Do all white supremacists use Roman historical figures and Norse mytholigical figures

The Coliseum still stands, even after 1,500 years of neglect by the RCC.

To give you a sense of scale

Washington-square-park-arch.jpg


That's the arch at Washington Square Park in NYC.

Make a 4 concentric rings around the park of 60 of those, then build 5 arches high

Coliseum.jpg

And not a single one of your ancestors was involved in accomplishing that feat, interloper. :lol::lol:


I wouldn't be so sure about that.

Rome was a very international empire.

They did not descriminate against making slaves (or for that matter citzens of Rome) of any people regardless of race, religion, creed or place of origin.

Rome was quite liberal in that respect.

And was posibbly the most diverse empire to have existed in history. But then again the world at that time was far more diverse than we could possibly imagine in comparisson to the world today.
 
But what about the white supremacists of Germanic descent? Rome never conquered the Germanic peoples...

They conquered some of them but the Romans possibly didn't know the entire extent of the Germanic world of that time, nor did they really want to conquer them all anyways. They preferred to trade with them and use them as buffer entities and mercenaries.
 
For the most part, the Germanic peoples later swept in and done in what was left of the Roman Empire.
 
For the most part, the Germanic peoples later swept in and done in what was left of the Roman Empire.

That statment shows that you actually know nothing of the Roman Empire.

The Germanic tribes and the Roman Empire had centuries of interactions. The elite of both societies weren't any different.
 
They also claim the greatness of ancient Greece....

And why don't they claim the Russian Czars and stuff? They were white. They kicked ass...
 
So you are a white supremacist?

I thought one of their tenets was to hate Jews.

You don't see to many white supremacists with screen names like "Ivan the terrible" either... "Vlad the impaler," Brian Boru... all white guys...




You have to actually read books to know who those folks were.
 
As for the Norse mythology Nazim in general was hostile to christianty, and several leading Nazi's saw the old norse pagan religons as an accetpable substitute. One can look at how the SS operated, utilizing multiple norse symbols in thier various ceremonies to see the path they expected to take.

Nazis weren't "hostile" to Christainity. They do what all cultures that embrace that religion do..mix and match with their own myth. The Romans did it. The Africans did it. The Hispanics did it. The Asians did it. Why are somehow the Germans different?




Ummmm yes, they were.

"The purpose of the National Socialism fight against Christianity is the same: the total destruction of the last and most deep-rooted support of the forces of conservation. The destruction of the spirit of Christianity in Germany is certainly more far-reaching than appears on the surface...Such vestiges of living Christianity as remain are steadily degenerating in the direction of a superficial and unthinking deism" and that ultimate goal as "...the total abolition of Christianity, which is not a mere philosophical fad of the National Socialists but an iron necessity of their system." ....Rauschning


"Christianity was incapable of uniting the Germans, and that only an entirely new world-theory was capable of doing so."....Hitler


"The question of the divinity of Christ is ridiculous and inessential. A new answer has arisen as to what Christ and Christianity are: Adolph Hitler."....February 1937 Hanns Kerrl, Minister of Religion in the Third Reich

University students in Kiel wrote in 1935 "We Germans are heathens and want no more Jewish religion in our Germany. We no longer believe in the Holy Ghost; we believe in the Holy Blood."

Nordland, a Nazi magazine, called the Sermon on the Mount "the first Bolshevist manifesto." The principle of the National Socialist state, Hitler told an audience in 1937, was "not in Christianity nor in social theory but in the unified people's community," and the same year Himmler banned all Confessing Church seminaries and instruction and he closed all private religious schools two years later.

I can go on and on if you like but this should give you a little idea of how the Nazis viewed religion in general.
 
That's what Alaric and his crew thought when they rolled into the imperial city.

Well Rome was on it's way down after Constantine..really.

But a 500 year run..and technology that rivals some of what we have today..isn't to shabby.

Not too shabby if you happen to fancy imperialistic powers that conquer, pillage, enslave and get their jollies by watching people get butchered in arenas.

