the abattoir known as the French Revolution proved, replacing religion with reason is a monumental error.
'Reason' results in deciding to kill any who don't agree with the government."

yes we'll start there.

Now you tell me what exactly in that quote makes my quote a lie.

My quote is:

"You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution."



Be specific

Now....watch carefully and note how a scholar destroys you:

1. Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason: “We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will. Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

Disagree....and the consequence is death. Such is the view of every totalitarian regime.

Once again, I don't debate dead people.

I quoted your statement verbatim. Either defend it in your own words or we can add your capitulation to the rest of your humorous act.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why would you have separation of church and state if you believe God's law is not only necessary but supreme?

Why do some Christian churches consider abortion permissible? Why do some Christian churches accept and endorse same sex marriage?

Is God telling some churches one thing and some another?

How can our morality come from God and only God if no one can say for certain what IS God's morality?

The word of God is interpreted by man, debated by man, expanded by man. Man wants to negotiate an easier path to salvation. The closer we stay to the Ten Commandments the better off we will be. You got a problem wid dat?

Explain the Second Commandment.

EXODUS 20:4
4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

Figure out who the One God is. Follow Him and Him only. Do not worship false idols...such as Lady Gaga or Obabble. If you do that you'll be saved. If you don't you'll be fugged. If it's all a myth...you'll never know it...you'll be fuggin dead.

Which God believes same sex marriage is a sin? And prove whichever one you pick exists.

The God of Sodom and Gomorrah. Can't prove it to a disbeliever. Believing is having faith that it's true. Better to live with faith than to die with none...to have lived for nothing.

The God of Sodom etc. is a character in a storybook.

Prove that there is a real living entity called 'God' who opposes same sex marriage and will throw those who disagree into a fiery furnace of eternal damnation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, actually I didn't.

Or...you would have quoted same.

But, you are stupid enough to agree with the NYLiar.

You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution.

Put in the quote, NYLiar.
We'll start there.

"As the abattoir known as the French Revolution proved, replacing religion with reason is a monumental error.
'Reason' results in deciding to kill any who don't agree with the government."

yes we'll start there.

Now you tell me what exactly in that quote makes my quote a lie.

My quote is:

"You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution."



Be specific

Now....watch carefully and note how a scholar destroys you:

1. Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason: “We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will. Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

Disagree....and the consequence is death. Such is the view of every totalitarian regime.

Once again, I don't debate dead people.

I quoted your statement verbatim. Either defend it in your own words or we can add your capitulation to the rest of your humorous act.

No, actually I didn't.

Or...you would have quoted same.

But, you are stupid enough to agree with the NYLiar.

You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution.

Put in the quote, NYLiar.
We'll start there.

"As the abattoir known as the French Revolution proved, replacing religion with reason is a monumental error.
'Reason' results in deciding to kill any who don't agree with the government."

yes we'll start there.

Now you tell me what exactly in that quote makes my quote a lie.

My quote is:

"You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution."



Be specific

Now....watch carefully and note how a scholar destroys you:

1. Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason: “We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will. Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

Disagree....and the consequence is death. Such is the view of every totalitarian regime.

Once again, I don't debate dead people.

I quoted your statement verbatim. Either defend it in your own words or we can add your capitulation to the rest of your humorous act.

"You blamed 'reason' for the bloodiness of the French Revolution."

And I proved it.



This was another of your lies, wasn't it:
"She stated, unequivocally, that the ability of humans to reason is what's wrong with the human race."

 

[Jantje_Smit]

So, what do you define as "socialism"?

Everyone seems to have his own definition of socialism but the way I see it, it's an economic system without private ownership of natural resources and means of production (except labour) where the basic means of existence (healthcare, education, housing, basic income etc.) are provided by the government (one elected by the people for the benefit of the people, not the corporations). And no, that doesn't mean a communist dictatorship, run by someone like Stalin, maybe more like a kibbutz on a very large scale.

I don't know if you're a Star Trek fan but it would be something like the way society is organized in the those movies (like Earth that is, not the Ferengi)