Do you notice how gun nuts never talk about any limits to gun ownership?

[Billy000]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

 

[Chuz Life]

Oh to be young again.

I remember when I had MY first beer.

 

[Billy000]

Oh to be young again.

I remember when I had MY first beer.

You know I’m right.

 

[22lcidw]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

Did those African American adults get punished for slandering, insulting, threatening those high school kids? When it comes to guns you may have a point. But when the laws start, they do not end.

 

[Chuz Life]

Oh to be young again.

I remember when I had MY first beer.

You know I’m right.

I know (from your post) that you either do not know or care to know what the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is.

 

[Snouter]

Billy is fucking wasted. LOL

 

[leecross]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

You had a direction to start this OP.

I disagreed with it, but at least you were headed in a viable direction.

Then you lost focus.

Here, maybe this will help.

The more guns, the better.

We can only shoot one at a time, so you are worried about nothing on the number of guns we have.

And you should be glad we have as big and as bad ass weapons as we do.

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

You hate Trump?

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter his ambitions if he woke up and wanted to become King.

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter the ambitions of a President Hillary Clinton if she somehow succeeded in deposing DJT and soon after being sworn in she woke up and wanted to become Queen.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

Tell us when human nature becomes antiquated and out of date.

That is when I will give another moments thought to the 2nd Amendment, which exists to protect us from human nature.

Give some people the power to make us all subjects and they will try to do so.

Obama tried it and all he could manage was politicizing every department of the Federal government.

Just think if there had been no 2A!

Remember when he bought billions and billions of rounds of ammo for the Federal government?

He caused a months long shortage on the civilian market for all calibers of ammo.

And it is my belief he must have thought about preparing the govt. to go to war on the patriots who were going to stand up for our rights if he succeeded in trying a full blown power grab.

Liberals are NOTORIOUS for not thinking past their imnediate objective.

It is a built in handicap most of them share.

They only think about the problem of stopping random mass shootings.

But those casualty rates would be dwarfed by the numbers of patriots and Liberals who would be killed trying to regain sovereignty of our government (or help the Usurper in Chief) in case a would-be despot tried to take advantage of our disarmed state by seizing all govt power and becoming a dictator.

A terrible war would break out and millions would die.

Liberals cant imagine a guy like Obama trying anything like that. But they can imagine Trump doing it, I'd bet.

But human nature does not change.

The 2nd Amendment is our last line of defense against dictatorship and should never be made less potent to stop random mass shootings unless we would court a much worse destiny brought on by Liberal short sightedness.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

It was one hell of a party wasn't it? I hope you at least got laid and put in as much effort into that as you did this post. Which pretty much means she thought things were going good and then you passed out and drooled on her tits.

 

[leecross]

Oh to be young again.

I remember when I had MY first beer.

You know I’m right.

You have not considered why the 2nd Amendment was created.

How The Second Amendment Prevents Tyranny

The Second Amendment was supposed to protect us from government by dispersing its coercive power among the people. We still adhere to that system today.

By Robert Tracinski

How The Second Amendment Works To Prevent Tyranny

 

[xband]

My gun is like The Rifleman carried. Chambered .45-70 and lever action. I can go deeper into guns but my one lever action is good enough. You never know when a Buffalo jumps through the window and there is a Buffalo Farm only 10 miles south of me

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go?

DO YOU have any idea what a giant pain in the ass it is to legally own a fully automatic weapon ?
And none have been legally sold in the US since 1986 YOU CAN NOT BUY A NEW ONE making the ones that are around pricey as in the 10 grand and up range.those of us who could afford them probably do not need to rob a bank .
I have no problem with people carrying them . THEY should be COMPLETELY legal again and new production should be offered to the general public.

Back in the bad ol days in NYC i carried a 38 snub nose with me everywhere .Thankfully I Never had to use it ..its even been in and out of the empire state building i don't know how many times.I used to do biz with a manufacturer that had offices in the building . I had to stop carrying the city got safer but the laws got super draconian ...if i tried that shit today id be immediately tackled after i hit the security check and THROWN IN JAIL .

pssst DO you know what bernie getzs biggest mistake was ?
he turned himself in!
thats the city and the city has really good police response times BUT once you're out in rural areas police times can run ten /15 /20 minutes
what do ya do in pallokaville USA if someones trying to get through your door ?
YA blow a hole in him

If you want a permit today in NYC ya better be a celebrity, a billionaire ,or someone who knows someone ..if i was in Brooklyn right now i could probably have you looking at a wide variety of semi autos in under an hour ...no paper work needed BUT walk the streets with it at your own risk cause you're now a criminal for trying to exercise your constitutional right .

Today i live down south AND where i live now people open carry their sidearms in the supermarket... gas stations ,everywhere ! unless a sign is posted like at the DMV .NO one flinches or pisses themselves over an inanimate object that cant hurt you .

Where i live now you cant carry without a permit BUT i can own and buy as many guns and rifles as i want WITHOUT A PERMIT AND the castle doctrine extends to my car
meaning i can keep a gun locked in the glove box.

