usmbguest5318
Gold Member
I don't. Is there more that's disturbing than that the man died of unnatural circumstances and merely as a matter of human concern is it sad that he's dead?
Maybe there's something pertaining to the matter that's both important and that I'm missing. Lord knows I've not Googled to find out if that's so. At the moment, what I think is that the politically emasculated and exiled brother of a truculent tyrant died. My condolences.
Do I find upsetting the possibility, even plausibility, that Kim Jong Un may have had his brother assassinated? No. In fact, I have in my mind that that is the least of the atrocities of which that man is capable and that he might consider and act to achieve. That he may have had murdered his brother is, frankly, something of which I hope eases his mind enough that he'll settle down now and stop his sabre rattling and other tantrums.
Maybe there's something pertaining to the matter that's both important and that I'm missing. Lord knows I've not Googled to find out if that's so. At the moment, what I think is that the politically emasculated and exiled brother of a truculent tyrant died. My condolences.
Do I find upsetting the possibility, even plausibility, that Kim Jong Un may have had his brother assassinated? No. In fact, I have in my mind that that is the least of the atrocities of which that man is capable and that he might consider and act to achieve. That he may have had murdered his brother is, frankly, something of which I hope eases his mind enough that he'll settle down now and stop his sabre rattling and other tantrums.