Do you support forced redistribution of blood?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Reasoning, Apr 15, 2010.

?

Do you support forced redistribution of blood?

  1. Yes!

    1 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. No!

    2 vote(s)
    66.7%
  1. Reasoning
    Offline

    Reasoning Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    403
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +71
    Redistribution means taking from some to give to others. But from whom, and in what proportion? And to whom, and in what proportion? How much? These are incredibly obvious questions but nobody asks them, let alone answer them. Why not? For two different reasons.

    Those who support redistribution tend not to ask or allow others to ask basic questions about it, out of feelings of guilt and shame. Redistribution needs to be believed in and if you question it in any way there must be something wrong with you.

    Those who oppose redistribution simply view it as stealing, and asking these questions is akin to asking what optimal amount of mugging should be tolerated in a city. It’s repugnant.

    But let’s you and I think about it a little bit, on this April 15th day of taxes and spending. Most of the federal budget is spent on redistribution in various forms: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, food stamps, housing assistance, and many more. Let’s be a little abstract so that we can distance ourselves both from the guilt and the repugnance that quashes our natural curiosity. Let’s ask some basic questions.

    How much money should be redistributed from the wealthy to the poor? Is it a fixed number that depends on the needs of the poor, or is it a variable number that depends on the profits of the wealthy? What does it mean to be wealthy, high recent income or lifetime accumulated assets?

    How should the largess be distributed? Equally to everyone below a certain threshold? Should those who are poorer receive more? What does it mean to be poor, low recent income or lifetime accumulated debt?

    How often should the redistribution took place? Once, to account for past injustices, or repeatedly, like clockwork?

    Most importantly, how can we objectively think about these questions without resorting to character accusations?

    One approach is to proceed by analogy. Start with your body. Just about everybody has extra blood. By all of the standard arguments for redistribution – need, excess wealth, not the result of hard work, fairness – blood should be redistributed. Along with your 1040, you should send along a baggie of blood. Should everybody be forced to redistribute blood?

    People need blood. According to America’s Blood Centers, someone needs blood every two seconds. One in seven people entering a hospital will need blood. One pint of blood can save up to three lives. Here, the redistribution questions are easy: everybody who needs blood for medical reasons should get all that they need, whenever they need it.

    Only a small minority have the appropriate blood. Only 38 percent of the U.S. population is eligible. And everybody in that blood-wealthy group can spare a little. The amount of blood to be redistributed depends only on the amount needed to save people, not on the amount the donors can spare.

    Your blood type is not the result of hard work or ingenuity. Taking some of your blood, unlike taking some of your money, won’t affect your incentive to work. Therefore, we could redistribute this repeatedly.

    It is only fair that those who have better blood through no credit of their own and who could safely give some of it up, be forced to do so, to redistribute it to those who need blood through no fault of their own and whose lives could be saved.

    Blood is better than money because politicians can’t even pocket any. All of it goes to the intended recipients.

    Do you support forced redistribution of money? Do you support forced redistribution of blood? If your answers to the two questions are not the same, you have a problem on your hands.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. xotoxi
    Offline

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    30,322
    Thanks Received:
    5,203
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +5,492
    Didn't read it.
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    It's easier to just see how much I feel like doing for myself in the morning and have someone else do what I don't feel like doing for the rest of the day.
    If you draw a line you might find yourself on the wrong side of it some day.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2010
  4. Reasoning
    Offline

    Reasoning Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    403
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +71
    :clap2:
     
  5. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    HUH? I have never heard of the forced taking of blood.
     
  6. Reasoning
    Offline

    Reasoning Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    403
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +71
    please read the op before replying lol...
     
  7. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    Are you truly that dense, us?

    I can't believe the count hasn't weighed in.
     
  8. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    It's a straw man, as those who believe is market democracy and welfare also believe in human rights- it's the protection of human rights and well-being that creates the need for social protections in the first place. The OP falls apart when one realizes that it ends up coming down to a simple matter of moral philosophy: should one's very body be free or the property of the masses. Few would answer in the latter and I suspect none truly believe it when they're on the wrong side of the equation.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 15, 2010
  9. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,156
    Thanks Received:
    10,167
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,729
    well if you have to take yer body to work every day and then hand over 90% of what you made,, I think they'll demand your blood too lessen you were borned a turnip..
     
  10. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0

    A fine attack on the capitalist system as ultimately a form of slavery whereby a man is reduced to a commodity, a fleshy cog in the machine for the production of Capital.

    Marx and Engels said something similar in the Communist Manifesto.

    Does your adoption of such rhetoric indicate that you've become a Communist or are you just rambling incoherently?
     

Share This Page