Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who knows why? Made up stories often have holes in them!Still canāt answer the question I see. Itās ok, I wouldnāt want to answer it if I were you either.LOLItās looking like she will be testifying on Thursday so there goes your theory if that happens. But you still havent answered the question. If this is a made up story to target Kavanaugh then why accuse two boys of the assault? That automatically takes it from one vs one to two vs one and makes her ālieā harder to stick. So why did she say there was two? Direct answer pleaseGladly. First, she was probably assured that the accusation alone would be sufficient to convince Susan Collins to change her vote. Her lawyer stated she had witnesses and that she was eager to appear in front of Congress if necessary. The therapy notes and polygraph claims were thrown in to bolster her attack and figured it would be enough for Collins (maybe a few others) to flip her vote. Collins didn't flip, and now her bluff is being called and she can't back up all those claims. That's why they're coming up with all these demands they know will not be met. They are not planning to let her testify because she is lying, her lawyer is lying, and the Dems have painted themselves into a corner. Makes a lot more sense than your arguing over possible reasons for her inconsistencies. One only has to observe past behavior of the left to recognize this overused tactic of accusing their enemies of sexual misconduct without any substantiation. This is classic leftist character assassination.Thatās what Iām trying to discuss but yāall keep dodging the questions. Letās assume she is making it up. Then try and make sense out of why she implicated two boys, the therapy notes from 6 years ago, the polygraph that she wanted to take and the FBI investigation that she is calling for. Letās take a look at those actions and see how it fits into a meditated plan to push a false accusation
Grassley has warned them that if she does not testifyThat on Monday a vote will be taken to proceed and push it to the senate for a full vote... No more games!
P.S. I don't know if her story was simply made up or not.
Which the Republicans have done and democrats refused to participate in... No why would that be? We have 4 of five testimonies under oath. The only one missing is Fords.....There are 3-5 people to interview. Thatās called vetting. Standard background check.Thereās nothing to vet. No location, no date, no named host - no details whatsoever. And the two men she named in addition to Kav have made statements that they have no recollection whatsoever of the āincidentā.Exactly and this new info could be vetted in a matter of days. Why stop now?Theyāve done background checks - at least 6.The FBI does background checks on Supreme Court nominees. This is just part of that. Why are you so quick to dismiss it?No. Itās not the FBIs job to investigate the activities of minors.
The FBI also does not investigate what minors get up to at parties.
But do continue with your idiocy, itās hilarious.
Grassley has offered to fly the whole committee to fly out and meet with her. So far no response.LOLItās looking like she will be testifying on Thursday so there goes your theory if that happens. But you still havent answered the question. If this is a made up story to target Kavanaugh then why accuse two boys of the assault? That automatically takes it from one vs one to two vs one and makes her ālieā harder to stick. So why did she say there was two? Direct answer pleaseGladly. First, she was probably assured that the accusation alone would be sufficient to convince Susan Collins to change her vote. Her lawyer stated she had witnesses and that she was eager to appear in front of Congress if necessary. The therapy notes and polygraph claims were thrown in to bolster her attack and figured it would be enough for Collins (maybe a few others) to flip her vote. Collins didn't flip, and now her bluff is being called and she can't back up all those claims. That's why they're coming up with all these demands they know will not be met. They are not planning to let her testify because she is lying, her lawyer is lying, and the Dems have painted themselves into a corner. Makes a lot more sense than your arguing over possible reasons for her inconsistencies. One only has to observe past behavior of the left to recognize this overused tactic of accusing their enemies of sexual misconduct without any substantiation. This is classic leftist character assassination.Thatās what Iām trying to discuss but yāall keep dodging the questions. Letās assume she is making it up. Then try and make sense out of why she implicated two boys, the therapy notes from 6 years ago, the polygraph that she wanted to take and the FBI investigation that she is calling for. Letās take a look at those actions and see how it fits into a meditated plan to push a false accusation
Grassley has warned them that if she does not testify on Monday a vote will be taken to proceed and push it to the senate for a full vote... No more games!
