Did Pelosi Do Blackmail?

[Willys]

Pelosi implies she has undisclosed information an Gingrich then covers her filthy ass by re-stating it as public information. A desperate attempt at relativity. She speaks with a dirty tongue. I can only imagine she gags herself to sleep each morning.

 

[California Girl]

She should be in jail with the rest of congress and senate who has done insider trading period

True. So put your money where your mouth is GOP... don't put a DC insider into the White House. Stop supporting one of the guilty for President.

*Bows*

 

[freedombecki]

Pelosi implies she has undisclosed information an Gingrich then covers her filthy ass by re-stating it as public information. A desperate attempt at relativity. She speaks with a dirty tongue. I can only imagine she gags herself to sleep each morning.

The last person she may care to have in the White House is someone who can deal with her more justly than she ever would with him.

All those charges on Gingrich? Pretty hot air that were found to be baseless, and the one count was reversed when Gingrich left office and devoted all his time to exonerate himself from dirty trick falsetto charges made by the Democrats who aren't themselves adroit at getting things by listening to the American people, then making a judgment.

Why every charge brought against Newt was a phony charge and every one of them was dismissed.

The media has a vested interest in bringing strong conservatives down. Even after all charges were dismissed (including the 84th one that wasn't at first until all the facts were in), the media uses the Dan Rather excuse to lambast Gingrich... (I know it's true, I just can't produce the evidence, that's all).

Get a grip, folks. Gingrich was brought down by the Democrats for the same emotional reason they reasoned with Hillary who was way ahead of Obama to concede her votes to Obama. It was because they felt like it.

Democrats learned from the Florida vote which George W. Bush won, how to steal an election--you have to force precinct chairmen to "find" votes in excess of what the true polls say, which are obfuscated with believable player media polls that show a Democrat ahead, albeit they do not disclose their readership is 85% Democrat. If they know their candidate is behind by 10 % points, they just have to "find" 12 % in each voter district and get the media to publish a 10% higher poll than was established.

They know that after the vote, they will just caterwaul their way out of the little omerta lie, and that means that

The American people's votes are not being fairly counted in Omerta oath districts, and enough state elections can be thrown if the other side is sleeping while they're inventing votes for themselves.

So egregious is voter fraud, I think it should be punished with life imprisonment.

And blackmail? Same deal. We're up to here with Nancy Pelosi's blackmail and theft of tax money to set aside golden parachutes for members of her family. Her behavior is consistent with someone who is using FBI files to gain power over weak senators and congressmen, possibly picking morally weak candidates to start out with so you can get power over their secrets and the votes they have to do to maintain a public image of rightness demanded by the American public.

And they got away with it.

I'm tired of blackmail and frivolous lawsuits leveled by liars against conservatives for the

 

[freedombecki]

She should be in jail with the rest of congress and senate who has done insider trading period

True. So put your money where your mouth is GOP... don't put a DC insider into the White House. Stop supporting one of the guilty for President.

*Bows*

CG, Gingrich may have his faults, but he has been cleared of every false charge leveled against him that the DNC Spin room pretended was true, and the media has blatantly insured that you don't know it.

You are accepting a wrongful outcome of Gingrich's actual innocence of those charges and interpreting them as guilty, which is not true. He was cleared.

His marriage details were falsely reported also, and the media played the public like a cheap violin to have the truth suppressed.

If a man is innocent, then he is not guilty. Newt Gingrich proved he was innocent, and his one oversight, he corrected when his mistake was called to his attention. Not once did he deny his error, but it was not an impeachable offense.

Had he done one thing wrong, the Democrats would have impeached him and dragged the entire nation through the mud.

Trouble is, they knew he was innocent when they were doing their theatre on bad Gingrich.

Some theater in Washington is staged by famous thespians you see at all the Democrat galas. They coach the Democrats on how to make someone into a bad guy and keep him that way. The first thing producers do is make the bad guy of the movie kick a dog or a cat. That makes people hate him. Newt's cancerous wife? The divorce was decided before she got cancer. That detail was undisclosed by Newt's media/thespian detractors. They used his wife's cancer to make the bad guy kick the dog. Get it?

