KissMy
Free Breast Exam
Did we subsidize ethanol because we taxed it 45 cents per gallon less than gasoline at the pump?
Yes or No?
Yes or No?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did we subsidize ethanol because we taxed it 23 cents per gallon less than gasoline at the pump?
Yes or No?
Let's back up a bit... ethanol replaced methanol. There was no issue with methanol other than the fact that the Agriculture industry needed it out of the picture before they could institute their ethanol fraud.
Next, initial EPA testing revealed that ethanol blends exceeded then-existing limits. So, rather than adjust the blending or formula the EPA re-wrote emission standards to accomodate ethanol blended fuels.
Then came the blending mandate which guaranteed a market for the product.
Then it was exposed that ethanol plants spew a host of pollutants.
Then Agriculture fought for a mandated 20% blend rather than the current 10%.
Yadda yadda yadda. Is there no end to this bullshit?
Oh ok LOL. I figured you were gonna stomp on us with facts and figs.
Like someone else mentioned, ag production is definitely subsidized and corn is the feedstock.