Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Benghazi incident was totally outrageous and to be honest, if it wasn't for the MSM, Hillary would have already of had to drop out of the Presidential race.
Perhaps, but I certainly don't WANT her to drop out. Not since George McGovern have the democrats run a candidate so absolutely guaranteed to lose.
Hillary is a gift of the presidency to the GOP - who will fuck it up, as they always do. My big concern is that the GOP will actually put that idiot Trump in office.
I think we Rightists do have some problems with Putin. However regarding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh, Al-Nusra et al, he is doing the correct thing, which is why we tend to support him.
Putin is a KGB thug with aspirations to recreate the old USSR. He is no friend to America or American interests.
That doesn't change the fact that Obama is a weak and ineffectual leader in contrast to Putin who is highly effective.
What law did Oblama sign to give the rebels $600 million?
You DO grasp that the commander in chief determines foreign policy? Aid to ISIS is purely based on Obama ordering it.
Who's applauding everything Putin does, not Obama? He finally starts helping against ISIS and has people like you creaming in their jeans.Actaully Comrade Shitferbrains, Obama is Putin's bitch.The Republicans are Putin's bitch. They seem to cheer everything he does.
What law did Oblama sign to give the rebels $600 million?
You DO grasp that the commander in chief determines foreign policy? Aid to ISIS is purely based on Obama ordering it.
The Leftists just don't get it, well either they don't get it or they do get it and they don't care. Obama is their Fake Messiah, he could order them all to jump into an active volcano and they'd do it.
The Leftists possess absolutely no independent thought process whatsoever.
I think we Rightists do have some problems with Putin. However regarding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh, Al-Nusra et al, he is doing the correct thing, which is why we tend to support him.
Putin is a KGB thug with aspirations to recreate the old USSR. He is no friend to America or American interests.
That doesn't change the fact that Obama is a weak and ineffectual leader in contrast to Putin who is highly effective.
WW3 would probably be the final push towards globalization.
Almost everything else about him is globalization, so why not?
What law did Oblama sign to give the rebels $600 million?
You DO grasp that the commander in chief determines foreign policy? Aid to ISIS is purely based on Obama ordering it.
The Leftists just don't get it, well either they don't get it or they do get it and they don't care. Obama is their Fake Messiah, he could order them all to jump into an active volcano and they'd do it.
The Leftists possess absolutely no independent thought process whatsoever.
Nice meltdown. You're on the board.
If Obama wanted to start WWIII he would take Trump's lead and call 1.4 billion Muslims evil.
Rather than treating terrorism like an isolated action whereby we hunt down and kill the evil terrorist cells, he would inflate this conflict into a grand war for civilization, enjoining entire nations and whole cultures, and running constant television adds scaring people into thinking that the entire nation is under attack.
He would get people to be afraid not just of isolated groups but world powers, like the entire Arab world.
The key to the Republican War on Terror is that it must be a full-fledged military war against a great power - it must be conducted against nations not merely terrorist cells. It must be the kind of threat that we faced during WWII so that they can use national security to get elected. And once elected, the war allows them to control the headlines, and use the fog of war to pass unpopular policies and grow the surveillance powers of Washington.
ISIS needs the American right to inflate their power,
ISIS needs the American right to constantly broadcast fear, to make ISIS seem stronger and larger than they actually are.
ISIS wants to be considered as an equivalent power to the USA, and the Republicans oblige because terrorism benefits the GOP politically. The more the GOO can talk about terrorism, the greater their chances of getting elected. This is why the backward, tottering Soviet Union was so useful.
By fabricating ISIS into a great power, the Republicans enable ISIS to intimidate Muslim moderates and THUS consolidate their regional power.
The biggest danger for ISIS and the Republican Party is if the current friction between the USA and radical Islam can't be turned into a Big War. Radicals on both sides require the fear of a Big Enemy to gain and maintain power.
This is why they call terrorism a WAR - because only then can they turn it into a big government event that implicates whole nations.
God help us. We have a political party whose actual survival depends on terrorism. We have a political party that would actually benefit if we got attacked again. This is beyond scary.
You are the one redundantly reiterating that Oblama signed a law for support, no one else, yet you have failed at your fallacy of truth over opinion..What law did Oblama sign to give the rebels $600 million?
You DO grasp that the commander in chief determines foreign policy? Aid to ISIS is purely based on Obama ordering it.
