do you approve of chuck schumer ?

do you approve of chuck schumer ??

  • yes

    Votes: 10 25.0%
  • no

    Votes: 30 75.0%

  • Total voters
    40
Chuck "call everything the Republicans say 'extreme'" Schumer?
I don't approve of him. He's a 'filth' fly. New York is full of them, right Charlie Rangel?

Your kidding me, right?

Every other word out of any Republican's mouth these days is "Socialism", and you jackasses are trying to make a federal case out of Schumer's use of "extreme"?

ROFL. Classic.

Liberals think the simple truth is "extreme."

That's not sarcasm. They actually think that.
 
That..had nothing to do with Schumer and everything to do with the "Heartland" minded Conservatives who believe the fly over states should have what amounts to 2 votes per person without paying for it.

You mean libs like Schumer didn't vote for all those welfare programs that you don't want people in the middle of the country to get?

The founding fathers are the ones who decided that each state would have two Senators. It appears you object to the Constitution. Nothing unusual for a lib.
 
schumer is an asshole, so is wasserman schultzie.

i don't like her... my niece does and she says that wasserman is the person she's met that is most likely/qualified to be president. to me she's like pelosi younger.
 
Chuck "call everything the Republicans say 'extreme'" Schumer?
I don't approve of him. He's a 'filth' fly. New York is full of them, right Charlie Rangel?

Your kidding me, right?

Every other word out of any Republican's mouth these days is "Socialism", and you jackasses are trying to make a federal case out of Schumer's use of "extreme"?

ROFL. Classic.

Liberals think the simple truth is "extreme."

That's not sarcasm. They actually think that.

What simple truth?

Obama was born in Kenya?
Democrats are communists?
Tax cuts grow the economy?
BP was subjected to a shake down?
The congress should conduct an investigation to find out who is anti american?
The new Health Care package included death panels?
Americans should be ready to reload?
Shut down decades old and helpful institutions?

Seriously..this is not extremism?
 
That..had nothing to do with Schumer and everything to do with the "Heartland" minded Conservatives who believe the fly over states should have what amounts to 2 votes per person without paying for it.

You mean libs like Schumer didn't vote for all those welfare programs that you don't want people in the middle of the country to get?

The founding fathers are the ones who decided that each state would have two Senators. It appears you object to the Constitution. Nothing unusual for a lib.

Feel free to make some sense.

Really.
 
Schumewr plays games with rhetoric like so many others on both sides of the aisle. He has to go so we can make room for honest representatives for our country.
 
Does it really matter if you approve of him if you don't live in New York?

After all, it's New Yorkers like me he represents. It's not his job to be popular to everyone else.

yeah, but it's a federal post... advise and consent etc... high level power.
don't forget him calling the flight attedent a bitch for doing her job. i think he's the captain of the brown noses and chief principle players on the U.S. spending team
 
I just posted an example. Are you illiterate?

When you call Republicans "extremists" because some Democrat propaganda organ tested the phrase and told you to use, then you're a liar. You're nothing but a filthy despicable propagandist.

There's hardly anything "extreme" about cutting $60 billion from a $4000 billion dollar budget. Obama's deficit spending is over $150/month. So we cut two weeks worth of his deficit spending. That's you and Chucky's conception of "extreme."

Calling Republicans "Extremist" is not an example of "Lying". You need to work on your reasoning skills.

Especially when the Republicans in question have been referring to you as a "Socialist" for years.

And my opinion of "extreme" is not cutting 60 billion dollars.

I'm referring to the Republican's use of the words "Death Panels", Socialism, and Fascism every time someone does something that they disapprove of.

I'm referring to the current stock of Republicans clear desire to gut every government program that they don't like.

I was referring to the Republicans plans to privatize Medicare, that is privatize it for everyone UNDER 55.

And I'm definitely referring to Republicans and Conservative commentators continuous use of the words "revolt" and the occasional use of the word "succession", both of which are terms you specifically DON'T use unless you are an extremist.
 
That..had nothing to do with Schumer and everything to do with the "Heartland" minded Conservatives who believe the fly over states should have what amounts to 2 votes per person without paying for it.

You mean libs like Schumer didn't vote for all those welfare programs that you don't want people in the middle of the country to get?

The founding fathers are the ones who decided that each state would have two Senators. It appears you object to the Constitution. Nothing unusual for a lib.

Feel free to make some sense.

Really.

this makes a lot of sense... shallow. it's a great point that you (libs) only like the constitution after you've imagined in your mind, after contorting it to your liking/approval. this is why we have a supreme court, because of people like you. it's a democrat hallmark.
 
Least he's not telling bold face lies in the halls of Congress.

Dude, you couldn't fill a Volkswagon Beetle with the politicians in congress not telling bold face lies in the halls of Congress

And?

Schumer would be driving that Beetle. What ever else he is..he is not a liar.

