Artevelde
Senior Member
'W's Iraq invasion was illegal by international law and, as those laws and treaties were approved by Congress, was also unconstitutional. 'W' terrorized the world and the American people.
Complete nonsense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
'W's Iraq invasion was illegal by international law and, as those laws and treaties were approved by Congress, was also unconstitutional. 'W' terrorized the world and the American people.
Agreed, the Iraq invasion was complete nonsense. Also, a war crime.
"You're an idiot. Go play with your toys."
Such a devastating repost cannot be resisted. I suppose I must retire from the field in the face of superior intellect.
Oh, but you might look up 'International Law' someday, unless you want to preserve forever those illusions of ideal purity.
Then, you disagree with the President of the UN, as well as all others who have carefully studied the details, on what constitutes international law?
And such an educated person needs to address another individual whom she/he does not even know as 'idiot' because he/she disagrees with said person? What school taught you that in debate?
Sorry, Secretary General Kofi Annan, when pressed by a reporter at the time for a clear answer to the question, reluctantly admitted that the invasion was indeed illegal.
Someone who cannot type or spell should have a bit of tolerance for errors.
"....what constitutes "terrorism" of course is a matter of opinion. "
The Rebels terrorized the British. We don't consider Washington a terrorist leader, and neither do the English today.
Washington formed a regular army with which he engaged the British in regular combat. He didn't send people to blow up London.
"....what constitutes "terrorism" of course is a matter of opinion. "
The Rebels terrorized the British. We don't consider Washington a terrorist leader, and neither do the English today.
Washington formed a regular army with which he engaged the British in regular combat. He didn't send people to blow up London.
No, but the USA send terrorist pirates to raid England and destroy shipping.
And the citizens terrorized loyalists and drove them into loyalist enclaves in the USA (New York for one example) and also drove those people into Canada, too.
Legal authorities in the countries that conducted the illegal invasion agreed, yes. Other democratic countries and friends of the US did not agree.
As for blood-thirsty dictators, how many have various US administrations supported, armed and even put in place?
"Privateering by licensed private ships was and is a recognized form of regular warfare and has nothing to do with terrorism."
A distinction without a difference.
This poster turns the term 'idiot' into a compliment.