Did obama just throw the election?

Katzndogz

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2011
65,656
7,489
1,830
If he belives that jacking up food prices just before the election will benefit him that's just a misjudgment, but if he knows that skyrocketing food, on top of skyrocketing energy will doom his reelection he has to be doing it deliberately.

Examiner Editorial: To protect ethanol, Obama seeks to inflate meat prices | WashingtonExaminer.com

Obama's move only harms American consumers while protecting a corrupt federal program.

A drought is currently driving down corn production. The shortage of feed is forcing livestock producers to slaughter animals early, putting downward pressure on meat prices in the short run and guaranteeing shortages and higher prices next year. But nature is not the biggest factor in this crisis -- the government is. Specifically, the federal government's ethanol mandate, which requires that 13.2 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol be produced in 2012.

Thanks to the ethanol mandate, more than 40 percent of the nation's corn crop now goes into the production of a useless fuel that hardly anyone would buy if the government didn't require it. That's up from just 17 percent in 2005, before the mandate went into effect. Only 36 percent of the corn crop now goes for feed, and 24 percent goes for food.

To recap, government is driving up the cost of food, animal feed and gasoline, and Obama's solution is to drive up meat prices as well.

Instead of letting producers sell their meat on the open market at lower cost, the government will buy up that food causing prices to rise out of the means of most average people.
 
Maybe he will postpone it after he sees that it is not popular by people who want to eat. Then he can reinstate his policy AFTER the election :thup:

Like he is doing with the medicare advantage program
 
so the ethanol corn didn't dry up also?

The concept of supply didn't make it into your class did it?

The 40% doesn't change. The total amount of what corn is available is what changed. The less corn available for all purposes means that most of the corn produced goes for ethanol leaving little available for food.
 
Bush and the GOP Congress created a new special interest group in 2005 when they established the federal ethanol mandate. You have to ask yourself what Bush and the GOP Congress got from creating a new special interest group and centralized planning instead of sticking with a free market economy. Hmmm...

Because of that mandate, some businessmen invested in ethanol manufacturing. And that sector is now a part of our infrastructure. This means they will fight tooth and nail to keep their federally mandated supply chain intact.

Obama is triangulating. What will get him more votes? Preserving Bush's ethanol mandate or not preserving it.

Apparently he has decided keeping the ethanol special interest group happy is more beneficial to him, just like it was for Bush.

So much for free market economy vs. central planning.

We lose.
 
Last edited:
You can thank Iowa and the farmers for the change, they knew what they were doing when they got the states to push for ethanol. Try not to blame Obama for something he didn't do. Obama is not in control of the weather,and many farmers I live and work by are not selling off their cattle.
 
Bush and the GOP Congress created a new special interest group in 2005 when they established the federal ethanol mandate.

Because of that mandate, some businessmen invested in ethanol manufacturing. And that sector is now a part of our infrastructure. This means they will fight tooth and nail to keep their federally mandated supply chain intact.

Obama is triangulating. What will get him more votes? Preserving Bush's ethanol mandate or not preserving it.

Apparently he has decided keeping the ethanol special interest group happy is more beneficial to him, just like it was for Bush.

So much for free market economy vs. central planning.

We lose.

obama is both powerless and senseless and cannot determine a state of emergency which would lead the ordinary person to conclude that ethanol mandates put in place during record or even ordinary times are harmful right now.
 
so the ethanol corn didn't dry up also?

The concept of supply didn't make it into your class did it?

The 40% doesn't change. The total amount of what corn is available is what changed. The less corn available for all purposes means that most of the corn produced goes for ethanol leaving little available for food.

It is what the farmers wanted, and they have wanted to do it for a longtime. Do you hear the farmers bitching, no. So if you want try being a farmer, and not a bitcher.
 
Not only is obama going to keep the ethanol mandates in place, but he will also buy up the available food to drive up costs even further.
 
so the ethanol corn didn't dry up also?

The concept of supply didn't make it into your class did it?

The 40% doesn't change. The total amount of what corn is available is what changed. The less corn available for all purposes means that most of the corn produced goes for ethanol leaving little available for food.

It is what the farmers wanted, and they have wanted to do it for a longtime. Do you hear the farmers bitching, no. So if you want try being a farmer, and not a bitcher.

As a matter of fact, the entire article was about farmers bitching. The farmers didn't want this, the government said the farmers wanted this. Which is not the same thing.
 
He is buying food to help stablize the farmers in time of loss. Nothing new, but Oblama is bad for doing it.
The food will be given away through food banks and charities.
 
Bush and the GOP Congress created a new special interest group in 2005 when they established the federal ethanol mandate.

Because of that mandate, some businessmen invested in ethanol manufacturing. And that sector is now a part of our infrastructure. This means they will fight tooth and nail to keep their federally mandated supply chain intact.

Obama is triangulating. What will get him more votes? Preserving Bush's ethanol mandate or not preserving it.

Apparently he has decided keeping the ethanol special interest group happy is more beneficial to him, just like it was for Bush.

So much for free market economy vs. central planning.

We lose.

obama is both powerless and senseless and cannot determine a state of emergency which would lead the ordinary person to conclude that ethanol mandates put in place during record or even ordinary times are harmful right now.

Did Bush drop the ethanol mandate during the 2008 drought?

Nope.

Not even when Texas Governor Rick Perry asked him to.
 
He wants rioting in the streets and class warfare. That's what he was taught and that's what he believes in. Saul Alinsky 101. Anything he can do to divide the races he supports, but then "mouths" the complete opposite and the Lib fools buy into it.

The silver lining is that some of the youth are starting to realize what he is really about. Four years ago it was hope and change. Now they graduated and there are no jobs.

He is one bad apple and if he can spoil the whole bunch he will. Not a truthful bone in his body.

Don't be surprised if he has a few more tricks up his sleeve in order to not have to give up power. A false flag, martial law...incite a war with Iran hoping that people will not change presidents during a crisis.

This guy needs to be hauled out of the White House with the rest of the trash. He is in reality not a Democrat. He is just affiliated with that party. He is a Socialist bodrering on a Communist. It was what he was raised around and what he still believes in.

Dreams of his father...who was good for nothing. Like father, like son.
 
Last edited:
He is buying food to help stablize the farmers in time of loss. Nothing new, but Oblama is bad for doing it.
The food will be given away through food banks and charities.

Oh yay!! Then we'll all get to pay 3x what we're paying today. WTG Obama!!

(pssst, I saw this coming. If I can pay my electric bill, I have plenty of beef, chicken and pork frozen with my garden veggies.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top