It's called dirty politics. And Omerta? That means you never, never admit your theater.

 

[Lumpy 1]

You mean three vicious vile scum, right?

why bother taking the nutter seriously. she's messed up in the head. look at her posts. the viciousness just oozes.

she and newtie are made for each other.

i am curious, though chica, where's your demand for "evidence" from the o/p's nuttiness about "blackmail"?

Mo chara, you know I rate Gingrich and Pelosi as pretty much equal... but I accept the fact that our congress - both sides - is so completely amoral that no evidence of illegal activities will be available... After all, Pelosi committed actual treason against this country - provable, factual, US Constitutionally defined treason... and nothing happened to her. Y'all seem to cut your own side slack for the behavior that you rant about from the other side.

Disclaimer: 'You' in the above post does not mean you as an individual. It means generally those who support corruption, and illegal behavior from either side.

Chica..Chica..Chica.......Mo Chara....

It's a circus and we're merely spectators..

...and should be glad to be so, it seems....

 

[California Girl]

She should be in jail with the rest of congress and senate who has done insider trading period

True. So put your money where your mouth is GOP... don't put a DC insider into the White House. Stop supporting one of the guilty for President.

*Bows*

CG, Gingrich may have his faults, but he has been cleared of every false charge leveled against him that the DNC Spin room pretended was true, and the media has blatantly insured that you don't know it.

You are accepting a wrongful outcome of Gingrich's actual innocence of those charges and interpreting them as guilty, which is not true. He was cleared.

His marriage details were falsely reported also, and the media played the public like a cheap violin to have the truth suppressed.

If a man is innocent, then he is not guilty. Newt Gingrich proved he was innocent, and his one oversight, he corrected when his mistake was called to his attention. Not once did he deny his error, but it was not an impeachable offense.

Had he done one thing wrong, the Democrats would have impeached him and dragged the entire nation through the mud.

Trouble is, they knew he was innocent when they were doing their theatre on bad Gingrich.

Some theater in Washington is staged by famous thespians you see at all the Democrat galas. They coach the Democrats on how to make someone into a bad guy and keep him that way. The first thing producers do is make the bad guy of the movie kick a dog or a cat. That makes people hate him. Newt's cancerous wife? The divorce was decided before she got cancer. That detail was undisclosed by Newt's media/thespian detractors. They used his wife's cancer to make the bad guy kick the dog. Get it?

It's called dirty politics. And Omerta? That means you never, never admit your theater.

I have not read any 'gossip' about his marriages. I have little interest in his personal life, other than a somewhat vague interest in his inability to keep his marriage vows.

Substantial amounts of Gingrich's wealth comes from insider trading. Because, apparently, congress do not have to abide by the laws that the rest of us do. You voted for these people - I have not. Therefore, I carry no responsibility that is the clusterfuck called congress. You support them - while they rob you - that is your choice. But they rob me too... and that pisses me off. I blame you (you in the generic - everyone who keeps these assholes in power kind of you).

Gingrich does have faults.... he's corrupt, amoral, self serving, arrogant, egotistical, dishonest.... I could go on but you get where I'm going with this, I'm sure.

You support these fucking bastards if that is your want. Just don't expect the rest of the country to blindly follow. Some of us are sick of your assclowns, and the other sides assclowns.

The GOP actually has a pretty decent candidate... one that is the epitome of what their party stands for.... and y'all 'hate' him because of his religion, his ability to compromise, his wealth (which he actually earned and didn't get by the corrupt means afforded to congress)... Him you dislike.... And you wonder why the Independents are a tad pissed? Seriously?

 

[Rozman]

What is the source of the OP link's information? Where and when did Pelosi say she would release confidential Ethics Committee records if Newt is nominated?

She said she had the dirt on Newt since she was part of the investigation
committee and mad a veiled threat if you will about releasing that info.
Link below....


