DNA database innocents win landmark European court

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Angel Heart, Dec 5, 2008.

  1. Angel Heart
    Offline

    Angel Heart Conservative Hippie

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,057
    Thanks Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Ratings:
    +341
    DNA database innocents win landmark European court ruling - Telegraph

     
  2. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    I would rather have my DNA stay in record even after being proven innocent for one reason: It would still be able to prove my innocence in the future. Just depends on how they tag it I guess.
     
  3. strollingbones
    Offline

    strollingbones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,657
    Thanks Received:
    15,627
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    chicken farm
    Ratings:
    +31,973
    but dna can be taken over and over...this is a quandry...one one hand i support the privacy of an individual...on the other hand i could see dna leading to the person who took a kid...dna is nearly always left behind even when you simply kidnap a kid...so if it stopped that and helped solve rapes why not keep a dna bank, is it not similar to finger printing?
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,599
    Thanks Received:
    5,914
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,031
    I would, as a responsible member of society, request they keep it. As an Individual I would say destroy it.
     
  5. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    And there, if I may say so, is a perfect encapsulation of the quandary.

    No, not a breath of sarcasm or cynicism. I mean it.
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,599
    Thanks Received:
    5,914
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,031
    Yup, which should win out? The good of the society? Or the right of the individual? I suspect push come to shove I would eventually side with society, as the DNA does NOT , by its existance, do anything to anyone. Unless one can provide evidence of false matches or of poor science the database does nothing simply by existing.

    However the logic should not be that having the data base will catch criminals. That assumes guilt. The logic should be that it excludes innocents. If one can keep finger prints one should be able to keep DNA.
     
  7. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    I think you've summed it up pretty damn well. I hope there's a legislator, somewhere, reading this. If not, then cut and paste and forward.
     
  8. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    Why does the government need that information?

    Power and control.
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,599
    Thanks Received:
    5,914
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,031
    Government has a responsibility to protect society. Are you going to argue they have no right to fingerprints as well? Exactly how does one find criminals with out tools like these? Exactly what "right" is violated if you are no criminal? Criminals do NOT have the right to use our own laws and freedoms to avoid being caught. No one that has not committed a crime has any worry about finger prints of DNA in the hands of a just and good government. If the Government is not those things then they are not going to care what you think anyway.
     
  10. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,300
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,307
    Someone should tell them that a microchip implanted into the forehead or the right hand for ALL European citizens would be much better in the long run. Perhaps Obama can propose that to his European friends.
     

Share This Page