Do you smoke tobacco

Discussion in 'Health and Lifestyle' started by Wry Catcher, Apr 29, 2012.

?

Do you Smoke?

  1. Yes, I smoke

    3 vote(s)
    17.6%
  2. Yes, I smoke and want to quit

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  3. No, I have never smoked

    6 vote(s)
    35.3%
  4. No, I quit.

    7 vote(s)
    41.2%
  1. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,766
    Thanks Received:
    4,242
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,162
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2012
  2. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,298
    Thanks Received:
    11,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,234
    I much prefer clove cigs. but Obama outlawed those.
     
  3. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,766
    Thanks Received:
    4,242
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,162
    Bump
     
  4. alan1
    Offline

    alan1 USMB Mod Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    18,845
    Thanks Received:
    3,577
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Shoveling the ashes
    Ratings:
    +3,769
    Here is the way I see it.

    The primary funding of SCHIP is tobacco taxes.
    Anybody that doesn't help fund SCHIP hates poor children.
    If you are not using tobacco then you are not helping to fund medical care for poor children.
    That makes you a hater of poor children.
    Don't be a hater.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  5. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    It might be called the Cancer Research act but it doesn't provide for any actual research, the money goes to feed the insatialble maw of funding social programs.
     
  6. Swagger
    Offline

    Swagger Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,161
    Thanks Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    European Far Right
    Ratings:
    +5,512
    Yes. I also enjoy both weed and cannabis resin (just had one, actually).
     
  7. Moonglow
    Offline

    Moonglow Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    81,881
    Thanks Received:
    8,029
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +29,551
    send some my way
     
  8. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    My home state embarrasses me constantly.
     
  9. Alan Stallion
    Offline

    Alan Stallion Civil Rights Advocate

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,891
    Thanks Received:
    365
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    Ratings:
    +488
    Nope. Never have; never will. I find it rather disgusting.


    However, as anti-smoking as I am, I oppose tobacco taxes.

    It grows government and becomes dependent on people to continue smoking to fund such government. If revenue falls due to fewer people paying into these taxes, somehow it will eventually come around to the rest of us to have to make up for the shortage. So ironically, they need to encourage smoking to fund such programs, and some of the insipid anti-smoking commercials like the "truth" campaign only antagonize people.

    When Rob "Meathead" Reiner got his tobacco tax passed (1998's Proposition 10), it funded the First Five California campaign. Subsequently, this group (with Reiner as chairman) would illegally promote a new initiative (2006's Proposition 82) for "Universal Pre-school" (Reiner would eventually have to resign from FFC because of the obvious conflict). Luckily that initiative was defeated.

    I will be voting against this Prop 29.

    But let's flip things around. Say I put on an initiative promising to fund cancer research with a million-dollar a pack tax. How would that turn out? I could taunt people who vote against that as being insensitive toward people suffering from cancer (and I have friends who are going through that hell). But it’s not practical to have a million dollar tax on a pack of smokes. But even a dollar a pack on addicted smokers heavily burdens them already more than the existing taxes do now.

    It would be easy for me to pick on smokers, as much as their habit has been a nuisance on my life, by putting an additional financial burden on them, but then the next tax increase idea will be on something I like (e.g., sugar). I am weary people targeting minorities.
     
  10. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,248
    Thanks Received:
    14,915
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,035
    Wry's a hater.

    Why does he hate chillun?
     

Share This Page