Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Considering they dont have to worry about what the major superpowers have (including China and Russia) some old relics are probably good enough.
Besides, thier planned use would be as a final retaliation if WMD's managed to wipe out a significant portion of Israel's population.
I'm inclined to agree. I'm no friend of Israel, but as far as I'm aware they've never threatened to use them. And even I can see that if Iran developed a nuclear warhead and viable delivery system they'd slam the threat of its use on the discussion table like a gunslinger would with his six-gun whenever they don't get their way.
The issue with Iran or any of the other Middle East countries getting a bomb is and will continue to be the strategic vulnerability of the dense Israeli population compared to its neighbors. 3-4 nukes in the right places in Israel would lead to at least a decimation (in the classical sense) of the population, while the same response to the arab countries would be damaging, but not fatal. THIS is the logic that scares the crap out of Israel, the thought that one of thier enemies could think that they could out-survive a retaliatory strike.
I'm inclined to agree. I'm no friend of Israel, but as far as I'm aware they've never threatened to use them. And even I can see that if Iran developed a nuclear warhead and viable delivery system they'd slam the threat of its use on the discussion table like a gunslinger would with his six-gun whenever they don't get their way.
The issue with Iran or any of the other Middle East countries getting a bomb is and will continue to be the strategic vulnerability of the dense Israeli population compared to its neighbors. 3-4 nukes in the right places in Israel would lead to at least a decimation (in the classical sense) of the population, while the same response to the arab countries would be damaging, but not fatal. THIS is the logic that scares the crap out of Israel, the thought that one of thier enemies could think that they could out-survive a retaliatory strike.
And this is what scares everyone. Should a country like Iran strike Israel with a nuclear attack that pretty much wipes Israel out, I think we all could envision Israel retaliating with their full arsenal, which I believe to be 300 to 400 nuclear warheads. This the the Armageddon that we should all fear.
The issue with Iran or any of the other Middle East countries getting a bomb is and will continue to be the strategic vulnerability of the dense Israeli population compared to its neighbors. 3-4 nukes in the right places in Israel would lead to at least a decimation (in the classical sense) of the population, while the same response to the arab countries would be damaging, but not fatal. THIS is the logic that scares the crap out of Israel, the thought that one of thier enemies could think that they could out-survive a retaliatory strike.
And this is what scares everyone. Should a country like Iran strike Israel with a nuclear attack that pretty much wipes Israel out, I think we all could envision Israel retaliating with their full arsenal, which I believe to be 300 to 400 nuclear warheads. This the the Armageddon that we should all fear.
Muslims would never point a nuclear bomb at a land they consider very Holy, again you guys make it sound like Arab goverments are plotting against Israel, when they have their own things to worry about....also they are all in peace with Israel...so this makes no sense, what about Israeli nukes pointed at Arab countries is it okay to wipe out Arabs off the face of the earth?
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. .
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. .
Actions speak louder than words.
The IDF murder on a daily basis and, from time to time, commit mass murder.
They have a record of piracy and murder on the high seas, serious human rights violations on land and sea, are guilty of more crimes under international law than any Saddam ever managed and have killed a lot more people.
Iran isn't even on the score card when you compare them to Israel.
And this is what scares everyone. Should a country like Iran strike Israel with a nuclear attack that pretty much wipes Israel out, I think we all could envision Israel retaliating with their full arsenal, which I believe to be 300 to 400 nuclear warheads. This the the Armageddon that we should all fear.
Muslims would never point a nuclear bomb at a land they consider very Holy, again you guys make it sound like Arab goverments are plotting against Israel, when they have their own things to worry about....also they are all in peace with Israel...so this makes no sense, what about Israeli nukes pointed at Arab countries is it okay to wipe out Arabs off the face of the earth?
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. Iran on the other hand loves doing that.
And the prime nuke target would be the Tel Aviv area, which is mostly Jewish and contains no Islamic holy sites. I dont think they would bomb Jerusalem, but they would try to gun for the Jewish Suburbs.
Muslims would never point a nuclear bomb at a land they consider very Holy, again you guys make it sound like Arab goverments are plotting against Israel, when they have their own things to worry about....also they are all in peace with Israel...so this makes no sense, what about Israeli nukes pointed at Arab countries is it okay to wipe out Arabs off the face of the earth?
