Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

[daveman]

I oppose voter fraud in all forms and cases.

That's why common sense safeguards, such as voter ID, are so important.

There is no voter fraud.

Then 113 people were convicted of...what?

 

[daveman]

Attention! Attention!
Dumbfuck right-wingers,
Pencils down and eyes to the front,
You are wasting our time and resources on something
that has occured only 10 times since 2000.​

New Nationwide Study of Election Fraud Since 2000
Finds Just 10 Cases of In-Person Voter Fraud

A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.

So knock this shit off! You're not doing the country any favors.

I repeat:

113 Minnesotans were convicted of voter fraud.

So your link is obvious horseshit.

Meanwhile, stop acting superior. You have no basis for it.

 

[Ernie S.]

I oppose voter fraud in all forms and cases.

That's why common sense safeguards, such as voter ID, are so important.

There is no voter fraud.

This is about disenfranchising poor people, and it's unconstitutional.

Look up the 24th Amendment and poll taxes.

Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2008 case Crawford v. Marion County Election Board ruled that an Indiana law that required voters to obtain and present picture identification such as a driver's license was constitutional because the Supreme Court found no substantial burden imposed on voters and preventing voter fraud was a valid governmental objective.[citation needed] The lawsuit continued in the 2010 case League of Women Voters, et al. v. Todd Rokita where the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that requiring photo identification for voting was within the legislature's power.[17][18]

Contradict yourself much?

 

[daveman]

I oppose voter fraud in all forms and cases.

That's why common sense safeguards, such as voter ID, are so important.

There is no voter fraud.

This is about disenfranchising poor people, and it's unconstitutional.

Look up the 24th Amendment and poll taxes.

Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2008 case Crawford v. Marion County Election Board ruled that an Indiana law that required voters to obtain and present picture identification such as a driver's license was constitutional because the Supreme Court found no substantial burden imposed on voters and preventing voter fraud was a valid governmental objective.[citation needed] The lawsuit continued in the 2010 case League of Women Voters, et al. v. Todd Rokita where the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that requiring photo identification for voting was within the legislature's power.[17][18]

Contradict yourself much?

Conservatives believe what they see.

Liberals see what they believe.

 

[kaz]

Attention! Attention!
Dumbfuck right-wingers,
Pencils down and eyes to the front,
You are wasting our time and resources on something
that has occured only 10 times since 2000.​

New Nationwide Study of Election Fraud Since 2000
Finds Just 10 Cases of In-Person Voter Fraud

A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.

So knock this shit off! You're not doing the country any favors.

I repeat:

113 Minnesotans were convicted of voter fraud.

So your link is obvious horseshit.

Meanwhile, stop acting superior. You have no basis for it.

And you're in favor of disenfranchising fraudulent voters? Isn't that unconstitutional?

The left actually think that the Bill of Rights mentions that anything the left doesn't like is Unconstitutional and anything they do like is fully Constitutional. I have a link on that, I'll find it and post it for you.

 

[daveman]

Attention! Attention!
Dumbfuck right-wingers,
Pencils down and eyes to the front,
You are wasting our time and resources on something
that has occured only 10 times since 2000.​

So knock this shit off! You're not doing the country any favors.

I repeat:

113 Minnesotans were convicted of voter fraud.

So your link is obvious horseshit.

Meanwhile, stop acting superior. You have no basis for it.

And you're in favor of disenfranchising fraudulent voters? Isn't that unconstitutional?

The left actually think that the Bill of Rights mentions that anything the left doesn't like is Unconstitutional and anything they do like is fully Constitutional. I have a link on that, I'll find it and post it for you.

I don't doubt it a bit. Explains their feelings on the Second Amendment.

 

[bripat9643]

Nothing wrong with showing voter ID.

Hell I voted last week and had to show my DL. No problem. Voted and went on my way.

You need ID for everything today. No reason a person can't get an ID to vote.

Common sense 101.

List of things you need to have a voter ID for:

1. Boarding an airplane
2. Writing a check
3. Cashing a check
4. Using a credit card
5. Driving a motor vehicle
6. Applying for a business license
7. Applying for permission to hold a protest or rally
8. Securing employment
9. Purchasing a house or real estate
10. Renting a domicile
11. Renting a motor vehicle
12. Purchasing a firearm (Includes BB guns)
13. Applying for a hunting license (waived for 16 and 17 year olds when their legal guardian provides a photo ID)
14. Applying for a fishing license (waived for 16 and 17 year olds when their legal guardian provides a photo ID)
15. Purchasing alcoholic beverages
16. Purchasing tobacco or products that contain nicotine
17. Purchasing a motor vehicle
18. Initial registration of a motor vehicle
19. Applying for a building permit
20. Receiving prescription medicine
21. Purchasing OTC medicine that contains pseudoephedrine
22. Serving on jury duty
23. Getting a bank account
24. Cash transactions of $5000.00 or greater
25. Sales tax exemption for people aged 80 and above​

And none of those things violate anyone's rights, but asking for an ID to vote does?

 

[Rozman]

Yes. Al Franken should not be a U.S. Senator. That Election was a blatant sham.

Someone found bags of ballots in some dudes car...
Oh and yeah they were mostly for Al Franken..

 

[8537]

THe best part of this thread? The OP claims it was his research.

 

[daveman]

THe best part of this thread? The OP claims it was his research.

You know what research is, right? Pulling data from multiple sources, performing analysis, and reaching a conclusion.

 

[Fordsflylow]

THe best part of this thread? The OP claims it was his research.

You know what research is, right? Pulling data from multiple sources, performing analysis, and reaching a conclusion.

YOU trying to lecture on this!?!

 

[daveman]

THe best part of this thread? The OP claims it was his research.

You know what research is, right? Pulling data from multiple sources, performing analysis, and reaching a conclusion.

YOU trying to lecture on this!?!

I know, it's rather pointless, isn't it? You bitterly cling to your ignorance and your hatred.

Just keep repeating "The Democrat won, and that's all that matters. The Democrat won, and that's all that matters."