Does this Reflect the View of Most Liberals?

[Richard-H]

The difference between liberals and conservatives:

Liberals are typically more concerned about -re-distribution of the eggs that the Golden Goose lays--while conservatives are typically more concerned about the health of the Golden Goose.

Well, with 8 years of tax cuts and the current wave of corporate profits, the golden goose should be pretty healthy right now. Guess not!

Liberals believe that Government can take care of all their needs--and can do it better than the private sector.

Everytime the government trusts the private sector by lowering taxes and easing regulations, disaster occurs. The private sector has repeadedly proven that it will not manage itself in a responsible and ethical manner. The private sector degenerates to a theivery at every chance it gets.

Liberals in essense believe in socialism--even though it has failed in every country it's been tried.

Like England, Canada, France, Japan and Germany, huh? In fact, Russia, China and aalmost the entire eastern Europe are reverting back to socilism. The great free market experiment has been a gross failure.

"The problem with socialism is that government eventually runs out of other peoples money to spend"--Margaret Thatcher.

For as long as working people are allowed to work, they will generate wealth.

 

[rikules]

Yes, that is the consensus of most on the Left. It is not a matter whether gov't has the power to do something. It is a matter of whether their actions will result in something good or bad. Thus limiting handguns in school zones sounds like a great exercise of federal power. Except the USSC declared they didnt have that power (Lopez).

YOU are a complete moron.

NO.
That is NOT the opinion of MOST liberals.

However, I have no doubt that rabbid would have no problem with a CONSERVATIVE government diong whatever IT wanted (rounding up and executing liberals, feminsits, homosexulas, atheist)

you idiot conservatives keep asserting that sane and ratinal liberals want a strict disciplinarian and authoritarian government. We DO NOT!

we want a government that defends the FREEDOMS and RIGHTS of ALL citizens (including gays, atheist, women, blacks, minorities)

unlike conservatives we do NOT want our government involved in our private lives

unlike conservatives we envision a government that works to secure a decent life for ALL cirtizens

as opposed to the dog-eat-dog then forces dog to eat out of garbage cans utopia that conservatives are so fond of

 

[daveman]

Yes, that is the consensus of most on the Left. It is not a matter whether gov't has the power to do something. It is a matter of whether their actions will result in something good or bad. Thus limiting handguns in school zones sounds like a great exercise of federal power. Except the USSC declared they didnt have that power (Lopez).

YOU are a complete moron.

NO.
That is NOT the opinion of MOST liberals.

However, I have no doubt that rabbid would have no problem with a CONSERVATIVE government diong whatever IT wanted (rounding up and executing liberals, feminsits, homosexulas, atheist)

you idiot conservatives keep asserting that sane and ratinal liberals want a strict disciplinarian and authoritarian government. We DO NOT!

we want a government that defends the FREEDOMS and RIGHTS of ALL citizens (including gays, atheist, women, blacks, minorities)

unlike conservatives we do NOT want our government involved in our private lives

unlike conservatives we envision a government that works to secure a decent life for ALL cirtizens

as opposed to the dog-eat-dog then forces dog to eat out of garbage cans utopia that conservatives are so fond of

You really haven't been paying attention to what the government's been doing lately, have you?