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. Iran on the other hand loves doing that.
And the prime nuke target would be the Tel Aviv area, which is mostly Jewish and contains no Islamic holy sites. I dont think they would bomb Jerusalem, but they would try to gun for the Jewish Suburbs.
The IDF threatens to occupy gaza almost everyday
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. Iran on the other hand loves doing that.
And the prime nuke target would be the Tel Aviv area, which is mostly Jewish and contains no Islamic holy sites. I dont think they would bomb Jerusalem, but they would try to gun for the Jewish Suburbs.
The IDF threatens to occupy gaza almost everyday
If they do its because people keep launching rockets from there. No rockets, no need to invade.
Because Israel doesnt state on an almost daily basis that they want to wipe the arab/persian countries off the face of the earth. Iran on the other hand loves doing that.
And the prime nuke target would be the Tel Aviv area, which is mostly Jewish and contains no Islamic holy sites. I dont think they would bomb Jerusalem, but they would try to gun for the Jewish Suburbs.
The IDF threatens to occupy gaza almost everyday
If they do its because people keep launching rockets from there. No rockets, no need to invade.
The IDF threatens to occupy gaza almost everyday
If they do its because people keep launching rockets from there. No rockets, no need to invade.
If there were no occupying Israeli forces, no need for rockets.
You seem to forget, Israel is the invader and occupier.
Were the French resistance of WWII wrong to attack German forces?
The IDF threatens to occupy gaza almost everyday
If they do its because people keep launching rockets from there. No rockets, no need to invade.
If there were no occupying Israeli forces, no need for rockets.
You seem to forget, Israel is the invader and occupier.
Were the French resistance of WWII wrong to attack German forces?
If they do its because people keep launching rockets from there. No rockets, no need to invade.
If there were no occupying Israeli forces, no need for rockets.
You seem to forget, Israel is the invader and occupier.
Were the French resistance of WWII wrong to attack German forces?
The israelis left gaza. Gazans can now control thier own destiny, but they would rather launch rockets.
The France/Germany WWII thing does not apply, as there were Jews in palestine before the partition. That was also a declared war.
If there were no occupying Israeli forces, no need for rockets.
You seem to forget, Israel is the invader and occupier.
Were the French resistance of WWII wrong to attack German forces?
The israelis left gaza. Gazans can now control thier own destiny, but they would rather launch rockets.
The France/Germany WWII thing does not apply, as there were Jews in palestine before the partition. That was also a declared war.
Israel still attacks gaza you know that right? No they don't control anything. They have no power over their borders
The israelis left gaza. Gazans can now control thier own destiny, but they would rather launch rockets.
The France/Germany WWII thing does not apply, as there were Jews in palestine before the partition. That was also a declared war.
Israel still attacks gaza you know that right? No they don't control anything. They have no power over their borders
Because they keep firing rockets over the border.
Israel still attacks gaza you know that right? No they don't control anything. They have no power over their borders
Because they keep firing rockets over the border.
Not true, they attacked many times without any previous rocket fire. And they occupy the seas and shoot at any fisherman who pass a certain line.
Most of the rocket fire is retaliatory
The israelis left gaza. Gazans can now control thier own destiny, but they would rather launch rockets..
The israelis left gaza. Gazans can now control thier own destiny, but they would rather launch rockets.
The France/Germany WWII thing does not apply, as there were Jews in palestine before the partition. That was also a declared war.
Israel still attacks gaza you know that right? No they don't control anything. They have no power over their borders
Because they keep firing rockets over the border.
Because they keep firing rockets over the border.
Not true, they attacked many times without any previous rocket fire. And they occupy the seas and shoot at any fisherman who pass a certain line.
Most of the rocket fire is retaliatory
If they need to enforce maritime orders to keep OFFENSIVE weapons out of Gaza, they can keep vessels out of the area. A RESPONSIBLE government in Gaza would have no problems with Israel..
Problem really is --- Gaza is more interested in access to what Israel has. Because THEIR LEADERSHIP doesn't value hospitals, factories, industry, education, or any other modern infrastructure. It's obvious when you look at their "priorities" in governing.
