Do we have the military might to go to war with Iran?

So you SUPPORT the US leaving Israel alone if they nuke Iran? How about if Iran when attacked by Israel retaliates against the US and tries to close the straights. is it our problem then? What if they give a nuke to a terror organization or launch nukes at their neighbors?
Israel is the biggest problem in the Middle East.

Cut our ties and treaties with that rogue nation.

And 90% of our Middle East problems will disappear. :cool:


AAWW... i feel so bad for all of those muslim countries who have their panties in a bunch becasue of a ...:eek:... the horror...a jewish nation.

99% of the problem is their intolerance of anything not muslim.


From a purley objective budgetary stance, for what we've invested in them since '48 , we could have bought the Isrealis their own country by now

~S~
 
Obama just cut the military. Now war with Iran is becoming more and more of a possibility.

We have the capability to invade and occupy Iran and almost any other county in the world with the exception of China and Russia. But a war with Iran would not be an outright invasion. We may land limited troops in hit and run operations but no outright invasion is in the works.
You misunderstand the concept of 'invasion' Iran like other countries is a soverign nation. By our landing of troops even 'limited trops in hit and run ops' is an invasion and is grounds for retaliation. You are also misguided in your concept of our 'having the capability to invade and occupy Iran and almost any other nation". We have the capability to invade but the concept of 'occupying
is doubtful especially over the long haul (90 days +).
That is the essential problem. Unless we are willing to run Iran the way we ran Germany and Japan any occupation will be bloody and pointless. The modern American is not prepared for the kind of housecleaning that would require.

Militarily, it would probably be a lot harder slog than Iraq. There is more popular support. But the military is not the issue. Running the place for a long time and then supervising the place for 70 years is just plain no longer to our taste.
 
What does the right wing always look for someone to go to war with? Look at all the wars they start right here at home. Can't they just grow up?

Hey rdean, go back and find your 10th grade history books and see who started most of our wars.......
Do let us know what you find out.......

Conservatives.


Democrat Woodrow Wilson Got us into WW1
Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt Started us in WW2
Democrat Harry Truman sent troops to Korea, and Republican Dwight Eisenhower finished that conflict.
Democrats John F. Kennedy sent troops to Vietnam,
Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson continued and enlarged it and Republican Richard Nixon ended it.
Republican George Bush Sr. sent troops to Kuwait and Iraq (Desert Storm)
Republican George Bush Jr. sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now when will rdean ever tell the truth?
 
So you SUPPORT the US leaving Israel alone if they nuke Iran? How about if Iran when attacked by Israel retaliates against the US and tries to close the straights. is it our problem then? What if they give a nuke to a terror organization or launch nukes at their neighbors?
Israel is the biggest problem in the Middle East.

Cut our ties and treaties with that rogue nation.

And 90% of our Middle East problems will disappear. :cool:
Judeo Christians total 88% in the United States. A Jewish man, Mr. Solomon, solicited and retrieved 95% of the funding for the Revolutionary War, which we won largely due to his dedication in giving the Continental Congress financial clout and provisions for the American Revolutionary Army under General George Washington. Demographics

It just ain't gonna happen, Sunni Man. We are Americans, and we are who we are.
 
Last edited:
So you SUPPORT the US leaving Israel alone if they nuke Iran? How about if Iran when attacked by Israel retaliates against the US and tries to close the straights. is it our problem then? What if they give a nuke to a terror organization or launch nukes at their neighbors?
Israel is the biggest problem in the Middle East.

Cut our ties and treaties with that rogue nation.

And 90% of our Middle East problems will disappear. :cool:
Judeo Christians total 88% in the United States. A Jewish man, Mr. Solomon, solicited and retrieved 95% of the funding for the Revolutionary War, which we won largely due to his dedication in giving the Continental Congress financial clout and provisions for the American Revolutionary Army under General George Washington.

It just ain't gonna happen, Sunni Man. We are Americans, and we are who we are.
AND Who are YOU actually,I know you have been at WAR with someone, since the end of the American Civil War.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!theliq
 
Israel is the biggest proDemographics of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediablem in the Middle East.