I get where you're coming from. You wanna save the children and if you can save ONE LITTLE AMERICAN LIFE its worth it ...Unless theyre killed by an illegal immigrant then maybe not so much. which is just another democRAT hypocrisy thats not lost on free thinkers

If it makes you feel any better I wouldn't issue this lady a ccp

is lady the proper pro noun in this situation ?
he kinda loses the lady like mystique when he wants to take it out to the parking lot and brawl like a drunk 21 year old suffering from acute " toxic masculinity "
and hes white to ...most definitely a racist

Seriously though I highly encourage the adults in everyones family to properly educate their sons and daughters on the proper and safe use of firearms along with the local and state laws that would apply to them . I totally encourage single young adult women to take some classes & hit the range Because unlike a Hollywood movie a 100 lb female is no match for muscle bound 220 lb man animal with bad intentions .

With a fire arm all of a sudden the 100 lb woman is now equals with a 220 lb animal...gun rights are indeed womens rights .

the real question is why are you a misogynistic sexist who hates women?

in good news for the people the list climbs

South Dakota is the latest state to allow concealed handguns to be carried without a permit
By Joe Sterling, CNN
Updated 2142 GMT (0542 HKT) February 1, 2019
Gov. Kristi Noem addressing lawmakers last month in Pierre, South Dakota.
(CNN)It's now legal to carry a concealed handgun without a permit in South Dakota.
In signing the legislation Thursday, Gov. Kristi Noem made her state the latest to allow the practice. It's the first bill she's signed into law since she took office last month.
The legislation, which will go into effect on July 1, is designed to "protect the Second Amendment rights of South Dakotans by allowing constitutional carry," she said.
"More than 230 years ago, the Founding Fathers of our country penned the Constitution that has since laid the framework for centuries of policies," the Republican governor said.

"They so firmly believed in the importance of the freedom to bear arms that they enshrined it into the Constitution's Second Amendment."
Gov. Kristi Noem signs her first bill into law on Thursday, allowing people to carry concealed pistols without a permit in South Dakota.


Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming also do not require a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

 

[xband]

What fully automatic weapon do you suggest? Tell me an M-16 and I will shoot you down.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

What fully automatic weapon do you suggest? Tell me an M-16 and I will shoot you down.

where ya gonna buy one ?
is it because you're passionately against "gun violence" you'll have to resort to it

a death threat from a tolerant leftist theirs a shocker

 

[Vastator]

No problem with automatics or carrying them. The civilian population should as equitably armed as the soldiers we send to fight war, insofar as firearms are concerned.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Oh to be young again.

I remember when I had MY first beer.

You know I’m right.

You haven't been right since you got here.

 

[Penelope]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

You had a direction to start this OP.

I disagreed with it, but at least you were headed in a viable direction.

Then you lost focus.

Here, maybe this will help.

The more guns, the better.

We can only shoot one at a time, so you are worried about nothing on the number of guns we have.

And you should be glad we have as big and as bad ass weapons as we do.

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

You hate Trump?

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter his ambitions if he woke up and wanted to become King.

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter the ambitions of a President Hillary Clinton if she somehow succeeded in deposing DJT and soon after being sworn in she woke up and wanted to become Queen.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

Tell us when human nature becomes antiquated and out of date.

That is when I will give another moments thought to the 2nd Amendment, which exists to protect us from human nature.

Give some people the power to make us all subjects and they will try to do so.

Obama tried it and all he could manage was politicizing every department of the Federal government.

Just think if there had been no 2A!

Remember when he bought billions and billions of rounds of ammo for the Federal government?

He caused a months long shortage on the civilian market for all calibers of ammo.

And it is my belief he must have thought about preparing the govt. to go to war on the patriots who were going to stand up for our rights if he succeeded in trying a full blown power grab.

Liberals are NOTORIOUS for not thinking past their imnediate objective.

It is a built in handicap most of them share.

They only think about the problem of stopping random mass shootings.

But those casualty rates would be dwarfed by the numbers of patriots and Liberals who would be killed trying to regain sovereignty of our government (or help the Usurper in Chief) in case a would-be despot tried to take advantage of our disarmed state by seizing all govt power and becoming a dictator.

A terrible war would break out and millions would die.

Liberals cant imagine a guy like Obama trying anything like that. But they can imagine Trump doing it, I'd bet.

But human nature does not change.

The 2nd Amendment is our last line of defense against dictatorship and should never be made less potent to stop random mass shootings unless we would court a much worse destiny brought on by Liberal short sightedness.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

You and I consider tyranny differently.

 

[Penelope]

My friend who is a republican, showed me a pic of her grandchild, a 7 year old dressed in fatigues, with a weapon, a rifle. She thought it was cute, I thought it was disgusting.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

You had a direction to start this OP.

I disagreed with it, but at least you were headed in a viable direction.

Then you lost focus.

Here, maybe this will help.

The more guns, the better.

We can only shoot one at a time, so you are worried about nothing on the number of guns we have.

And you should be glad we have as big and as bad ass weapons as we do.

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

You hate Trump?

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter his ambitions if he woke up and wanted to become King.

