ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
The only thing we know about these planets is that they are in the "goldilocks zone". In our own solar system I believe Venus and Mars are in that zone that allows for surface water to collect.
We also know the radius of kepler planets as the transit method measures that as the planet transits the star...Most of the planets I listed in my op are below 1.5 times our radius. There's a lot to learn about them and will take decades or even centuries of research to find out the truth...On this you're 100% right about.
On the otherhand, I wouldn't put Venus in the habitable zone as it receives over twice as much solar flux as the earth!. Kepler-442 is around .66 of our solar flex, k2-72e is around .76 of our solar flex, Kepler 62e is around 1.2 of our solar flex(278k estimated), Kepler 62f is around .42 of our solar flex.
62f is more like mars but much bigger in size as 62f is a super earth, and likely with a thick atmosphere and a hot core for plate movement.
such that Flux(Venus) = 1370 x (1/0.72)2 = 1370 x 1.9 = 2643 W/m2
Venus thus receives almost twice as much solar flux as the Earth.
ATM S 211 - Notes
Extrasolar planets that receive twice the solar flux as earth are normally 320k or higher, which is too hot and if it developed a thick greenhouse atmosphere is probably a hell of a lot hotter.