Nancy Pelosi threatens to expose ethics committee investigation - National Conservative | Examiner.com

 

[McDowell's]

"Did Pelosi Do Blackmail?"

Maybe Sarah Palin knows.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Did Pelosi Commit Blackmail?

Illegal threats -- blackmail or extortion -- make for some of the baser tools left to the dreary, heartless grandees of leftism. They cannot persuade -- indeed, men like Obama do not even dare call themselves "liberal" to America -- so they use the same sort of "persuasion" that organized crime uses. Sometimes, like with House Democrat Leader Pelosi's recent comments about Gingrich, the familiar threat of exposure or of future injury, which Pelosi has doubtless rolled out many times behind closed doors, is simply stated to the world, as if this revolting behavior were perfectly proper

Why does Nancy Pelosi go unpunished? Does she do this all the time against other people to obtain her will over their conscience to get their House vote?

​

The American thinker author, Bruce Walker drew his own conclusion:

So what will happen to Pelosi now? She has completed the felony -- backtracking does not undo the crime. You know what will happen as well as I do: nothing at all. The ugly blackmail and extortion racket that would make us rage against private citizens makes us yawn when leftist politicians do it. As Hannah Arendt, the famous student of totalitarianism, might have described it, what Pelosi did to Gingrich has become to us the banality of evil.

This nation is starting to look like the petty partisan court of King George in 1776. This, of course, is not good for anybody in America, much less the middle class. I'm getting good and sick of Democrat blacklists.
​

She only extorted money from wineries then exploited them...

Among other unethical and tyrannical behavior of course.

 

[California Girl]

Did Pelosi Commit Blackmail?

Illegal threats -- blackmail or extortion -- make for some of the baser tools left to the dreary, heartless grandees of leftism. They cannot persuade -- indeed, men like Obama do not even dare call themselves "liberal" to America -- so they use the same sort of "persuasion" that organized crime uses. Sometimes, like with House Democrat Leader Pelosi's recent comments about Gingrich, the familiar threat of exposure or of future injury, which Pelosi has doubtless rolled out many times behind closed doors, is simply stated to the world, as if this revolting behavior were perfectly proper

Why does Nancy Pelosi go unpunished? Does she do this all the time against other people to obtain her will over their conscience to get their House vote?

​

The American thinker author, Bruce Walker drew his own conclusion:

So what will happen to Pelosi now? She has completed the felony -- backtracking does not undo the crime. You know what will happen as well as I do: nothing at all. The ugly blackmail and extortion racket that would make us rage against private citizens makes us yawn when leftist politicians do it. As Hannah Arendt, the famous student of totalitarianism, might have described it, what Pelosi did to Gingrich has become to us the banality of evil.

This nation is starting to look like the petty partisan court of King George in 1776. This, of course, is not good for anybody in America, much less the middle class. I'm getting good and sick of Democrat blacklists.
​

She only extorted money from wineries then exploited them...

Among other unethical and tyrannical behavior of course.

And committed treason (as defined within the Constitution). That's my favorite 'sin'.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Here we go: Pelosi Hints, Then Denies She Has Gingrich Secrets : NPR


She never threatened to actually release the records, but she sure did skate close to the edge:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7VHjYIcaII]Pelosi: Gingrich will never be president - YouTube[/ame]

Who said "conservative"-PARANOIA isn't amusing??!!!!

.

.

.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Did Pelosi Commit Blackmail?



Why does Nancy Pelosi go unpunished? Does she do this all the time against other people to obtain her will over their conscience to get their House vote?

​

The American thinker author, Bruce Walker drew his own conclusion:

This nation is starting to look like the petty partisan court of King George in 1776. This, of course, is not good for anybody in America, much less the middle class. I'm getting good and sick of Democrat blacklists.
​

She only extorted money from wineries then exploited them...

Among other unethical and tyrannical behavior of course.

And committed treason (as defined within the Constitution). That's my favorite 'sin'.

 

[AquaAthena]

Did Pelosi Commit Blackmail?

