DOJ OK’s Voter Fraud

You assume there was a case, the DOJ syas there is not.

Bush assholes on the DOJ did all sorts of false cases.

That was found in the investigation.

Assume ?

assume your ass....look at the video.....undeniable proof of voter intimidation and eye witness testimony....all ignored because of a bigot in the white house..
 
Dear asshole ,I have viewed teh tape numberous times and the guy is polite and intimidates no one, that is why teh case was dropped.

Hes an asshole for sure but in front of the polling station there is no proofc of intimidation to the unbiased eye.
 
Dear asshole ,I have viewed teh tape numberous times and the guy is polite and intimidates no one, that is why teh case was dropped.

Hes an asshole for sure but in front of the polling station there is no proofc of intimidation to the unbiased eye.

No...you're an asshole not him....he was doing what he was doing because hes a white hating, Black Panther, and not hiding it in the least...you do what you do because you're just a fucking stupid partisan democrat....
 
From the article which truth refuses to read:

Missouri has a long and documented history of voter fraud in Democratic-leaning cities such as St. Louis and Kansas City. Ms. Carnahan may now stand to benefit from voter fraud facilitated by the improperly kept voter rolls that she herself allowed to continue.

Who Will Investigate the Investigators? - WSJ.com

No one here should take the time to look up those "documented cases" because truth can't handle the truth. But she claims there was no fraud. :cuckoo:

Why do we bother????:confused:
 
The DOJ scandal will not disapear for your partisan hackery.

Bush and team BROKE the law and its in the records
 
Your fucking hero cowboy politized the DOJ, did you forget that one?

He hired cronies instead of good attorneys

You do realize you are libeling a bunch of attorneys, right? Am I the only one who thinks this is a really dumb idea?
 
Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You people keep trying to rewrite the history of Bush.

Fuck you , we will not let the truth be your victim anymore





Inspector General Report and Special Prosecutor
On September 29, 2008 the Justice Department's Inspector General (IG) released a report on the matter that found most of the firings were politically motivated and improper. The next day Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed a special prosecutor, Nora Dannehy, to decide whether criminal charges should be brought against Gonzales and other officials involved in the firings.[45] The IG's report contained "substantial evidence" that party politics drove a number of the firings, and IG Glenn Fine said in a statement that Gonzales had "abdicated his responsibility to safeguard the integrity and independence of the department."[161] The report itself stopped short of resolving questions about higher White House involvement in the matter, because of what it said were the refusal to cooperate of a number of key players, among them Karl Rove, Senator Pete Domenici and Harriet Miers and because the White House refused to hand over its documents related to the firings.[162]
 
The DOJ scandal will not disapear for your partisan hackery.

Bush and team BROKE the law and its in the records

There is nothing illegal about the President firing DOJ attorneys. Clinton fired 93 of them. They serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. Clinton was within his rights to fire them under him. Bush within his rights to fire them under his administration.

The difference? Clinton did it when he immediately got into office. Bush didn't do it until after he evaluated their preformance and they demonstrated to him that they weren't reliable.

Even so, nothing unethical or wrong about either of them.

Why is it you seem to think people are entitled to these positions?
 
The DOJ scandal will not disapear for your partisan hackery.

Bush and team BROKE the law and its in the records

There is nothing illegal about the President firing DOJ attorneys. Clinton fired 93 of them. They serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. Clinton was within his rights to fire them under him. Bush within his rights to fire them under his administration.

The difference? Clinton did it when he immediately got into office. Bush didn't do it until after he evaluated their preformance and they demonstrated to him that they weren't reliable.

Even so, nothing unethical or wrong about either of them.

Why is it you seem to think people are entitled to these positions?

And the investigations into the issue completely disagree with your partisan take.
 
The DOJ scandal will not disapear for your partisan hackery.

Bush and team BROKE the law and its in the records

There is nothing illegal about the President firing DOJ attorneys. Clinton fired 93 of them. They serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. Clinton was within his rights to fire them under him. Bush within his rights to fire them under his administration.

The difference? Clinton did it when he immediately got into office. Bush didn't do it until after he evaluated their preformance and they demonstrated to him that they weren't reliable.

Even so, nothing unethical or wrong about either of them.

Why is it you seem to think people are entitled to these positions?

And the investigations into the issue completely disagree with your partisan take.

What exactly is partisan in saying that both President Clinton and Bush have the absolute authority to hire and fire DOJ attorneys at will?

You need to let go of the lies and start holding to the truth TM. You are going to destroy yourself otherwise. And when you do that, those around you suffer too.
 
Last edited:
I hope white people wise up and get more creative than black people and defraud better n the black people. That's what wins elections. Voter Fraud. Go white Republicans we need you now more than ever. De fraud the hell out of em..:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
Dear asshole ,I have viewed teh tape numberous times and the guy is polite and intimidates no one, that is why teh case was dropped.

Hes an asshole for sure but in front of the polling station there is no proofc of intimidation to the unbiased eye.


QF Posterity's Sake.

This is just about the Epitome of an Ignorant TM Post.

The typos and misspellificationizingments are classic.
 
I hope white people wise up and get more creative than black people and defraud better n the black people. That's what wins elections. Voter Fraud. Go white Republicans we need you now more than ever. De fraud the hell out of em..:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

Better be careful. Some of the "intellectual" liberals around here might not recognize your sarcasm.
 
There is nothing illegal about the President firing DOJ attorneys. Clinton fired 93 of them. They serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. Clinton was within his rights to fire them under him. Bush within his rights to fire them under his administration.

The difference? Clinton did it when he immediately got into office. Bush didn't do it until after he evaluated their preformance and they demonstrated to him that they weren't reliable.

Even so, nothing unethical or wrong about either of them.

Why is it you seem to think people are entitled to these positions?

And the investigations into the issue completely disagree with your partisan take.

What exactly is partisan in saying that both President Clinton and Bush have the absolutely authority to hire and fire DOJ attorneys at will?

You need to let go of the lies and start holding to the truth TM. You are going to destroy yourself otherwise. And when you do that, those around you suffer too.

Well for one big one you are ignoiring the investigations into the issue and all its findings to repeat a Bush team LIE designed to protect the people who fucked this country big time.
 
Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You people keep trying to rewrite the history of Bush.

Fuck you , we will not let the truth be your victim anymore





Inspector General Report and Special Prosecutor
On September 29, 2008 the Justice Department's Inspector General (IG) released a report on the matter that found most of the firings were politically motivated and improper. The next day Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed a special prosecutor, Nora Dannehy, to decide whether criminal charges should be brought against Gonzales and other officials involved in the firings.[45] The IG's report contained "substantial evidence" that party politics drove a number of the firings, and IG Glenn Fine said in a statement that Gonzales had "abdicated his responsibility to safeguard the integrity and independence of the department."[161] The report itself stopped short of resolving questions about higher White House involvement in the matter, because of what it said were the refusal to cooperate of a number of key players, among them Karl Rove, Senator Pete Domenici and Harriet Miers and because the White House refused to hand over its documents related to the firings.[162]

They refused to cooperate with the investigation
 
And now she's blaming BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

It's nearly time to mention that Cheney worked for Halliburton and Palin had a baby.
 

Forum List

Back
Top