Like Israel?

I don't fancy it by choice. My government MAKES me support them.
 
white supremacists tend to worship a semetic god.

Fake ass ones do.

But I have always wondered why some do though. I'm like "You hate Jews, but why worship one and belong to a Jewish cult that became it's own religion ? "

Best answer to that is probably "because it just got to be a habit for us."

Christianity did in fact arise from a Jewish cult.

Within white nationalism, it's a hot and heavy debate: is Christianity good for whites, or bad? The "bad" set points out that turn the other cheek is a way dumb approach for someone trying to defend himself, and Christianity preaches that. The "good" set points out that white gentiles adapted Christianity to their own ways, beefed it up a little and made it less wimpy. Read "The Germanization of Medieval Christianity" for a take on this.

Lots of white nationalists attack Christianity and prefer Nordic, Germanic, pagan, etc. spirituality. William Pierce of the National Alliance is a good example. Alex Linder is a white nationalist who loves to mock Christianity.

One who defends it is David Duke. He says "There's only one religion for the white man, and that is the religion of Jesus Christ." And of course you have some groups like Christian Identity and Church of Jesus Christ - Christian that are openly white nationalist and Christian. It is Christian belief that spurs men on to fight, truth be told. Look at the Crusades.

Who knows. Personally, I don't think any white man hoping to rise to prominence in the defense of his people will get far by bashing Christianity. Millions upon millions of conservative, racially conscious whites are practicing Christians. You cannot turn them off -- they associate anti-Christianity with liberals, Hollywood, Jews, academia, the media, etc.

Me, I have recently started attending church after many years. I see NO CONFLICT between defending my people and being a believer. I have ALWAYS believed in God, and I find it very hard to believe that He would want the white race to be killed off by other races. Very hard to believe.

In fact, I believe that God calls me to defend my race. And God, does it ever need defending.
 
Last edited:
But what about the white supremacists of Germanic descent? Rome never conquered the Germanic peoples...

The Roman Empire held parts of what is considered Germany, today.

Having traveled around Europe, I was pretty amazed with how far the Empire went..
 
white supremacists tend to worship a semetic god.

Fake ass ones do.

But I have always wondered why some do though. I'm like "You hate Jews, but why worship one and belong to a Jewish cult that became it's own religion ? "

Best answer to that is probably "because it just got to be a habit for us."

Christianity did in fact arise from a Jewish cult.

Within white nationalism, it's a hot and heavy debate: is Christianity good for whites, or bad? The "bad" set points out that turn the other cheek is a way dumb approach for someone trying to defend himself, and Christianity preaches that. The "good" set points out that white gentiles adapted Christianity to their own ways, beefed it up a little and made it less wimpy. Read "The Germanization of Medieval Christianity" for a take on this.

Lots of white nationalists attack Christianity and prefer Nordic, Germanic, pagan, etc. spirituality. William Pierce of the National Alliance is a good example. Alex Linder is a white nationalist who loves to mock Christianity.

One who defends it is David Duke. He says "There's only one religion for the white man, and that is the religion of Jesus Christ." And of course you have some groups like Christian Identity and Church of Jesus Christ - Christian that are openly white nationalist and Christian. It is Christian belief that spurs men on to fight, truth be told. Look at the Crusades.

Who knows. Personally, I don't think any white man hoping to rise to prominence in the defense of his people will get far by bashing Christianity. Millions upon millions of conservative, racially conscious whites are practicing Christians. You cannot turn them off -- they associate anti-Christianity with liberals, Hollywood, Jews, academia, the media, etc.

Me, I have recently started attending church after many years. I see NO CONFLICT between defending my people and being a believer. I have ALWAYS believed in God, and I find it very hard to believe that He would want the white race to be killed off by other races. Very hard to believe.

In fact, I believe that God calls me to defend my race. And God, does it ever need defending.

If God loved your race so much above all others, why wouldn't He have just made everyone white?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top