She says she can't make it to hearing; because she is afraid of flying. Huh? Lol
I bet if she was to leave by train on Friday...she may get there on Monday just in time. lmao
I donāt know either but if you are going to take a position you should be able to explore the logic behind itWho knows why? Made up stories often have holes in them!Still canāt answer the question I see. Itās ok, I wouldnāt want to answer it if I were you either.LOLItās looking like she will be testifying on Thursday so there goes your theory if that happens. But you still havent answered the question. If this is a made up story to target Kavanaugh then why accuse two boys of the assault? That automatically takes it from one vs one to two vs one and makes her ālieā harder to stick. So why did she say there was two? Direct answer pleaseGladly. First, she was probably assured that the accusation alone would be sufficient to convince Susan Collins to change her vote. Her lawyer stated she had witnesses and that she was eager to appear in front of Congress if necessary. The therapy notes and polygraph claims were thrown in to bolster her attack and figured it would be enough for Collins (maybe a few others) to flip her vote. Collins didn't flip, and now her bluff is being called and she can't back up all those claims. That's why they're coming up with all these demands they know will not be met. They are not planning to let her testify because she is lying, her lawyer is lying, and the Dems have painted themselves into a corner. Makes a lot more sense than your arguing over possible reasons for her inconsistencies. One only has to observe past behavior of the left to recognize this overused tactic of accusing their enemies of sexual misconduct without any substantiation. This is classic leftist character assassination.Thatās what Iām trying to discuss but yāall keep dodging the questions. Letās assume she is making it up. Then try and make sense out of why she implicated two boys, the therapy notes from 6 years ago, the polygraph that she wanted to take and the FBI investigation that she is calling for. Letās take a look at those actions and see how it fits into a meditated plan to push a false accusation
Grassley has warned them that if she does not testifyThat on Monday a vote will be taken to proceed and push it to the senate for a full vote... No more games!
P.S. I don't know if her story was simply made up or not.
There are 4 testimonies? Really? Who?Which the Republicans have done and democrats refused to participate in... No why would that be? We have 4 of five testimonies under oath. The only one missing is Fords.....There are 3-5 people to interview. Thatās called vetting. Standard background check.Thereās nothing to vet. No location, no date, no named host - no details whatsoever. And the two men she named in addition to Kav have made statements that they have no recollection whatsoever of the āincidentā.Exactly and this new info could be vetted in a matter of days. Why stop now?Theyāve done background checks - at least 6.The FBI does background checks on Supreme Court nominees. This is just part of that. Why are you so quick to dismiss it?
The FBI also does not investigate what minors get up to at parties.
But do continue with your idiocy, itās hilarious.
They canāt take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They canāt ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They wonāt supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being playedHow so?The Reps are now playing the political games too
Your either blind, ignorant, or both... The congressional record is your friend...There are 4 testimonies? Really? Who?Which the Republicans have done and democrats refused to participate in... No why would that be? We have 4 of five testimonies under oath. The only one missing is Fords.....There are 3-5 people to interview. Thatās called vetting. Standard background check.Thereās nothing to vet. No location, no date, no named host - no details whatsoever. And the two men she named in addition to Kav have made statements that they have no recollection whatsoever of the āincidentā.Exactly and this new info could be vetted in a matter of days. Why stop now?Theyāve done background checks - at least 6.
The FBI also does not investigate what minors get up to at parties.
But do continue with your idiocy, itās hilarious.
what's the rush by repubs on this now, when they refused to even have a hearing on Obama's supreme court nominee and left the court with only 8 justices for A YEAR?They canāt take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They canāt ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They wonāt supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being playedHow so?The Reps are now playing the political games too
I wonder if she does attend the hearing, she will be wearing her infamous pink Vagina hat. Lol
I am sure the drive-by media wil try to either omit this story (or spin it). LOL
ahhh, he doesn't want to have an FBI investigation because if she ever decides to go the criminal justice route, if state prosecutors determined it was a felony crime, the info gathered by the FBI in their back ground check, can be used against him...
I wonder if she does attend the hearing, she will be wearing her infamous pink Vagina hat. Lol
I am sure the drive-by media wil try to either omit this story (or spin it). LOL
you can always do 'the usual' and photoshop a picture of her with the hat....
They have already postponed the vote for more than a couple of days and have bent over backwards to accommodate the accuser.They canāt take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They canāt ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They wonāt supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being playedHow so?The Reps are now playing the political games too
She lost her chance to go the criminal justice route when she did not report the alleged incident and the SoL expired.ahhh, he doesn't want to have an FBI investigation because if she ever decides to go the criminal justice route, if state prosecutors determined it was a felony crime, the info gathered by the FBI in their back ground check, can be used against him...
They canāt take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They canāt ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They wonāt supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being playedHow so?The Reps are now playing the political games too
They canāt take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They canāt ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They wonāt supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being playedHow so?The Reps are now playing the political games too
They have bent over backwards to accommodate her. They have even offered more than once to travel to her for her testimony since it now appears she doesnāt like to fly.
They have given her five extensions, delayed the whole process, agreed to her demands over the number of cameras and to keep Kav out of the room so he is denied the right to even face his accuser.
There certainly are people playing games, but it isnāt republicans. You really are full of crap.
...Grassley wrote on Twitter that he had "just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed [with] the statement she made last week to testify to the senate."
The GOP chairman didn't specify how long of an extension he is giving Ford, but his announcement kicks the negotiations over a public hearing into at least Saturday.
Grassley wrote on Twitter that Ford "[should] decide so we can move on," adding, "I want to hear her."
He noted the Judiciary Committee had given Ford five extensions to decide if she wanted to meet with the Senate panel. ...
Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u," Grassley added in a tweet....
Grassley extends deadline for Kavanaugh accuser to decide on testifying
