Dick Nixon did not end the vietnam war.

Um, it was the North Vietnamese who ended the war on April 30, 1975 when Saigon became Ho Chi Mihn City.

Um, you're a fucking idiot.

Some of us were adults and watched the events of April 1975, moron. You can, as you always do, try to rewrite history and continue to be perceived as a fool. Something you do quite well.

BTW, Nixon was VP when Dien Bien Phu fell and he was VP when the promise made at the Genevea Accords (1954) providing for free electons in Vietnam was violated by the forces North and South of the DMZ.
 
Um, it was the North Vietnamese who ended the war on April 30, 1975 when Saigon became Ho Chi Mihn City.

Um, you're a fucking idiot.

Some of us were adults and watched the events of April 1975, moron. You can, as you always do, try to rewrite history and continue to be perceived as a fool. Something you do quite well.

BTW, Nixon was VP when Dien Bien Phu fell and he was VP when the promise made at the Genevea Accords (1954) providing for free electons in Vietnam was violated by the forces North and South of the DMZ.

thats what YOU always do when you cant refute facts is try and rewrite history.as always you didnt read a single thing I posted.congrats.thank god there are not anwhere near as many trolls at other political message boards like this site attracts.as usual,you prove you dont know how to click on a link.lol.


this is what you have done with me obviously.:lol:
this message is hidden because 9/11 inside job is on your ignore list.

till you learn how to click on a link.you have no credibility.you obviously dont know how to do that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

either that or you have serious reading comprehension problems which is probably the actual case here.lol.

the fact that SLACKASS is thanking you,you should REALLY be worried about this post,that idiot trol ldefends ANY government kind of corruption no matter HOW absurd and ludicrous it is.He thinks they are NEVER wrong about anything.:lol: dont know why i posted that since you obviously have me on ignore.:lol:
 
Last edited:
Bastard Dick Nixon also sabatoged the paris peace talks in 1968 so he could get elected.

LBJ’s ‘X’ File on Nixon’s ‘Treason’ | Consortiumnews

here is one important paragraph in there that needs to be looked at.because Nixon did not end the war four years earlier than he could have.not only were 20,000 more murdered by him,but over 110,000 as well.

Before U.S. participation in the war was finally brought to a close in 1973 — on terms similar to what had been available to President Johnson in 1968 — a million more Vietnamese were estimated to have died. Those four years also cost the lives of an additional 20,763 U.S. soldiers, with 111,230 wounded.



To keep his Wall Street campaign funders, profiteering from the Vietnam War, Nixon committed treason ---- listen to Everett Dirksen agree with LBJ here:“This is treason (click here to listen) Dirksen's agreement, i.e. "this is treason" comes at about 4:25 of the tape.

This from the Election Treason thread;

It can never be known for sure if LBJ's peace initiative would have been successful, but LBJ's peace initiative was well on it's way to being successful when Nixon sold us down the (Mekong) river.

LBJ and Everett Dirksen were in bi-partisan agreement: Nixon committed treason and the Vietnam war continued for 8 years.

The next day, Oct. 29, [1968] national security adviser Walt Rostow received the first indication that Nixon might actually be coordinating with Thieu to sabotage the peace talks. Rostow’s brother, Eugene, who was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, wrote a memo about a tip from a source in New York who had spoken with “a member of the banking community” who was “very close to Nixon.”

The source said Wall Street bankers – at a working lunch to assess likely market trends and to decide where to invest – had been given inside information about the prospects for Vietnam peace and were told that Nixon was obstructing that outcome.

“The conversation was in the context of a professional discussion about the future of the financial markets in the near term,” Eugene Rostow wrote. “The speaker said he thought the prospects for a bombing halt or a cease-fire were dim, because Nixon was playing the problem … to block. …

“They would incite Saigon to be difficult, and Hanoi to wait. Part of his strategy was an expectation that an offensive would break out soon, that we would have to spend a great deal more (and incur more casualties) – a fact which would adversely affect the stock market and the bond market. NVN [North Vietnamese] offensive action was a definite element in their thinking about the future.”

In other words, Nixon’s friends on Wall Street were placing their financial bets based on the inside dope that Johnson’s peace initiative was doomed to fail. (In another document, Walt Rostow identified his brother’s source as Alexander Sachs, who was then on the board of Lehman Brothers.)
 
So we are supposed to accept that Nixon started the Vietnam war during the Kennedy-Johnson Administrations?

No wonder he though he could get away with the Watergate Coverup. I mean he already managed to pull this off without any consequences.

Nixon bombed cambodia to get everybodys attention away from the watergate scandal.Clinton did the same thing with the lewinsky scandal.

He bombed and invaded Cambodia because that's where the enemy was. Fighting a limited war with ridiculous rules of engagement from DC was one of the main reasons we were unsucessful.