Illegal threats -- blackmail or extortion -- make for some of the baser tools left to the dreary, heartless grandees of leftism. They cannot persuade -- indeed, men like Obama do not even dare call themselves "liberal" to America -- so they use the same sort of "persuasion" that organized crime uses. Sometimes, like with House Democrat Leader Pelosi's recent comments about Gingrich, the familiar threat of exposure or of future injury, which Pelosi has doubtless rolled out many times behind closed doors, is simply stated to the world, as if this revolting behavior were perfectly proper

Why does Nancy Pelosi go unpunished? Does she do this all the time against other people to obtain her will over their conscience to get their House vote?

​

The American thinker author, Bruce Walker drew his own conclusion:

So what will happen to Pelosi now? She has completed the felony -- backtracking does not undo the crime. You know what will happen as well as I do: nothing at all. The ugly blackmail and extortion racket that would make us rage against private citizens makes us yawn when leftist politicians do it. As Hannah Arendt, the famous student of totalitarianism, might have described it, what Pelosi did to Gingrich has become to us the banality of evil.

This nation is starting to look like the petty partisan court of King George in 1776. This, of course, is not good for anybody in America, much less the middle class. I'm getting good and sick of Democrat blacklists.
​

I loved this partial response from Newt: "Frankly, I'd rather have her threaten me than endorse me, so I feel pretty good about it," Gingrich said. "If she has something, bring it out."

 

[The T]

She only extorted money from wineries then exploited them...

Among other unethical and tyrannical behavior of course.

And committed treason (as defined within the Constitution). That's my favorite 'sin'.

This should have happened with that gavel:

 

[g5000]

What is the source of the OP link's information? Where and when did Pelosi say she would release confidential Ethics Committee records if Newt is nominated?

Click on the top, underscored, blue letter title, and you will magically have your answer. I'm sure reading comp is a strength with you, but maybe you've never used a link on a computer page, sweetie?

You are the one with the reading comprehension problem. I was asking where The American Thinker got their information from.

And nowhere in the OP link (The American Thinker) does it say where and when Pelosi attempted to blackmail Gingrich. It just says she did. Since American Thinker is a whackjob site, I need to take more than their word for it.


My questions went right over your head.

But that's okay. I don't expect anyone who reads that website to be very bright, and I provided a more detailed link in my very next post. But I guess you didn't see that, either.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Did Pelosi Commit Blackmail?

Illegal threats -- blackmail or extortion -- make for some of the baser tools left to the dreary, heartless grandees of leftism. They cannot persuade -- indeed, men like Obama do not even dare call themselves "liberal" to America -- so they use the same sort of "persuasion" that organized crime uses. Sometimes, like with House Democrat Leader Pelosi's recent comments about Gingrich, the familiar threat of exposure or of future injury, which Pelosi has doubtless rolled out many times behind closed doors, is simply stated to the world, as if this revolting behavior were perfectly proper

Why does Nancy Pelosi go unpunished? Does she do this all the time against other people to obtain her will over their conscience to get their House vote?

​

The American thinker author, Bruce Walker drew his own conclusion:

So what will happen to Pelosi now? She has completed the felony -- backtracking does not undo the crime. You know what will happen as well as I do: nothing at all. The ugly blackmail and extortion racket that would make us rage against private citizens makes us yawn when leftist politicians do it. As Hannah Arendt, the famous student of totalitarianism, might have described it, what Pelosi did to Gingrich has become to us the banality of evil.

This nation is starting to look like the petty partisan court of King George in 1776. This, of course, is not good for anybody in America, much less the middle class. I'm getting good and sick of Democrat blacklists.
​

I loved this partial response from Newt: "Frankly, I'd rather have her threaten me than endorse me, so I feel pretty good about it," Gingrich said. "If she has something, bring it out."

....Especially when ya' KNOW he's SHITTIN' HIS PANTS!!!!!

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

[Mr.Nick]

And committed treason (as defined within the Constitution). That's my favorite 'sin'.

