DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim… DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim… | The Last Refuge 15 JUN 2019 ~ The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders. Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike. The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked. In a court filing (full pdf below) the scale of sketchy has increased exponentially. Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI NOT review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report. The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…and used the claim therein as an official position….which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC. https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...wdstrike-1.png Stone - De 123 DOJ Response to MTC Crowdstrike Reports | Government (46K views) ~~~~~~ SO not only did F-troop not look at the servers. They didn’t even look at the report of Hillary’s IT Crowdstrike company who made the claims. The FBI needs to be disbanded. Tired of hearing about the good ones. They have all remained 100% silent. Why isn’t there at least -one- Serpico in the FBI? It boggles the mind that the full intelligence apparatus of the United States government is relying on a report they have never even been allowed to see or confirm created by a paid contractor for a so called political victim that would not allow the FBI to investigate their claim. Is there nobody who can draw and quarter these mf’ers?! (to quote one of our Sharia-loving, America-hating Muslim representatives) I believe this is part of A.G. Barr’s investigation into what started the investigation against President Trump. Every American Citizen should be frightened that our federal government can use unvetted and what amounts to nothing but hearsay information, to prosecute American citizens. There is not enough scrutiny of the FISA Court role in this coup attempt. The Judges are not so stupid they could not understand the seriousness and unprecedented importance of a “MOTION TO SPY ON HILLARY”S PRESIDENTIAL OPPONENT”. The FISC held no hearings for the record, asked no questions to confirm that the “evidence” was verified, or that it was proper to spy on a Presidential candidate, President-elect, or President. When it became clear they were lied to, the FISC never held a disciplinary hearing to punish the perjurers and false-oath swearers. The FISC never withdrew “nunc pro tunc” the improvidently-granted spy warrants to remove any protective cover they provided to the coup conspirators. The FISC is complicit. It completely failed in its Constitutional responsibilities as a check on the DOJ/FBI, and protector of the 4th Amendment. If the FISC was not complicit in this coup, it never would have authorized spying on the President without hearings and verification. If it was not complicit, it would have disciplined the liars like any non-secret Federal Court, and “sua sponte” withdrawn the fraudulently-issued warrant. . Chief Justice Roberts failed in his supervisory responsibility for the FISC . The “subpoena-happy” Congress should subpoena these secret Star Chamber judges to ask why they were derelict in their duty. One partial remedy (in addition to removing the current complicit FISC judges for bad behavior) is to form a “defense Team” (lke the defense teams in military tribunals, and public defenders, to review and question FISA applications – especially because the defendants are not represented in any way.