Did voter fraud swing the election?

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Jul 5, 2004
13,399
1,706
245
Exclusive: Joseph Farah presents evidence of illegal voting, contributions, intimidation

Contrary to popular opinion, I am not a “conspiracy theorist.”

I live in the real world – always have. I’ve been a journalist who goes where the facts lead him all my life – unlike most of my colleagues whose “facts” are predetermined by their ideology.

I understand Barack Obama and Bill Ayers because I was one of them early in my life. I even met Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda in the old days. I admired them. If Obama had been old enough during the 1960s and 1970s, I probably would have run into him, too.

If anyone has a balanced approach to the realities of political life in America, it’s me. I’ve looked at life from both sides. I know the arguments of the other side and can still spout them before most of today’s practitioners of so-called “progressive” thought can.

I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement represented so ably today by Obama is this: “By any means necessary …” It was first articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, “Dirty Hands.” But it became popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.

What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means. It means violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying, stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie “sins” are appropriate means of furthering the cause.

Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the reigning ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?

There is no doubt in my mind.

And that’s why stealing the vote is not only an acceptable practice by these people, it is a moral imperative in their twisted worldview.

Am I suggesting that the recent presidential election was stolen through voter fraud and manipulation?

Without a doubt.

Do I have evidence?

Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence to show that it was committed by one side in the election in various ways. And I am convinced that at least 5 percent of the Democratic vote can be attributed to fraud – illegal voters, illegal campaign contributions, rigged balloting, intimidation at the polls, you name it.

Here’s just some of the evidence for the skeptical:

•In September, the Columbus Dispatch in Ohio reported this sad and ugly news: “More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote. In two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible. Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90 percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent. In a close presidential election where every vote might count, which ones to count might become paramount on Election Day – and in possible legal battles afterward.” The Dispatch asked Ohio’s chief elections official, Secretary of State Jon Husted, what could be done about this problem. His answer? Not enough. Nine months ago, he asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder for a personal meeting to discuss how to balance seemingly conflicting federal laws so he could pare Ohio’s dirty voter list without removing truly eligible voters. Holder’s office never even bothered to reply – to either Husted or the newspaper. What does that tell you? It tells me voter fraud is and was an important tactic in re-electing Holder’s boss and Democrats throughout the country. Anyway, we all know how Ohio voted.

•How about Michigan – Romney’s home state? How did Obama win such a resounding victory when the polls showed the two candidates in a virtual tie? And how is it that Obama won by 9 points while Democrats suffered a string of defeats down the entire state ballot? For instance, Republicans maintained control of both the state House and the Supreme Court, while Democrats lost three ballot propositions.

cont.
Did voter fraud swing the election?
 
The only ones who needed to cheat to win were the republicans.
 
Last edited:

you're insane....that's the goal of every election against an incumbant...

You dolt! He said it in 2010. Which means the GOP's plan for TWO whole years was to work against the POTUS and anything he was trying to do. If you can't see that this "strategery" was seen as working against the betterment of the country by now, then I cannot help you.
 
The only ones who needed to cheat to win were the republicans.


X2, the GOP were committing voter fraud left and right and now the FBI is getting involved.

Who knows how much more the Obama win would have been if not for all the GOP fraud.
 
The only ones who needed to cheat to win were the republicans.

why....because it takes a cheat to cheat a cheater.....?

No because they were always the underdog in this election. It is not possible to cheat and win by the very comfortable margin Obama did but if it makes it easier to accept the loss then go right on believing you were all cheated, anything to avoid the hell of critically looking at the republicans, their massive flaws and rapidly shrinking base.
 
Do I have evidence?

Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence…

Which might be fine for conservative blogs and message boards.

But irrelevant if attempting to make a case for voter ‘fraud.’

Not only must evidence be documented and objective, not anecdotal, but it must also be proven that ‘fraud’ is so wind-spread as to actually effect the outcome of a given election.
 
I think pretty much everybody accepts that Barry won the presidency in a crooked manner.

Oh well, the assholes who allowed him into power can eat shit as the world crumbles around them. I would be hard pressed to feed a democrat, if there was a shortage of food.
 

you're insane....that's the goal of every election against an incumbant...

You dolt! He said it in 2010. Which means the GOP's plan for TWO whole years was to work against the POTUS and anything he was trying to do. If you can't see that this "strategery" was seen as working against the betterment of the country by now, then I cannot help you.

don't be stupid....working against a Marxist who purposely pushed Obamacare upon 60% of UNWILLING Americans was someone to NOT reelect....and BO started his campaign from day one of his first term....and if you think BO was someone who really tried to work with others you got to wake up from your dreams....
 
Do I have evidence?

Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence…

Which might be fine for conservative blogs and message boards.

But irrelevant if attempting to make a case for voter ‘fraud.’

Not only must evidence be documented and objective, not anecdotal, but it must also be proven that ‘fraud’ is so wind-spread as to actually effect the outcome of a given election.

so that's why Holder refused to investigate......the complaints came from conservatives......?
 
What did Obama do that hasnt been done before by both parties?

Why can't we focus on why WE lost instead of why obama won?

I fear we're destined to repeat the same mistakes
 

Forum List

Back
Top