Do You Think Obama Is Honest???

[Cuyo]

Again, I haven't done so because of the name. It appears as though you have no clue about the site you sourced.

I'll ask one last time:

Do you think Conservapedia is meant to give an unbiased view of things?

And when your done with his question answer mine.

You ain't ducking out of this one. I want to know which article you read and were unable to determine that it was crap.

That's a loaded question that assumes that all of the articles on that site are crap.

It's a dishonest question that doesn't deserve a response.

Out of curiosity I just looked up Michael Strahan and that article appears to be honest, although I haven't cross-checked the citations.

But that's not the sort of article you cited, is it?

Art, do you have a link to his alleged use of the site as a citation? He's dodging me.

 

[mudwhistle]

Again, I haven't done so because of the name. It appears as though you have no clue about the site you sourced.

I'll ask one last time:

Do you think Conservapedia is meant to give an unbiased view of things?

I don't think it's a Daily Kos....if that's what you mean....or a World Socialist Web Page.

I accessed one article and cross-checked the information and found it was honest.

Still, I think you're prejudice against it for the name alone.

Which article did you read and cross check?

Link?

Try going to my thread on the ACLU. It's there. That seems to be the big beef.

 

[Ernie S.]

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

Dude, how old are you?

Can you seriously make it through the first couple sentences of any 'conservapedia' article and not know it's crap?

Just because you don't understand the big words doesn't mean it's crap.

 

[Article 15]

And when your done with his question answer mine.

You ain't ducking out of this one. I want to know which article you read and were unable to determine that it was crap.

That's a loaded question that assumes that all of the articles on that site are crap.

It's a dishonest question that doesn't deserve a response.

Out of curiosity I just looked up Michael Strahan and that article appears to be honest, although I haven't cross-checked the citations.

But that's not the sort of article you cited, is it?

Art, do you have a link to his alleged use of the site as a citation? He's dodging me.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/law-and-justice-system/182719-the-aclu-is-anything-but-american.html

 

[Cuyo]

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

Dude, how old are you?

Can you seriously make it through the first couple sentences of any 'conservapedia' article and not know it's crap?

Just because you don't understand the big words doesn't mean it's crap.

Not funny. Don't quit your day job.

So you too? Do you consider this 'conservapedia' to be a reliable source?

 

[mudwhistle]

And when your done with his question answer mine.

You ain't ducking out of this one. I want to know which article you read and were unable to determine that it was crap.

That's a loaded question that assumes that all of the articles on that site are crap.

It's a dishonest question that doesn't deserve a response.

Out of curiosity I just looked up Michael Strahan and that article appears to be honest, although I haven't cross-checked the citations.

But that's not the sort of article you cited, is it?

Art, do you have a link to his alleged use of the site as a citation? He's dodging me.

I'm not dodging you....I'm just not jumping through hoops to please you. I have a life....and a job and I'm in the middle of getting ready to go to it.

 

[Cuyo]

That's a loaded question that assumes that all of the articles on that site are crap.

It's a dishonest question that doesn't deserve a response.

Out of curiosity I just looked up Michael Strahan and that article appears to be honest, although I haven't cross-checked the citations.

But that's not the sort of article you cited, is it?

Art, do you have a link to his alleged use of the site as a citation? He's dodging me.

I'm not dodging you....I'm just not jumping through hoops to please you. I have a life....and a job and I'm in the middle of getting ready to go to it.

In the time you took to explain why you're not answering the question, you could have answered it.

But it's cool, I suppose it's actually better that you're ashamed of what you've done rather than trying to defend it and making yourself look ridiculous. It'd be even better if you openly disavowed it but we'll take what we can get.

 

[L.K.Eder]

I'm not a big poll starter.

You're not too big on the truth ether are you?

Actually, I'm a pretty big fan of it.

ether is highly volatile, flammable, and addictive.

 

[Article 15]

You're not too big on the truth ether are you?

