Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And burn those National Geographics while you're at it.
Besides which, I don't recall National Geographic ever having an article on oral sex.
Don't let the facts of the discussion get in the way of a whine, bode. Only person to mention burning books was you... a liberal. Wow.
Don't forget the new dictionaries list same sex marriage as a definition under "marriage"....we need to get rid of those too. Burn it along with "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss.
why don't you just put together a list of books you want to burn?
don't forget fahrenheit 451.
Besides which, I don't recall National Geographic ever having an article on oral sex.
LOL...obviously you are not aware that Nat'l Geo was most boys' first access to topless women.
Besides which, I don't recall National Geographic ever having an article on oral sex.
LOL...obviously you are not aware that Nat'l Geo was most boys' first access to topless women.
Besides which, I don't recall National Geographic ever having an article on oral sex.
LOL...obviously you are not aware that Nat'l Geo was most boys' first access to topless women.
So seeing topless women is oral sex now?
Kids these days have just too much information from just too many places.
My kids (15 & 12) are more aware of more things at their age than i was 20 years older.
Kids these days have just too much information from just too many places.
My kids (15 & 12) are more aware of more things at their age than i was 20 years older.
Such words are inappropreate for kindergarten children.
The best solution is to remove the books and have a special volume prepared for them that is more appropreate.
The Books can be reissued to high school students.
I don't really have a problem with this. Dictionary companies put out versions for younger children. Why are they using a college level dictionary?
Did I rep you already today? If not here it comes, great post.
More like responsible parents.Kids these days have just too much information from just too many places.
My kids (15 & 12) are more aware of more things at their age than i was 20 years older.
I agree with that. Tvs, cell phones, and the internet in their bedrooms . . . the whole world is there for their seeing and, imo, they are not ready for the whole world at that age. Too much, too soon.
We're the oddball parents who won't let our kids have a tv or computer in their room, who use the parental control options provided by Comcast, who look up books and movies before just randomly saying 'oh, it's PG-13, it's fine', and who refuse to let their kids get a cell phone until they can get a job and pay for it. I know, we're whack.
Verry good.Thats basically what RAVI said earlier and I agreed with her and you on this one.
Verry good.Thats basically what RAVI said earlier and I agreed with her and you on this one.
Some people in the thread have quite an odd view towards small children.
There is nothing 'prudish' with letting kids be kids, they don't need to know such things at such an age.
If they want to do that to their own kids, nobody is preventing them, but limit it to that, do it to your own kids, not yours or mine unless we agree.
Kids these days have just too much information from just too many places.
My kids (15 & 12) are more aware of more things at their age than i was 20 years older.
I agree with that. Tvs, cell phones, and the internet in their bedrooms . . . the whole world is there for their seeing and, imo, they are not ready for the whole world at that age. Too much, too soon.
We're the oddball parents who won't let our kids have a tv or computer in their room, who use the parental control options provided by Comcast, who look up books and movies before just randomly saying 'oh, it's PG-13, it's fine', and who refuse to let their kids get a cell phone until they can get a job and pay for it. I know, we're whack.
It's a freakin entry in a dictionary dude.Verry good.Thats basically what RAVI said earlier and I agreed with her and you on this one.
Some people in the thread have quite an odd view towards small children.
There is nothing 'prudish' with letting kids be kids, they don't need to know such things at such an age.
If they want to do that to their own kids, nobody is preventing them, but limit it to that, do it to your own kids, not yours or mine unless we agree.
It's a freakin entry in a dictionary dude.
Not many kinderkids are plowing through dictionaries.
The ONE parent that made the objection - her kid was 11.
You really think Miraim Webster in a classroom is going to pervert kids or something?
What part of do what you want to your kids and not mine escapes you my dear?It's a freakin entry in a dictionary dude.Verry good.Thats basically what RAVI said earlier and I agreed with her and you on this one.
Some people in the thread have quite an odd view towards small children.
There is nothing 'prudish' with letting kids be kids, they don't need to know such things at such an age.
If they want to do that to their own kids, nobody is preventing them, but limit it to that, do it to your own kids, not yours or mine unless we agree.
Not many kinderkids are plowing through dictionaries.
The ONE parent that made the objection - her kid was 11.
You really think Miraim Webster in a classroom is going to pervert kids or something?