This should have happened with that gavel:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pipyvVQ6nX4]What really happened when Pelosi Hands the Gavel to the new speaker - YouTube[/ame]

Don't you love how it has gold bands??

It really shows how delusional she is...

Fuck that bitch...

People are struggling to put food on the table and that lunatic is walking around with a token gold plated gavel..

Shows how in tough she is with our problems..

Why not a diamond decorated gavel??

Maybe it would look nice with her expensive jewelry..

Of course this is one of the masterminds behind the idea of elitism..

What a bitch...

 

[freedombecki]

True. So put your money where your mouth is GOP... don't put a DC insider into the White House. Stop supporting one of the guilty for President.

*Bows*

CG, Gingrich may have his faults, but he has been cleared of every false charge leveled against him that the DNC Spin room pretended was true, and the media has blatantly insured that you don't know it.

You are accepting a wrongful outcome of Gingrich's actual innocence of those charges and interpreting them as guilty, which is not true. He was cleared.

His marriage details were falsely reported also, and the media played the public like a cheap violin to have the truth suppressed.

If a man is innocent, then he is not guilty. Newt Gingrich proved he was innocent, and his one oversight, he corrected when his mistake was called to his attention. Not once did he deny his error, but it was not an impeachable offense.

Had he done one thing wrong, the Democrats would have impeached him and dragged the entire nation through the mud.

Trouble is, they knew he was innocent when they were doing their theatre on bad Gingrich.

Some theater in Washington is staged by famous thespians you see at all the Democrat galas. They coach the Democrats on how to make someone into a bad guy and keep him that way. The first thing producers do is make the bad guy of the movie kick a dog or a cat. That makes people hate him. Newt's cancerous wife? The divorce was decided before she got cancer. That detail was undisclosed by Newt's media/thespian detractors. They used his wife's cancer to make the bad guy kick the dog. Get it?

It's called dirty politics. And Omerta? That means you never, never admit your theater.

I have not read any 'gossip' about his marriages. I have little interest in his personal life, other than a somewhat vague interest in his inability to keep his marriage vows.

Substantial amounts of Gingrich's wealth comes from insider trading. Because, apparently, congress do not have to abide by the laws that the rest of us do. You voted for these people - I have not. Therefore, I carry no responsibility that is the clusterfuck called congress. You support them - while they rob you - that is your choice. But they rob me too... and that pisses me off. I blame you (you in the generic - everyone who keeps these assholes in power kind of you).

Gingrich does have faults.... he's corrupt, amoral, self serving, arrogant, egotistical, dishonest.... I could go on but you get where I'm going with this, I'm sure.

You support these fucking bastards if that is your (sic*)want. Just don't expect the rest of the country to blindly follow. Some of us are sick of your assclowns, and the other sides assclowns.

The GOP actually has a pretty decent candidate... one that is the epitome of what their party stands for.... and y'all 'hate' him because of his religion, his ability to compromise, his wealth (which he actually earned and didn't get by the corrupt means afforded to congress)... Him you dislike.... And you wonder why the Independents are a tad pissed? Seriously?

*The word is spelled "wont."
You are grossing over me with allegations true of others. You've never seen any of my several posts defending a Mormon friend of mine?

You will never, never, never see me calling another American a "fucking bastard." American citizens historically get enough of that from the English, always have, at least since my family members arrived on the Mayflower.

However, since you deem yourself the righteous judge, I don't care if you call them whatever you like. Believe any printed detail that would cause you to call another American such slander you like. Do not believe you can cause me to believe misunderstood information.

I don't buy into the Hollyweird way of sanitizing criminal rapists to hold high office, while excoriating not such beautiful specimens as "fucking bastards."

So you bought the farm because your friends did. I have been reading newspapers and staying on top of the news since I was 10 years old. I know the current writers as to who's naughty and who's nice, by what they pass off to John Q. Public as tradition that never happened and ignore the truth as though they'd catch the plague from it.