Cut our ties and treaties with that rogue nation.

And 90% of our Middle East problems will disappear. :cool:
Judeo Christians total 88% in the United States. A Jewish man, Mr. Solomon, solicited and retrieved 95% of the funding for the Revolutionary War, which we won largely due to his dedication in giving the Continental Congress financial clout and provisions for the American Revolutionary Army under General George Washington. Demographics

It just ain't gonna happen, Sunni Man. We are Americans, and we are who we are.
AND Who are YOU actually,I know you have been at WAR with someone, since the end of the American Civil War.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!theliq
And who wants to know?
 
Judeo Christians total 88% in the United States. A Jewish man, Mr. Solomon, solicited and retrieved 95% of the funding for the Revolutionary War, which we won largely due to his dedication in giving the Continental Congress financial clout and provisions for the American Revolutionary Army under General George Washington. Demographics

It just ain't gonna happen, Sunni Man. We are Americans, and we are who we are.
AND Who are YOU actually,I know you have been at WAR with someone, since the end of the American Civil War.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!theliq
And who wants to know?
I DO.........you say "we are who we are " MEANING ????theliq
 
Have Israel ever confirmed that they have nuclear weapons?
 
Obama just cut the military. Now war with Iran is becoming more and more of a possibility.

Yes, and then some.

Problem is the bean counters.

war is expensive, especially when you are counting every penny. So we half-ass it instead of going in to overwhelm. which ends up costing more in the long run.
 
http://www.usmessageboard.com/milit...might-to-go-to-war-with-iran.html#post4765211
http://www.usmessageboard.com/milit...might-to-go-to-war-with-iran.html#post4765211
http://www.usmessageboard.com/milit...might-to-go-to-war-with-iran.html#post4765211

:lol: You're kidding, right?

:doubt:
Obama just cut the military. Now war with Iran is becoming more and more of a possibility.

I think we'd prevail.

us_vs_world.gif


See Iran there anywhere in the above piechart?

No?

That because Iran's defence budget it too small to even make the chart
 
Thats a riduulous question on its face - when wewon 2 worldwars - andwerean underdogg to the SovietUnion formuch ofthecold war.......................................
 
Obama just cut the military. Now war with Iran is becoming more and more of a possibility.

We have the capability to invade and occupy Iran and almost any other county in the world with the exception of China and Russia. But a war with Iran would not be an outright invasion. We may land limited troops in hit and run operations but no outright invasion is in the works.

We could propbably occupy Russia since they have a a shrinking population.
 
Obama just cut the military. Now war with Iran is becoming more and more of a possibility.

We have the capability to invade and occupy Iran and almost any other county in the world with the exception of China and Russia. But a war with Iran would not be an outright invasion. We may land limited troops in hit and run operations but no outright invasion is in the works.
You misunderstand the concept of 'invasion' Iran like other countries is a soverign nation. By our landing of troops even 'limited trops in hit and run ops' is an invasion and is grounds for retaliation. You are also misguided in your concept of our 'having the capability to invade and occupy Iran and almost any other nation". We have the capability to invade but the concept of 'occupying
is doubtful especially over the long haul (90 days +).

The insertion of Spec ops in limited incursions usually is viewed as a hostile act but not something I would term as an invasion. The Mexican army accidentally crossed the border last year into the US, was it an invasion? We send Spec Ops into Pakistan, are we invading them? What is the threshold between an incursion or an invasion, or is there one?

Of course we would not be inserting troops if hostile action was not imminent or taking place so retaliation is a moot point since at this point we would be in a shooting war.

As to occupation, we can occupy the country but subduing the country is another matter. We could, if we desired, flood Afghanistan with troops and pretty well pacify it but the cost is too prohibitive in terms of funding to do so.
 
If we go to war with Iran I would rather us just fuckin destroy it, none of this occupation, win hearts and minds bullshit anymore.
 

Forum List

Back
Top