Did Obama Actually Tell Media That Bad Weather & Earthquakes Caused All His Problems?

RunPerryRun

Member
Aug 4, 2011
172
7
16
So, THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK !!, Remember how some in the GOP compared that excuse to the excuses that caused the Obama recession? A Japan earthquake wont cause a world-wide economic collapse. We had our share of bad weather during the Clinton years,yet,we had a pretty good economy in the 90's. But with Obama,the stock market crash isn't his fault. It's Japans fault, and Al Gores fault for causing Global Warming !!! At least al gore invented the internet..give that man a Nobel Poop Prize!
 
So, THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK !!, Remember how some in the GOP compared that excuse to the excuses that caused the Obama recession? A Japan earthquake wont cause a world-wide economic collapse. We had our share of bad weather during the Clinton years,yet,we had a pretty good economy in the 90's. But with Obama,the stock market crash isn't his fault. It's Japans fault, and Al Gores fault for causing Global Warming !!! At least al gore invented the internet..give that man a Nobel Poop Prize!

How would we know, if you don't have the courtesy to cite the article you're talking about?!?!
 
i dont have a link,but comon! it was all over the news, blaming the japan earthquake for the 4 trillion he pissed off? thats like loaning a friend 500 dollars,then u lose ur job,cant pay him back,and blaming it on your mother.
 
i dont have a link,but comon! it was all over the news, blaming the japan earthquake for the 4 trillion he pissed off? thats like loaning a friend 500 dollars,then u lose ur job,cant pay him back,and blaming it on your mother.

NO, you come on!!! I don't believe there's a single article out there that says anything like the what you said in your post. PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
 
Again here you all are denying facts and pretending he said what he did not say.

Your hate will eat you alive
 
Again here you all are denying facts and pretending he said what he did not say.

Your hate will eat you alive

You would have experience with hate eating you alive.

So what facts are people denying today? Im not sure Ive seen any in this thread.
 
“Tea Party Downgrade”? They Can’t Possibly Sell That

The downgrading of U.S. debt is an extreme embarrassment for the government in general, and the Obama administration in particular. So the administration has reacted in the only way it knows: by denouncing Standard & Poors, and by blaming its political opponents, the supporters of the Tea Party, for the downgrade

Of the administration’s alternative theories, the most ludicrous is the claim that the Tea Party, the one group dedicated to doing something about the nation’s spending and debt crisis, is somehow to blame for it. Yet this is the theory that President Obama’s political adviser, David Axelrod, tried to sell on Face the Nation this morning:

Mr. Obama’s longtime political adviser, David Axelrod, made clear that Democrats would seek to brand the rating as a “Tea Party downgrade.” He said Mr. Obama had been willing to compromise on issues sacred to liberals by curbing spending on entitlements, but the deal foundered because “Republicans are having to respond to this very, very strident group that is pulling them away and believes that compromise is a dirty word. That is a prescription for failure.”

What is most ludicrous is the Democrats’ effort to distract attention from the fact that they controlled Congress from January 2007 until January 2011. The first Congress that had any ability to be influenced by the Tea Party movement has been in office for only six months. Do the Democrats seriously expect anyone to believe that S&P’s downgrade of U.S. debt arises out of something that Republican Congressmen have done in the last six months? We expect the Democrats to appeal to ignorance at all times, but this is ridiculous.


“Tea Party Downgrade”? They Can’t Possibly Sell That | Power Line
 
“Tea Party Downgrade”? They Can’t Possibly Sell That

The downgrading of U.S. debt is an extreme embarrassment for the government in general, and the Obama administration in particular. So the administration has reacted in the only way it knows: by denouncing Standard & Poors, and by blaming its political opponents, the supporters of the Tea Party, for the downgrade

Of the administration’s alternative theories, the most ludicrous is the claim that the Tea Party, the one group dedicated to doing something about the nation’s spending and debt crisis, is somehow to blame for it. Yet this is the theory that President Obama’s political adviser, David Axelrod, tried to sell on Face the Nation this morning:

Mr. Obama’s longtime political adviser, David Axelrod, made clear that Democrats would seek to brand the rating as a “Tea Party downgrade.” He said Mr. Obama had been willing to compromise on issues sacred to liberals by curbing spending on entitlements, but the deal foundered because “Republicans are having to respond to this very, very strident group that is pulling them away and believes that compromise is a dirty word. That is a prescription for failure.”

What is most ludicrous is the Democrats’ effort to distract attention from the fact that they controlled Congress from January 2007 until January 2011. The first Congress that had any ability to be influenced by the Tea Party movement has been in office for only six months. Do the Democrats seriously expect anyone to believe that S&P’s downgrade of U.S. debt arises out of something that Republican Congressmen have done in the last six months? We expect the Democrats to appeal to ignorance at all times, but this is ridiculous.


“Tea Party Downgrade”? They Can’t Possibly Sell That | Power Line

Don't see how it's ridiculous. The TPers in Congress turned down larger cuts to save their own political hides. They pledged allegience to a piece of paper other than the Constitution. We could have had a deficit deal in the 4-5 trillion ballpark instead of just 1. That sounds like people who are willing to sacrifice the country to their personal political ends.
 

Forum List

Back
Top