I don't buy cheap thespian tricks performed by the press in concert with their idols of the DNC. If you do, it's not at my peril, because there was a day in this country when you read a newspaper, there was a 99% chance it was accurate. Today journalists slip in and out of clown mode, with one side of their mouth saying "believe me," and the other side saying "it was a joke, what's wrong with YOU don't you have a sense of humor." Feh! Nowadays you buy a Swedish pancake, and you get Swiss plastic yogurt dumped on it instead of lingonberry butter. hahahaha We live in interesting times.

I haven't made my mind up yet on who I will vote for for President, but after watching how callously Nancy Pelosi has ensured diversion of golden parachutes to her family members who need a half a billion in backup for marginal businesses, I'm thinking we need somebody who, through sad experience, has his apples in a row to fight off whatever further lying smarm is tossed his way by Nancy Pelosi and her choice of deliverers this week. Right now, she's in full panic mode and is probably kicking herself for letting a little truth slip out--not the truth she wants anybody to know about either, about her mobster genes that are squealing "blackmail, blackmail, blackmail...."

Anyway, after watching the former House Speaker mouthing a blackmail threat to one of her predecessors, I am thinking. Nice guys shouldn't be in the same ring with this evil dowager, or he will fail. Newt is an innocent man who has been theatricized with lies on his character but who can deal with her better than someone who did his homework on their false charges and after months, proved his innocence of their extreme and untimely calumny against him.

So I'm saying it depends, but I've decided down to two who I will cast a vote for when the primary comes to my state. Neither is my first choice, and either will have a headache ahead if he wins. Both are honorable men, and not the unmentionable names you have called them, the same as you accused me of saying anything bad about Mormons. That has never come from any keyboard or pen I ever used to form words and never will.

If, however, I find that the other candidate believes the lying smarm of the Democratic National Committee's fictitious account of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and uses a single word of their Party Platform to smear this man with, rest assured I will consider him a misinformed airhead, unfit to be President, and he will not get my vote.

You notice this one truth: Newt Gingrich was not impeached because he did not do anything to merit such a censure. The harsh words cast were words against pure invented Democrat theater and nothing more substantial that, as Gingrich was exonerated of every single last one of their false and calumnious claims, which they well knew was false and calumnious, which is nothing to write home about, believe me.

I'll be attending the next few debates on television. I will determine who is naughty and who is nice, and I won't be wrong. I've done my homework all my long and giving life.

 

[California Girl]

What is the source of the OP link's information? Where and when did Pelosi say she would release confidential Ethics Committee records if Newt is nominated?

Click on the top, underscored, blue letter title, and you will magically have your answer. I'm sure reading comp is a strength with you, but maybe you've never used a link on a computer page, sweetie?

Becky, he asked for the source for the information contained in your link. You responding by referring him to your link is not what he asked for.... he wants the actual source for the article. Not the fucking article... the source for the information in the article. It's a legitimate question.... albeit one that appears above your intellectual pay grade.

 

[g5000]

Why every charge brought against Newt was a phony charge and every one of them was dismissed.

You linked to an illiterate's rant, and this is supposed to convince us of what, exactly?

I see you had to reword the link's title since it actually says this:
Charges Against Newt Is Phony Democrat BS! « conservativetickler

Get a grip, folks. Gingrich was brought down by the Democrats for the same emotional reason they reasoned with Hillary who was way ahead of Obama to concede her votes to Obama. It was because they felt like it.

Gingrich was brought down by the Republicans, not the Democrats. The Democrats did not select who was Speaker, and they did not force Newt out. His fellow Republicans did.

The Dems are scum, but that is no excuse to not get your facts straight.

As for the charges that were dropped, "dropped charges" =/= "innocent". Newt repeatedly violated one of the laws, but was allowed to plea bargain that one away.


And while you all are ranting about Pelosi getting away with blackmail, which is not proven, the rant to which you linked shows just how hypocritical you are:

I am still supporting Newt until they prove he did something wrong and even then I might still support him.

Pretty much sums up Gingrich's supporters.