Clinton never bombed Cambodia.
 
Um, it was the North Vietnamese who ended the war on April 30, 1975 when Saigon became Ho Chi Mihn City.

The cause was at the end of WWII, France wanted to return to colonial rule in SE Asia. Ho defeated them and America took over support for the government of the South. We also blocked a democratic election that would have unified the country because Ho was going to win. He had popular support across that nation.

geez people around here never read anything more than just the thread title I swear.:cuckoo:

Look, the American people may well have played a part in getting our troops out of Veitnam but that didn't end the war.
 
I will bite.

We got into Vietnam when JFK was president. Then LBJ escalated the war. By the time Dick got in the White House in '69, the Tet Offensive occurred and Nixon desperately seeked an exit. In 1973 he ordered that exit.

In 1960 he lost to JFK. In 1962 he lost in a run for CA Governor. He was a man without a political position when we entered Vietnam, yet he got us into Vietnam! :cuckoo:

Did the public vote on a withdrawal from Vietnam? Did I miss something! Nope it was the Big Dick that ordered it!

Jeezzuss Insider your conspiracy theories are getting worse and worse! You keep proving once again that you might be the most illogical poster here!

coming from a coward troll who cowardly runs off with his tail between his legs when he cant refute pesky facts the CIA was behind 9/11 and you have fallen for the most laughable conspiracy THEORY ever invented by the government that 19 muslins and bin laden were behind the attacks even thought they have failed to prove that,your one to talk on someone who has conspiracy theories that get worse and worse all the time.:rofl::lmao:

hey moron,you are obviously not aware how dick nixon sabotoged the paris peace talks and delayed the end of the war,the bastard COULD have ended the war in 69 had he wanted to but he let it go on.Him and Johnson were the REAL murderers of the 58.000 americans.

oh and he was forced to end up by the american people moron,had they not protested he would NEVER have ended it idiot.

i am impressed that you got ONE thing right though.LBJ was the president that esculated the war. Nixon did as well with his bombing of cambodia moron.:lmao:
 
Um, it was the North Vietnamese who ended the war on April 30, 1975 when Saigon became Ho Chi Mihn City.

The cause was at the end of WWII, France wanted to return to colonial rule in SE Asia. Ho defeated them and America took over support for the government of the South. We also blocked a democratic election that would have unified the country because Ho was going to win. He had popular support across that nation.

geez people around here never read anything more than just the thread title I swear.:cuckoo:

Look, the American people may well have played a part in getting our troops out of Veitnam but that didn't end the war.

come on I want intelligent posters to post here,not trolls.

Then post some intelligence.

We started off as Advisors in Nam

The number of advisers jumped from 800 to approx. 17,000 in the early 1960s (John F. Kennedy president). In '64, LBJ announced the NVC attacked the USN along the coast. By '65 - 80,000 American troops were in South Vietnam.

Nixon put an end to JFKs war asshole.

That help?



So we are supposed to accept that Nixon started the Vietnam war during the Kennedy-Johnson Administrations?

No wonder he though he could get away with the Watergate Coverup. I mean he already managed to pull this off without any consequences.

Nixon bombed cambodia to get everybodys attention away from the watergate scandal.Clinton did the same thing with the lewinsky scandal.

He bombed and invaded Cambodia because that's where the enemy was. Fighting a limited war with ridiculous rules of engagement from DC was one of the main reasons we were unsucessful.

Clinton never bombed Cambodia.

He murdered many innocent civilains,not the army fool.:blahblah:
 
Last edited:
come on I want intelligent posters to post here,not trolls.

Then post some intelligence.

We started off as Advisors in Nam

The number of advisers jumped from 800 to approx. 17,000 in the early 1960s (John F. Kennedy president). In '64, LBJ announced the NVC attacked the USN along the coast. By '65 - 80,000 American troops were in South Vietnam.

Nixon put an end to JFKs war asshole.

That help?

Uh no moron,Nixon never put an end to the war that asshole "LBJ" started.the american people did moron. thank god for them because if not from them,that bastard would have kept it going same way he delayed it before.:rolleyes:

all you did was prove FOR ME that Johnson started the war because Kennedy only increased ADVISORS,he never sent in combat troops.LBJ did fool.:rolleyes: again thank god for the american people ending the war that LBJ got started and Nixon expanded on.
 
So we are supposed to accept that Nixon started the Vietnam war during the Kennedy-Johnson Administrations?

No wonder he though he could get away with the Watergate Coverup. I mean he already managed to pull this off without any consequences.

wow you clearly have reading comprehension problems.LBJ started the war,Nixon just esculated what LBJ got started.BOTH murdering innocent civilains.
 
