Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
im not asking 64 questions, I asked one question which you skirted around. How about a direct answer?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
i literally just said what you said. Did you think you just got me with some novel idea?!That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
ILMAO @ "LITERALLY STILL A PIECE OF THE MOTHER". Um no, it's a human growing inside another human.
Fact is motherfuckers, it's a human being. Human rights only apply as far as progressive spines can handle it. All else to be ignored.
do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
True each human has their own unique DNA which is made up of chromosomes and the DNA from the mother and father. Do you know how a paternity test works? Same question to you MAGAmanwrong the preborn has its own distinct DNA separate from the mother or father it is a unique humanThat’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
True each human has their own unique DNA which is made up of chromosomes and the DNA from the mother and father. Do you know how a paternity test works?wrong the preborn has its own distinct DNA separate from the mother or father it is a unique humanThat’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
So you won’t answer the question either. Interesting.do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
we can start with right to life since its kinda stupid to talk about free speech gun rights and so on at this point,,,
im not asking 64 questions, I asked one question which you skirted around. How about a direct answer?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
Yes, I believe unborn children should have rights. Now the question is what those rights are... I’m asking you if you think they should have the exact same rights as a born human child?
So you won’t answer the question either. Interesting.do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
we can start with right to life since its kinda stupid to talk about free speech gun rights and so on at this point,,,
Haha. If it had the same DNA as the mother then it would literally be the mother. Look up the word “part”. You’re not the sharpest tool in the shed are ya?True each human has their own unique DNA which is made up of chromosomes and the DNA from the mother and father. Do you know how a paternity test works?wrong the preborn has its own distinct DNA separate from the mother or father it is a unique humanThat’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
again that debunks your claim it is part of the mother,,,cause if it was it would have the same DNA,,,
Haha. If it had the same DNA as the mother then it would literally be the mother. Look up the word “part”. You’re not the sharpest tool in the shed are ya?True each human has their own unique DNA which is made up of chromosomes and the DNA from the mother and father. Do you know how a paternity test works?wrong the preborn has its own distinct DNA separate from the mother or father it is a unique humanThat’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
again that debunks your claim it is part of the mother,,,cause if it was it would have the same DNA,,,
Personally, I understand both sides of the issue. I dont bash the pro lifers.K9, should raped women be forced to have their baby?
Yes.
No you didn’t. I asked a yes or no question. Is your answer yes or no?So you won’t answer the question either. Interesting.do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
we can start with right to life since its kinda stupid to talk about free speech gun rights and so on at this point,,,
I did answer it,,,
There are brown and yellow people too!So you're one of those the world is black and white and only black and white kind of peopleUntil they leave the body, I support a womans right to choose.I don't consider the unborn a person. So no.
So you agree that it's fine to kill them at 9 months, 5 minutes before leaving the womb. Stay downwind of me.
I dont support the practice of abortion but I dont support forced gestation either.
Your concession is accepted. Thanks for playingHaha. If it had the same DNA as the mother then it would literally be the mother. Look up the word “part”. You’re not the sharpest tool in the shed are ya?True each human has their own unique DNA which is made up of chromosomes and the DNA from the mother and father. Do you know how a paternity test works?wrong the preborn has its own distinct DNA separate from the mother or father it is a unique humanThat’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
again that debunks your claim it is part of the mother,,,cause if it was it would have the same DNA,,,
you are one sad individual,,,
i just don’t understand why you won’t say they they should have the exact same rights as a born child. Wouldn’t that make everything much simpler?im not asking 64 questions, I asked one question which you skirted around. How about a direct answer?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?That’s a good question. A pre-born human is literally still a piece of the mother, growing inside her body. That is the obvious grey area.
what are your thoughts? Should preborn humans have the exact same rights and born humans?
They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
Yes, I believe unborn children should have rights. Now the question is what those rights are... I’m asking you if you think they should have the exact same rights as a born human child?
I think they should have the right to be born healthy and then be adopted to someone who will raise them. Aside from that, what other needs would do they have that would warrant additional "rights"?
No you didn’t. I asked a yes or no question. Is your answer yes or no?So you won’t answer the question either. Interesting.do they have the same rights as born human children? Or just the right to life?they have a right to life just like all other humans,,,
we can start with right to life since its kinda stupid to talk about free speech gun rights and so on at this point,,,
I did answer it,,,
Should an unborn child get the exact same rights as a born child?
notice how I’ve had to write out this question 5 times now because you turds can’t give a direct answer? It’s like working with preschoolers here.
Not in my opinion.I don't consider the unborn a person. So no.
So one second before birth the fetus is not a person?
i just don’t understand why you won’t say they they should have the exact same rights as a born child. Wouldn’t that make everything much simpler?im not asking 64 questions, I asked one question which you skirted around. How about a direct answer?that wasn’t my question though. Should they have the exact same rights as a born child?They should have the right to be born and live their lives.
We're not playing 64 questions. The topic of the thread is whether or not unborn humans should have any rights. Answer that and then we can go from there.
Yes, I believe unborn children should have rights. Now the question is what those rights are... I’m asking you if you think they should have the exact same rights as a born human child?
I think they should have the right to be born healthy and then be adopted to someone who will raise them. Aside from that, what other needs would do they have that would warrant additional "rights"?