The Leftists just don't get it, well either they don't get it or they do get it and they don't care. Obama is their Fake Messiah, he could order them all to jump into an active volcano and they'd do it.
The Leftists possess absolutely no independent thought process whatsoever.
I'm waiting for the DVD release...Who wants WWIII over Syria? Please sign in.
Do you have a caps lock problem with your keyboard or do you just yell all the time?If Obama wanted to start WWIII he would take Trump's lead and call 1.4 billion Muslims evil.
Rather than treating terrorism like an isolated action whereby we hunt down and kill the evil terrorist cells, he would inflate this conflict into a grand war for civilization, enjoining entire nations and whole cultures, and running constant television adds scaring people into thinking that the entire nation is under attack.
He would get people to be afraid not just of isolated groups but world powers, like the entire Arab world.
The key to the Republican War on Terror is that it must be a full-fledged military war against a great power - it must be conducted against nations not merely terrorist cells. It must be the kind of threat that we faced during WWII so that they can use national security to get elected. And once elected, the war allows them to control the headlines, and use the fog of war to pass unpopular policies and grow the surveillance powers of Washington.
ISIS needs the American right to inflate their power,
ISIS needs the American right to constantly broadcast fear, to make ISIS seem stronger and larger than they actually are.
ISIS wants to be considered as an equivalent power to the USA, and the Republicans oblige because terrorism benefits the GOP politically. The more the GOO can talk about terrorism, the greater their chances of getting elected. This is why the backward, tottering Soviet Union was so useful.
By fabricating ISIS into a great power, the Republicans enable ISIS to intimidate Muslim moderates and THUS consolidate their regional power.
The biggest danger for ISIS and the Republican Party is if the current friction between the USA and radical Islam can't be turned into a Big War. Radicals on both sides require the fear of a Big Enemy to gain and maintain power.
This is why they call terrorism a WAR - because only then can they turn it into a big government event that implicates whole nations.
God help us. We have a political party whose actual survival depends on terrorism. We have a political party that would actually benefit if we got attacked again. This is beyond scary.
I AGREE WITH MANY OF THE ISSUES YOU ALLEGE, THE REPUGNANTS NEED A BOGEYMAN TO CONTINUE THE "WAR ON TERROR" (WINK, WINK).
BUT THE DEMOPUBLICANS ARE CONTROLLED BY THE WART PARTY AND ISRAHELL.
IN 1996 MANY REPUBLICANS AGREE TO HELP ISRAHELL STEAL SYRIAN TERRITORY .
OBAMA SEES THAT AS A MANDATE. HE HAS NO CHOICE. THEY HAVE HIJACKED OUR FOREIGN POLICY.
The USA should have conquered the world, just like Britain did....WW3 would probably be the final push towards globalization.
Almost everything else about him is globalization, so why not?
Also, the Leftists were always almost hysterically anti-globalisation, they protested like they do at EVERY Globalist Summit, for years and years.
All of a sudden now Obama is in the WH, they appear to have no problem with globalisation....as I said, Obama is their Fake Messiah....and of course they're the ultimate hypocrites.
Damn that presidential thug...."I'm no wimp, read my lips."I think we Rightists do have some problems with Putin. However regarding ISIL/ISIS/Daesh, Al-Nusra et al, he is doing the correct thing, which is why we tend to support him.
Putin is a KGB thug with aspirations to recreate the old USSR. He is no friend to America or American interests.
That doesn't change the fact that Obama is a weak and ineffectual leader in contrast to Putin who is highly effective.
And the CIA are thugs. George H.W. Bush was Director of the CIA, directly from Langley he became Veep and then President.
'Um, whatever....
obama and the cult appreciate your deflective support.
I don't support Obama, so I don't get what you're attempting to communicate.
Hmm... It is stated clearly.
I'm saying that obama is working with those intent upon injury to the United States, toward the goal of injuring the United States. (That's why I said he's PUTIN'S BITCH")
Can you give an example where Obama is Putin bitch? Or you are one of Putin bitch because you adore him so much.
And what do you expect Obama should do in dealing with Russian and China? Stay out of their way? Are you some kind of military tacticians or penguin tacticians?
Yes stay out of their way. Who appointed Washington DC the Dictatorship of the world? Who appointed Washington DC with the unilateral right to dictate what other nations can or cannot do?
That's right NOBODY appointed them, they appointed themselves because they think that they're "special"
It's a pity that Washington DC doesn't throw it's weight around and try and swing the hammer at:
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Pakistan....just for starters.
