CDZ Do some ethnic groups correlate with per capita income?

[grbb]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

 

[usmbguest5318]

LMGTFY

 

[Toronado3800]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

 

[oldsoul]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I believe it has little to do with ethnicity, and A LOT to do with education, and culture. I think that is where you should start with your research. I've provided some links to sites to get you started:

Income Inequality | Pew Research Center
Income and Wealth Inequality - Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality
Income Inequality

 

[Circe]

Who is this thread against, blacks or Chinese?

 

[jillian]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I believe it has little to do with ethnicity, and A LOT to do with education, and culture. I think that is where you should start with your research. I've provided some links to sites to get you started:

Income Inequality | Pew Research Center
Income and Wealth Inequality - Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality
Income Inequality

you left out the results of imperialism in African nations.

 

[harmonica]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

 

[Toronado3800]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

 

[harmonica]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

 

[Toronado3800]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

 

[harmonica]

Some said that african countries with more whites have higher per capita income.

Another said that Asean countries with more chinese have higher percapita income.

For example, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have higher, high, and medium percapita income.

Their chinese population is also highest at Singapore, Malaysia. Indonesia have the lowest ethnic chinese.

Is this true?

Any table?

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

 

[Toronado3800]

I'll trust your ability to look up the math.

These things go in cycles. Some centuries white people are on top of the pole. In the year 1000AD I wouldn't want to have lived in much of central Europe, I'd want to be North African.

The year 032AD, and several hundred years around it put me in Rome or probably better yet Greece even under Roman law!

The year 900, I think I'd want to be in China or the Middle East if I could live with Islam.

Last few hundred years some Western European country and or parts of Asia for the last century.

Little bit of random luck, geography and military happenings the way I see it. Look at the rise and fall of Chinese and Japanese empires. It isn't like they get suddenly smarter or stupider.

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

 

[harmonica]

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

 

[harmonica]

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

4 FARMING PROBLEMS IN AFRICA

 

[harmonica]

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

highest illiteracy

highest poverty

safe drinking water

etc

 

[Toronado3800]

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

Germany was a world power for like a decade after failed Reganomics like plans of deficit military spending and racism. Each time it was left looking like above and unable to feed itself despite having a considerably better climate than Ethiopia.

We were there handing out food. Look up the unit histories.

 

[harmonica]

I don't think sub-Saharan Africa is in the cycle at any time

And neither are Central or South America though that may be more because of my Eurocentric knowledge of history.

Did you have a greater point about sub-Saharan Africa? Don't be shy and hide between the lines.

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.

This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

malnutrition

 

[harmonica]

my point should be obvious --sub S Africa income has not been the best
no real cycles in sub-S Africa as in high to low ..no where near the top of the pole

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.


This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

Germany was a world power for like a decade after failed Reganomics like plans of deficit military spending and racism. Each time it was left looking like above and unable to feed itself despite having a considerably better climate than Ethiopia.

We were there handing out food. Look up the unit histories.

Germany is DE.....
Germany is one of the top economies in the world
please name a Sub-Saharan country that comes even near Germany

 

[Toronado3800]

I guess them and Germany share something then

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.


This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

Germany was a world power for like a decade after failed Reganomics like plans of deficit military spending and racism. Each time it was left looking like above and unable to feed itself despite having a considerably better climate than Ethiopia.

We were there handing out food. Look up the unit histories.

Germany is DE.....
Germany is one of the top economies in the world
please name a Sub-Saharan country that comes even near Germany

Oh, I'm not saying your maps are wrong and I don't want to waste your time hunting down links to facts we agree on. I'm just saying you need to look at why things are the way they are.

Pretty much at the end of the biggest German "Empire", er "uprising" I can think of we were defending 1/2 of the former Germany from the Russians who were more than capable of turning it into their toy farmland. Then we built it into a showcase of capitalism with our tax money and all the money Elvis spent while in the service.

Germany stopped existing. They were helpless without food or allies but they proved useful to us and the British while Stalin the monster couldn't bring himself to exterminate his half of them.

 

[harmonica]

them?? what them??
no, Germany is way above Africa
Africans can't even feed themselves
please, let's not be ridiculous

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.


This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

Germany was a world power for like a decade after failed Reganomics like plans of deficit military spending and racism. Each time it was left looking like above and unable to feed itself despite having a considerably better climate than Ethiopia.

We were there handing out food. Look up the unit histories.

Germany is DE.....
Germany is one of the top economies in the world
please name a Sub-Saharan country that comes even near Germany

Oh, I'm not saying your maps are wrong and I don't want to waste your time hunting down links to facts we agree on. I'm just saying you need to look at why things are the way they are.

Pretty much at the end of the biggest German "Empire", er "uprising" I can think of we were defending 1/2 of the former Germany from the Russians who were more than capable of turning it into their toy farmland. Then we built it into a showcase of capitalism with our tax money and all the money Elvis spent while in the service.

Germany stopped existing. They were helpless without food or allies but they proved useful to us and the British while Stalin the monster couldn't bring himself to exterminate his half of them.

and look at them now

 

[Toronado3800]

No doubt. Germany benefits from the Marshall Plan though. Gotta prop up the failed attempt at a world power so socialism looks bad, ya know.


This is what I think of when I think of Germany's ability to feed itself.

Germany was a world power long before the Marshall Plan
Germany was an industrial power and Africa STILL can't feed itself in the 21st century
this isn't even close
Germany had a major navy/army/industry--while Africa was still had no electricity
stop the nonsensical crap

Germany was a world power for like a decade after failed Reganomics like plans of deficit military spending and racism. Each time it was left looking like above and unable to feed itself despite having a considerably better climate than Ethiopia.

We were there handing out food. Look up the unit histories.

Germany is DE.....
Germany is one of the top economies in the world
please name a Sub-Saharan country that comes even near Germany

Oh, I'm not saying your maps are wrong and I don't want to waste your time hunting down links to facts we agree on. I'm just saying you need to look at why things are the way they are.

Pretty much at the end of the biggest German "Empire", er "uprising" I can think of we were defending 1/2 of the former Germany from the Russians who were more than capable of turning it into their toy farmland. Then we built it into a showcase of capitalism with our tax money and all the money Elvis spent while in the service.

Germany stopped existing. They were helpless without food or allies but they proved useful to us and the British while Stalin the monster couldn't bring himself to exterminate his half of them.

and look at them now

I think we have found common ground then.

We, the United Mutts of America, built a capitalist beacon out of Germany.