Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by DavidS, Dec 6, 2008.
I know this is a yes or no question, but I want to know why you think the way you do.
In fact I think Bin Laden won the "war on terror."
He sat sipping tea in Pakistan, and while Bush bankrupted America.
How can you get even?
First, even in Laden was actually responsible for it (the possibility that it was someone else is still present) he got a lot more out of us attacking him than we could ever get.
Terror is the rule by fear, attacking someone is another manifestation of fear, therefore we gave him what he wanted. If he wasn't responsible that's a lot of publicity without ever having to lift a finger, so that makes it our own stupidity.
not until Bush and cheney and rumsfield hang..
If murdering 10's of thousands of innocent Muslims was the real goal.
Then yes, we have gotten even.
Lets not forget he (Bush) didn't ask for it nor did he start it. See he started his first 4 years with a heap of shit dropped in his lap and I believe it didn't help the situation we are in today either and probably contributed a great deal.
We should have just dropped a bomb it would have been cheaper and shorter. We aren't liked anyway and no longer feared.
don't be crazy of course he asked for it ever read pnac..I bet they did..and besides bin laden is a old CIA man from way back ..freind of the family as well
Bin laden shot Kennedy didn't he ?
Sheesh ... and this thread turns into yet another win for the terrorists. Bush isn't to blame for 9-11, but he sure was an idiot in handling it. Laden may or may not have caused it, but it was an attack. How do you win against terrorism? The answer is easier than most of you seem to realize, you rebuild, mourn the dead, and move on. Otherwise you are playing into their hands.
Separate names with a comma.