Actually, I'm a pretty big fan of it.

ether is highly volatile, flammable, and addictive.

And restores magic points!

 

[Cuyo]

Actually, I'm a pretty big fan of it.

ether is highly volatile, flammable, and addictive.

And restores magic points!

And it's 'the shit that make ya soul burn slow.'

 

[mudwhistle]

Out of curiosity I just looked up Michael Strahan and that article appears to be honest, although I haven't cross-checked the citations.

But that's not the sort of article you cited, is it?

Art, do you have a link to his alleged use of the site as a citation? He's dodging me.

I'm not dodging you....I'm just not jumping through hoops to please you. I have a life....and a job and I'm in the middle of getting ready to go to it.

In the time you took to explain why you're not answering the question, you could have answered it.

But it's cool, I suppose it's actually better that you're ashamed of what you've done rather than trying to defend it and making yourself look ridiculous. It'd be even better if you openly disavowed it but we'll take what we can get.

If it makes you feel better feel that way, fine.

Art gave you the link and you're still whining. You just can't please some people.

Check it out for yourself and get back to me.....or not.

 

[L.K.Eder]

He's an empty suit with no subsatnce

I would shot myself before that thought ever gave birth to an action of stupidity.

who would you vote for if the choice was obama or hitler?

Whar is bigderp?

Whar?

he is busy constantly giving birth to actions of stupidity

 

[Article 15]

Here's da link

ACLU - Conservapedia

 

[Article 15]

who would you vote for if the choice was obama or hitler?

Whar is bigderp?

Whar?

he is busy constantly giving birth to actions of stupidity

This is why I am pro-choice.

 

[Article 15]

Here's da link

ACLU - Conservapedia

^----- No bias at all there. Just a down the middle assessment of what the ACLU is all about.

Yesirree

 

[Ernie S.]

Three idiots voted two said they think he's honest and one said they don't know. Who in Gods names doesn't know when someone is lying?

obama is the biggest lying sack of sit that has ever lived in the white hous.

The bigger problem with the vote results is the one who took the time to vote "I don't know" Why the fuck would anyone vote to confirm they lack the ability to form an opinion?

I think a "I don't know" answer can be taken a couple of ways.

Ether the person who said that couldn't commit themselves one way or another or they didn't want to be honest. They didn't want to support or condemn Obama.

So, either dishonest or stupid? Neither is much to be proud of.

 

[Ernie S.]

Dude, how old are you?

Can you seriously make it through the first couple sentences of any 'conservapedia' article and not know it's crap?

Just because you don't understand the big words doesn't mean it's crap.

Not funny. Don't quit your day job.

So you too? Do you consider this 'conservapedia' to be a reliable source?

Truthfully, I've never been there. I wouldn't know other than to disregard your opinion.

Edit: I just read the article linked above. Biased? Yes. Untrue? No.
I have read of the ACLU defending Conservative principles, but I would estimate, Conservatives make up less than 5% of their clients.

 

[mudwhistle]

Here's da link

ACLU - Conservapedia

^----- No bias at all there. Just a down the middle assessment of what the ACLU is all about.

Yesirree

If you spot any lies in the article please point em out and provide links supporting this.

 

[Claudette]

I don't think he's dishonest per se.

I think he's a left wing ideologue who wants to change America into his view of what it should be. He got into office and reality hit him right in the chops.

He surrounded himself with folks from his Chicago machine and they know even less than he does about running all aspects of the country.

He doesn't have the experience to be POTUS. Doubt the guy has ever held a real job in his life. He knows nothing about what it takes to run a business or a country. He's in way over his head.

 

[The Gadfly]

Yeah but how do you feel about him overall? Will you vote for him in 2012?

He's an empty suit with no subsatnce

Will you vote for him in 2012

I would shot myself before that thought ever gave birth to an action of stupidity.

who would you vote for if the choice was obama or hitler?

Dishonest question, since Hitler is not on the ballot; but the answer is...."NONE OF THE ABOVE"! Happy now?