Did The Entity Known As FOXNEWS Give Any Coverage To #MarchForOurLives?

[MarcATL]

If not, why not?

 

[theHawk]

LMGTFY


That was hard....

 

[Witchit]

If not, why not?

It doesn’t fit their storyline.

 

[Dale Smith]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

 

[Witchit]

 

[Witchit]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

 

[Dale Smith]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

Fabian socialists are trying to prevent ALL people, regardless of skin tint, to be allowed to protect themselves and their families...it's part of the communist agenda. I dare anyone here to watch these two videos.....

 

[Witchit]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

I don’t know. Why haven’t you marched? Obviously, this is weighing heavy on your mind.

 

[Kosh]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

When did the far left become Conservatives?

 

[Witchit]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

When did the far left become Conservatives?

Conservatives were in favor of slavery and tried to keep it. Liberals (as always) fought for what was right.

 

[Kosh]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

When did the far left become Conservatives?

Conservatives were in favor of slavery and tried to keep it. Liberals (as always) fought for what was right.

Yes the far left love political slavery as you support it without question or hesitation, so that must mean you are a Conservative.

 

[Witchit]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

When did the far left become Conservatives?

Conservatives were in favor of slavery and tried to keep it. Liberals (as always) fought for what was right.

Yes the far left love political slavery as you support it without question or hesitation, so that must mean you are a Conservative.

You seem to have lost your way.

"since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?"

 

[BULLDOG]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

Conservatives never would’ve allowed such a thing.

Fabian socialists are trying to prevent ALL people, regardless of skin tint, to be allowed to protect themselves and their families...it's part of the communist agenda. I dare anyone here to watch these two videos.....

Typical conspiracy theory nut. Misdirect from subject constantly.

 

[MarcATL]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

This march took place on Saturday gone.

Were you in support of it?

 

[BULLDOG]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

The march Saturday wasn't just for the most recent school shooting victims, or even just for all school shooting victims. It was for all who have suffered from gun violence. I know you won't, but you should look at the list of speakers, and their loss from gun violence that caused them to be on that stage. Your post is that of someone who doesn't know what he is talking about.

 

[Wry Catcher]

If not, why not?

They did, I didn't recognize the couple, but they did show the massive crowd and allow the speakers to have their say. But once that segment ended, they moved on to a totally different topic.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

The march Saturday wasn't just for the most recent school shooting victims, or even just for all school shooting victims. It was for all who have suffered from gun violence. I know you won't, but you should look at the list of speakers, and their loss from gun violence that caused them to be on that stage. Your post is that of someone who doesn't know what he is talking about.

is 400 more than 17

 

[BULLDOG]

How come there was never a march for the 400 Black kids per year who are killed in Chicago ?
Are White Liberals racist?

The march Saturday wasn't just for the most recent school shooting victims, or even just for all school shooting victims. It was for all who have suffered from gun violence. I know you won't, but you should look at the list of speakers, and their loss from gun violence that caused them to be on that stage. Your post is that of someone who doesn't know what he is talking about.

is 400 more than 17

Your point? Those 400 as well as all the others who have uselessly died from gun violence are the reason for the movement. Quit nit picking and trying to find something to discredit their integrity or their goals. It makes you look petty.

 

[Penelope]

If not, why not?

I don't own a TV and haven't since 2012 and even then, I didn't have cable so I didn't watch lamestream media....but I do have a question for you since the oppression and slavery of black folks remains such a hot topic. Do you believe that black slaves of the 1700's and 1800's would have remained slaves if they could have armed and defended themselves...or would they have simply accepted the shackles and chains that they had put up on them because the possibility of freedom came at too high a price?

Thoughts???

They were freed before they were allowed to have guns, so NO if they had been allowed guns they would of not been slaves. Maybe you read:
Colfax massacre - Wikipedia or the
Black Codes (United States) - Wikipedia