Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
They are science you fool
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Our genes may determine how we react to certain things, but they can not determine what we experience.
Maybe you dont understand what this science is saying.
Predisposition to a trait that IS influenced by experience.
The insecure child sees the world as a threat.
The conservatives see the world as a threat.
The outgoing child has MORE diverse experiences with more people.
They see the other guys point of view as a non threat.
Interesting hypothesis.
What of the Liberal who feels threatened by the Tea Partier?
Maybe you dont understand what this science is saying.
Predisposition to a trait that IS influenced by experience.
The insecure child sees the world as a threat.
The conservatives see the world as a threat.
The outgoing child has MORE diverse experiences with more people.
They see the other guys point of view as a non threat.
Interesting hypothesis.
What of the Liberal who feels threatened by the Tea Partier?
A figment of your imagination.
If our genes determine everything, then we determine nothing.
They are science you fool
Maybe you dont understand what this science is saying.
Predisposition to a trait that IS influenced by experience.
The insecure child sees the world as a threat.
The conservatives see the world as a threat.
The outgoing child has MORE diverse experiences with more people.
They see the other guys point of view as a non threat.
Interesting hypothesis.
What of the Liberal who feels threatened by the Tea Partier?
A figment of your imagination.
Our genes may determine how we react to certain things, but they can not determine what we experience.
Maybe you dont understand what this science is saying.
Predisposition to a trait that IS influenced by experience.
The insecure child sees the world as a threat.
The conservatives see the world as a threat.
The outgoing child has MORE diverse experiences with more people.
They see the other guys point of view as a non threat.
I'm the socialite conservative. The wife is the loner liberal.
Our genes may determine how we react to certain things, but they can not determine what we experience.
Maybe you dont understand what this science is saying.
Predisposition to a trait that IS influenced by experience.
The insecure child sees the world as a threat.
The conservatives see the world as a threat.
The outgoing child has MORE diverse experiences with more people.
They see the other guys point of view as a non threat.
Makes sense to me.
I'm the socialite conservative. The wife is the loner liberal.
Please understand what this science is correlating.
Its not saying things are black and white ( yet another conservative trait)
I'm the socialite conservative. The wife is the loner liberal.
Please understand what this science is correlating.
Its not saying things are black and white ( yet another conservative trait)
Do you make it a habit to be self-contradictory?
Please understand what this science is correlating.
Its not saying things are black and white ( yet another conservative trait)
Do you make it a habit to be self-contradictory?
Tell me what part of this confuses you and Ill explain it to you.
Please understand what this science is correlating.
Its not saying things are black and white ( yet another conservative trait)
Do you make it a habit to be self-contradictory?
Tell me what part of this confuses you and Ill explain it to you.
Do you make it a habit to be self-contradictory?
Tell me what part of this confuses you and Ill explain it to you.
In one breathe you condemn black & white logic, yet you paint conservatives with a single, broad brush-stroke.
Tell me what part of this confuses you and Ill explain it to you.
In one breathe you condemn black & white logic, yet you paint conservatives with a single, broad brush-stroke.
Here let me explain it too you.
Stating the study does not claim a black and white means they are not claiming the trait is universally observed.
That statement NO WHERE condems black and white thinking.
You see you viewed what I was saying in black and white terms.
You failed to read correctly what was actually said and saw it only as a means to find a way to attack me personally.
Threatened in what way?Interesting hypothesis.
What of the Liberal who feels threatened by the Tea Partier?
Then why did you piull so many things right out of your ass about what I actually said?