Um, it was the North Vietnamese who ended the war on April 30, 1975 when Saigon became Ho Chi Mihn City.

Um, you're a fucking idiot.

Some of us were adults and watched the events of April 1975, moron. You can, as you always do, try to rewrite history and continue to be perceived as a fool. Something you do quite well.

BTW, Nixon was VP when Dien Bien Phu fell and he was VP when the promise made at the Genevea Accords (1954) providing for free electons in Vietnam was violated by the forces North and South of the DMZ.


this coming from a troll who believes in the magic bullet theory that oswald was the lone assassin.kinda hurts your credibility believing in magic bullets.
:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
Bastard Dick Nixon also sabatoged the paris peace talks in 1968 so he could get elected.

LBJ’s ‘X’ File on Nixon’s ‘Treason’ | Consortiumnews

here is one important paragraph in there that needs to be looked at.because Nixon did not end the war four years earlier than he could have.not only were 20,000 more murdered by him,but over 110,000 as well.

Before U.S. participation in the war was finally brought to a close in 1973 — on terms similar to what had been available to President Johnson in 1968 — a million more Vietnamese were estimated to have died. Those four years also cost the lives of an additional 20,763 U.S. soldiers, with 111,230 wounded.



To keep his Wall Street campaign funders, profiteering from the Vietnam War, Nixon committed treason ---- listen to Everett Dirksen agree with LBJ here:“This is treason (click here to listen) Dirksen's agreement, i.e. "this is treason" comes at about 4:25 of the tape.

This from the Election Treason thread;

It can never be known for sure if LBJ's peace initiative would have been successful, but LBJ's peace initiative was well on it's way to being successful when Nixon sold us down the (Mekong) river.

LBJ and Everett Dirksen were in bi-partisan agreement: Nixon committed treason and the Vietnam war continued for 8 years.

The next day, Oct. 29, [1968] national security adviser Walt Rostow received the first indication that Nixon might actually be coordinating with Thieu to sabotage the peace talks. Rostow’s brother, Eugene, who was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, wrote a memo about a tip from a source in New York who had spoken with “a member of the banking community” who was “very close to Nixon.”

The source said Wall Street bankers – at a working lunch to assess likely market trends and to decide where to invest – had been given inside information about the prospects for Vietnam peace and were told that Nixon was obstructing that outcome.

“The conversation was in the context of a professional discussion about the future of the financial markets in the near term,” Eugene Rostow wrote. “The speaker said he thought the prospects for a bombing halt or a cease-fire were dim, because Nixon was playing the problem … to block. …

“They would incite Saigon to be difficult, and Hanoi to wait. Part of his strategy was an expectation that an offensive would break out soon, that we would have to spend a great deal more (and incur more casualties) – a fact which would adversely affect the stock market and the bond market. NVN [North Vietnamese] offensive action was a definite element in their thinking about the future.”

In other words, Nixon’s friends on Wall Street were placing their financial bets based on the inside dope that Johnson’s peace initiative was doomed to fail. (In another document, Walt Rostow identified his brother’s source as Alexander Sachs, who was then on the board of Lehman Brothers.)


the ONE POSTER here that knows the REAL facts.:udaman::thup:
 
come on I want intelligent posters to post here,not trolls.

Then post some intelligence.

We started off as Advisors in Nam

The number of advisers jumped from 800 to approx. 17,000 in the early 1960s (John F. Kennedy president). In '64, LBJ announced the NVC attacked the USN along the coast. By '65 - 80,000 American troops were in South Vietnam.

Nixon put an end to JFKs war asshole.

That help?

Uh no moron,Nixon never put an end to the war that asshole "LBJ" started.the american people did moron. thank god for them because if not from them,that bastard would have kept it going same way he delayed it before.:rolleyes:

all you did was prove FOR ME that Johnson started the war because Kennedy only increased ADVISORS,he never sent in combat troops.LBJ did fool.:rolleyes: again thank god for the american people ending the war that LBJ got started and Nixon expanded on.

There were many people who were culpable for blame, from IKE and and the CIA to Nixon; & dozens of mistakes along the way: rigged elections, an authoritarian prime minister, McCarthyism and peace talks in Paris which were slowed by arguments on the shape of the table as young Americans died.

RWers ought not try to rewrite this history, some of us lived through this fiasco and will forever remember those as living breathing friends and Team Mates who came home in a body bag.
 
Pres. Truman gets credit for being first Pres. to get us into Nam. He allowed and approved French to return and continue control of Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam as colonies.
the war escalated under each following Pres. Nixon gets blamed for losing the war because of failed Paris Peace Agreement. Ultimately it was Ford and Congress who abandoned Nam when funds were cut off and air support denied.
 
Why on earth did you resurrect a five year old thread that was stupid in 2012?
 

Forum List

Back
Top