He absolutely is a liar. His preposterous statements and constant rewriting of history in Iraq and Afghanistan and constantly shifting positions which magically always serve the interest of the Democratic party over the truth are not only lies but shallow ones. If the media didn't have zero interest in going after Democratic boobs he'd be mocked like Palin. He's a liar and a fool.
 
It is quite clear that the people of New York approve of the performance of Chuck Schumer

If the Republicans are not happy, maybe they can run Carl Palodino against him next time

New York consistently sends among the worst Senators to DC. The only ones I can think of as bad off the top of my head are Illinois, California, Michigan and Maryland.
 
It is quite clear that the people of New York approve of the performance of Chuck Schumer

If the Republicans are not happy, maybe they can run Carl Palodino against him next time

The shiteaters of New York that approve that Piece of Shit are LibTURDS, and LibTURDS are......TURDS.

I don't read any of your posts that don't rhyme with Salami

Do you read any posts? The ones you respond to never indicate you do.
 
It is quite clear that the people of New York approve of the performance of Chuck Schumer

If the Republicans are not happy, maybe they can run Carl Palodino against him next time

And how's NY doing these days? Oh... that's right.

:lol:

Still one of the wealthiest states in the country. How is per capita income in Louisiana?

All relative... taxes are low, cost of living is low, unemployment is low..

And how well can one live on $100k per year in NY? You can live quite well down here.

BTW.. your state is bankrupt and is losing it's wealthier citizens in droves.
 
Last edited:
That..had nothing to do with Schumer and everything to do with the "Heartland" minded Conservatives who believe the fly over states should have what amounts to 2 votes per person without paying for it.

You mean libs like Schumer didn't vote for all those welfare programs that you don't want people in the middle of the country to get?

The founding fathers are the ones who decided that each state would have two Senators. It appears you object to the Constitution. Nothing unusual for a lib.

Object to people in Wyoming getting 4 times the amount of representation as someone in New York and then living off of the money New Yorkers earn??

DAMN RIGHT I object.

The Constitution is not the Bible. It's perfectly acceptable to object to parts of it, if they cause an unfair effect. That's why there are AMENDMENTS.

I regularly advocate that there should be a constitutional convention to rectify the inequality in representation, taxes and funding that currently exists between small and large states, and there's certainly nothing wrong with me doing that. It is my right as a citizen.
 
a great example of arrogance is when the demparty keeps using "extreme" after his soundbite blunder.

it's hard for us to take anything he says as sincere, especially after calling the stewedess a bitch. he's a dick.
 
Last edited:
yeah, but it's a federal post... advise and consent etc... high level power.
don't forget him calling the flight attedent a bitch for doing her job. i think he's the captain of the brown noses and chief principle players on the US Spending team.

The specific job of a Senator or Representative is to represent the interests of their constituents.

That is their job. That's what they're there for.

Even if a Senators constituents are mostly insane, like in Alaska for instance, it is still their job to represent them. That's why you get someone like Ted Stevens.

Oh, and speaking of Alaska, Alaska is certainly the most socialist state in the US. Wealth redistribution runs rampant in Alaska.
 
That..had nothing to do with Schumer and everything to do with the "Heartland" minded Conservatives who believe the fly over states should have what amounts to 2 votes per person without paying for it.

You mean libs like Schumer didn't vote for all those welfare programs that you don't want people in the middle of the country to get?

The founding fathers are the ones who decided that each state would have two Senators. It appears you object to the Constitution. Nothing unusual for a lib.

Object to people in Wyoming getting 4 times the amount of representation as someone in New York and then living off of the money New Yorkers earn??

DAMN RIGHT I object.

The Constitution is not the Bible. It's perfectly acceptable to object to parts of it, if they cause an unfair effect. That's why there are AMENDMENTS.

I regularly advocate that there should be a constitutional convention to rectify the inequality in representation, taxes and funding that currently exists between small and large states, and there's certainly nothing wrong with me doing that. It is my right as a citizen.

Oh palease.
 
He absolutely is a liar. His preposterous statements and constant rewriting of history in Iraq and Afghanistan and constantly shifting positions which magically always serve the interest of the Democratic party over the truth are not only lies but shallow ones. If the media didn't have zero interest in going after Democratic boobs he'd be mocked like Palin. He's a liar and a fool.

Specific examples would be nice.
 
Object to people in Wyoming getting 4 times the amount of representation as someone in New York and then living off of the money New Yorkers earn??

DAMN RIGHT I object.

The Constitution is not the Bible. It's perfectly acceptable to object to parts of it, if they cause an unfair effect. That's why there are AMENDMENTS.

I regularly advocate that there should be a constitutional convention to rectify the inequality in representation, taxes and funding that currently exists between small and large states, and there's certainly nothing wrong with me doing that. It is my right as a citizen.

Oh palease.

"palease" what? Is there some part of my post that is inaccurate?
 

Forum List

Back
Top