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter the ambitions of a President Hillary Clinton if she somehow succeeded in deposing DJT and soon after being sworn in she woke up and wanted to become Queen.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

Tell us when human nature becomes antiquated and out of date.

That is when I will give another moments thought to the 2nd Amendment, which exists to protect us from human nature.

Give some people the power to make us all subjects and they will try to do so.

Obama tried it and all he could manage was politicizing every department of the Federal government.

Just think if there had been no 2A!

Remember when he bought billions and billions of rounds of ammo for the Federal government?

He caused a months long shortage on the civilian market for all calibers of ammo.

And it is my belief he must have thought about preparing the govt. to go to war on the patriots who were going to stand up for our rights if he succeeded in trying a full blown power grab.

Liberals are NOTORIOUS for not thinking past their imnediate objective.

It is a built in handicap most of them share.

They only think about the problem of stopping random mass shootings.

But those casualty rates would be dwarfed by the numbers of patriots and Liberals who would be killed trying to regain sovereignty of our government (or help the Usurper in Chief) in case a would-be despot tried to take advantage of our disarmed state by seizing all govt power and becoming a dictator.

A terrible war would break out and millions would die.

Liberals cant imagine a guy like Obama trying anything like that. But they can imagine Trump doing it, I'd bet.

But human nature does not change.

The 2nd Amendment is our last line of defense against dictatorship and should never be made less potent to stop random mass shootings unless we would court a much worse destiny brought on by Liberal short sightedness.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

Wow, an you started out so good. Then you went to hell in a hand basket.

The 2nd amendment does nothing to prevent a Tyranical dictator from taking over the US. Not a damned thing. It became a non issued as of 1917 under the National Guard Act. It was quickly becoming a non issue starting in 1859 when new classes of weapons were being introduced. There were no real weapon advances for about 200 years before then so it was a pretty sure bet that weapons were going to progress slowly. That bet was lost. The Weapons outgrew the first 2/3rds of the 2nd amendment. It now got too expensive for private individuals and even states to afford the weapons to protect the sovereignty of the US. It took a Nation. What the Nation didn't have was the bodies so they took over the State Militias by being able to nationalize them. WWI changed things in spades. We became more deadly than ever before in the history of man or beast in 1914.

So, the more guns the better. Let's take a look at that. We are no more civilized than we were at the end of the Civil war when the Walker Colt and Remington was taken from the battle fields into the civilian population by the discharged troops. You can say that there were many uses for the Revolver but you would be wrong. There was only one real use for it back then. Most people on farms and ranches or even towns owned rifles and shotguns. If you can kill a snake with a revolver, you can also kill it equally dead with a Henry or a Shotgun. But most were terrible shots with the revolver and couldn't hit the side of a barn but were good enough shots with the rifle and shotgun to put meat on the table which they did. More guns happened. In the West, the heavy influx of the revolver brought on other problems. It wasn't just more guns, it was more people with more guns. More guns by themselves if it's a small percentage owning them really isn't much of a problem as long as they are responsible. But when the large percentage has guns, it cause a saturation where the ones that aren't responsible will rise to the top of the cream. Pretty soon, you are having your town shot up, petty argument settled by gun battles, and worse. This is why the West had more gun control than it has today. Not because of the number of guns but the number of people with guns. So your comment about "More Guns" doesn't make a whole lot of sense, now does it.

I did a fast check on your numbers. Newsflash there cupcake: The Military uses a completely different round than the Civilians do. Wow, just how far off the track can you get. I never had trouble buying ammo, ever. Now, if I were to try and buy real live 556 Nato then during certain times I might have trouble when the military does a large fiscal buy. But if I want to buy my Ought 6 or 308 or 223 or any other round, it will be on the shelves for the purchase and asking. This one goes under either the heading of "Really, really bad information received by your handlers" or "Just stop making shit up".

All modern Presidents are stopped from using Federal Troops (even if they call up the National Guards) from over throwing the Congress and SCOTUS. Two things stand in their way. The Constitution of the United States and the Uniform Code of Military Justice which is the Military's version of the COTUS. To date, the only President in modern times that has tried to usurp those two collectively has been Trump. And both times, Trump has been slapped down. Congress slaps but the Military ignores which amounts to the same thing. Trump had ever intention of patrolling the border with armed Federal Troops but he was both slapped and ignored on that one so he came up with his brilliant idea of support. That is ALL the federal troops can do. Under the latest Posse Comitatis Law, the President is severely limited in what he can use Federal Military Forces for on US Soil. It's not like the good old days. So don't put the other Presidents from the 60s and up in the same boat with Trump. He's about as close to a Tyrant as our system can allow. Except our system is designed to reign in the tyrant and it does a pretty good job until the voters finally come to their senses.

 

[22lcidw]

My friend who is a republican, showed me a pic of her grandchild, a 7 year old dressed in fatigues, with a weapon, a rifle. She thought it was cute, I thought it was disgusting.

You should have showed her a picture of a cute 7 year old male child being transgendered and in a dress. That would have evened things up.

 

[mudwhistle]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

Oh really?

The problem with gun control is Socialists always take it too far.......just like they're taking abortion too far.