Do conspiracy theorists have a mental disorder?

?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 55.2%
  • No

    Votes: 10 34.5%
  • This is just a plot to shut them up!

    Votes: 3 10.3%

  • Total voters
    29
People believe in conspiracy theories because the truth "is either too simple or too remote," says sociologist Clifton Bryant of Virginia Tech University, who has made a study of "deviant logic" and behavior.

"We're always ready to believe something about which we know nothing,"
 
Of course the conspiracy theorists tend to have mental imbalances.

Just look at the sub-moronic, filthy, vile, ignorant, mindless, baseless, fantasy crap constantly spewed by shitheads like id-eots, or Christophera or 9/11 Rimjob or that dick-muncher Mr. Jones.

It is one thing to recognize that conspiracies DO by definition exist in the world.

It is quite another thing to so warmly embrace these half-baked nut-job lunatic notions.

All 9/11 Twoofers are mentally imbalanced and sordid cock-sucking assholes.

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center.
Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center
]." AE911Truth.org

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report




Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:

There is not a single solitary credible speck of evidence that any explosives (other than the jet fuel) was used.

Twoofers remain rabid asshole scumbag morons.
 
If having less and less trust in governance is a mental disorder, then the phramacabal is going to do a stroke of biz here

Distrusting government is an American tradition. Believing our own government continually and repeatedly conspires to do harm against the American people is ridiculous for many reasons. The main one being that our government is composed of American people who would bitch at the first sign of a "conspiracy".
 
If having less and less trust in governance is a mental disorder, then the phramacabal is going to do a stroke of biz here

Distrusting government is an American tradition. Believing our own government continually and repeatedly conspires to do harm against the American people is ridiculous for many reasons. The main one being that our government is composed of American people who would bitch at the first sign of a "conspiracy".

When you post using fair-minded (and rather obvious) logic, you lose folks like sparky.
 
People believe in conspiracy theories because the truth "is either too simple or too remote," says sociologist Clifton Bryant of Virginia Tech University, who has made a study of "deviant logic" and behavior.

"We're always ready to believe something about which we know nothing,"
Fits the NIST and OCT believers to a T.

The 9/11 truth critics have nothing but ad hominem arguments.
Both sides of the issue have conspiracy theories.
9-11 was a conspiracy whether a person believes that it was an inside job or that a handful of Arabs outwitted the entire intelligence apparatus of the Western world and the operational response of NORAD and the US Air Force.
For one side to call the other conspiracy theorists is the pot calling the kettle black.

The 9/11 Truth movement was not created by bloggers ranting on their web sites. It was created by professional architects and engineers some of whom are known for having designed steel high rise buildings.

It was created by US Air Force pilots and commercial airline pilots who are expert at flying airplanes.

The professionals and the scientists are speaking from the basis of years of experience and expert knowledge. Moreover, the scientists are speaking from the basis of careful research into the evidence that exists.
When a physicist proves that Building 7 (the stories not obscured by other buildings) fell at free fall speed and NIST has to acknowledge that he is correct, you can bet your life that the physicist is correct.

When the architects, engineers, and scientists speak, they offer no theory of who is responsible for 9-11. They state that the known evidence supports neither the NIST reports nor the 9-11 Commission Report. They say that the explanation that the government has provided is demonstrably wrong and that an investigation is required if we are to discover the truth about the event.

It is not a conspiracy theory to examine the evidence and to state that the evidence does not support the explanation that has been given.

On the one hand there are credentialed experts who demonstrate problems in the official account, and on the other hand there are non-experts who denounce the experts as conspiracy kooks.
The experts are cautious and careful about what they say, and their detractors have thrown caution and care to the wind. That is the state of the debate.
The "Critics" of 9/11 Truth. Do They Have a Case?

That is the position of the 9-11 Truth movement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top