Desperate Dems

Because the likelyhood of McCain dying in office is equal if not less that Obama suddenly gaining the experience to be president within the first 4 years...
It's either..take a chance at McCain dying and getting Palin...
or get Obama for sure....
I would rather take the chance of him dying..


I'd love to see you explain that statistically. I realize it made your non-sequiter weaner hard but gimme a break.
 
They can be concerned but don't complain when the American public show concern about how many packs of cigs Obama smoked a day and for how long, how much cocaine he did and what his risk for heart attack is. On top of that don't be upset if the American public is concerned about his radical associations, who paid for his Harvard education and who hired him for the Annenberg Challenge. Let it all hang out and the let the chips fall where they may.

HAHAHA!

oh yea.. it's the SMOKING now, right? As opposed to Mccain's CANCER and broken body thanks to vietnam? ok, dude. whatever you say. You REALLY want to make the cocaine argument still? Despite the fucking nasal vacuum BUSH had? :lol: NOW it's radical associations too! :lol:



Again, it's pretty obvious that you don't have anything to swiftboat this time around and are looking for ANYTHING that you hope will stick. Good luck with that.

:thup:
 
I'd love to see you explain that statistically. I realize it made your non-sequiter weaner hard but gimme a break.

It's common sense.

Do you really want to argue Obama's experience vs. McCain's?

that is..unless you are talking about drugs..

but basically, you said "weaner" therefore all credibility has been lost..
 
And by the way if Obama is so concerned about McCain's health why did he choose a VP who has already had two aneurysms?

uh, because a healthy OBAMA will never have to worry about dieing of OLD AGE in office?


:lol:
 
It's common sense.

Do you really want to argue Obama's experience vs. McCain's?

that is..unless you are talking about drugs..

but basically, you said "weaner" therefore all credibility has been lost..

no, it's not common anything. You said "Because the likelyhood of McCain dying in office is equal if not less that Obama suddenly gaining the experience to be president within the first 4 years..." Who the hell is talking about experience all of a sudden? Nice strawman you are hiding behind. Indeed, I WOULD stack up someone who is not entrenched in the same ole politics for 30+ years, dude. Trust me, I care about the credibility to give my posts. :lol:
 
no, it's not common anything. You said "Because the likelyhood of McCain dying in office is equal if not less that Obama suddenly gaining the experience to be president within the first 4 years..." Who the hell is talking about experience all of a sudden? Nice strawman you are hiding behind. Indeed, I WOULD stack up someone who is not entrenched in the same ole politics for 30+ years, dude. Trust me, I care about the credibility to give my posts. :lol:


I'm talking about experience.

The point was McCains chances of dying are equal to if not less than Obama gaining the experience to run this country.

Like I said..

I prefer to take a chance with McCain's health than with Obama's lack of experience..

and no, you would entrench someone barely in any politics up against someone with 30+ years....dude
 
They can attack McCain all they want. Like the attacks on Palin, they will fail. Besides, if something happens to McCain, Palin is more than qualified to take over and will do a phenominal job.

This is more desperation from the whacko left.
 
I'm talking about experience.

The point was McCains chances of dying are equal to if not less than Obama gaining the experience to run this country.

Like I said..

I prefer to take a chance with McCain's health than with Obama's lack of experience..

and no, you would entrench someone barely in any politics up against someone with 30+ years....dude

Experience worries you, but you'd put someone into office who doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is?

Experience worries you, but you voted for someone twice who failed at every job he ever did?

I'd say judgment is more meaningful than experience. And putting someone into office who's clearly no longer equipped for the job along with someone who isn't smart enough for me to hire as a paralegal and you talk about Obama?

lol... you have warped sensibilities.
 
They can attack McCain all they want. Like the attacks on Palin, they will fail. Besides, if something happens to McCain, Palin is more than qualified to take over and will do a phenominal job.

This is more desperation from the whacko left.

Palin's a loony toon...

that bong's bruising your brain.
 
I'm talking about experience.
The point was McCains chances of dying are equal to if not less than Obama gaining the experience to run this country.
Like I said..
I prefer to take a chance with McCain's health than with Obama's lack of experience..
and no, you would entrench someone barely in any politics up against someone with 30+ years....dude

yea.. NOW you are.. After I said I would love to see you statistically prove your assertion. So, please.. show me how you come to statistically see an equal chance of Mccain dying in office and Obama gaining experience.. Please.. I'd love to see the math.

What you prefer is your prerogative. Now, the rest of us...

and yes, read my post again... I'll say it slower: I'd, stack up BARACK OBAMA, a man WITHOUT a foot in 20th century politics, against an old man who about as close to change as another lap around the ferris wheel.
 
Experience worries you, but you'd put someone into office who doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is?

Experience worries you, but you voted for someone twice who failed at every job he ever did?

I'd say judgment is more meaningful than experience. And putting someone into office who's clearly no longer equipped for the job along with someone who isn't smart enough for me to hire as a paralegal and you talk about Obama?

lol... you have warped sensibilities.


experience worries me more than "zomg he's old he might die"


not to mention

your argument is " Obama is experienced because Bush sux"


go drink some of that bush bashing kool aid while trying to justify Obama's lack of inexperience
 
yea.. NOW you are.. After I said I would love to see you statistically prove your assertion. So, please.. show me how you come to statistically see an equal chance of Mccain dying in office and Obama gaining experience.. Please.. I'd love to see the math.

What you prefer is your prerogative. Now, the rest of us...

and yes, read my post again... I'll say it slower: I'd, stack up BARACK OBAMA, a man WITHOUT a foot in 20th century politics, against an old man who about as close to change as another lap around the ferris wheel.

Show me McCain's statistical chances of dying in office because he's old and I will give you the math...

I assume you have it considering that is your main argument why not to vote for him..
 
Two liberal groups – one of them directed by a brother of the Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean – will begin running a graphic attack advertisement Thursday morning raising questions about Senator John McCain’s health.

Full story here

Age Discrimination. Aren't the Democrats supposed to be against that?
 
experience worries me more than "zomg he's old he might die"


not to mention

your argument is " Obama is experienced because Bush sux"


go drink some of that bush bashing kool aid while trying to justify Obama's lack of inexperience

No. You need to read with comprehension.

McCain's age is only a worry because of the poor choice he made for VP. If he picked someone with more on the ball, it wouldn't be as troubling.

Sarah Palin is an ambitious politician without a lot of intellect, but with some native intelligence and a lot of chutzpah, who also unfortunately thinks it's ok to be protected from "witches" by a laying on of hands.... thinks creationism belongs alongside science and is antichoice. She has no knowledge of foreign policy... which is inexcusable for a politics buff... much less a VP candidate and possible president.

She's not equipped to be president... I'd go so far as to say she'd be a disaster... and THAT is why I laugh at you for blindly being a bot.

BTW, historically 20% of VP's become president... McCain should be ashamed of giving the country the finger.
 
Show me McCain's statistical chances of dying in office because he's old and I will give you the math...

I assume you have it considering that is your main argument why not to vote for him..

I wasn't the one making absolutely retarded projections about the relative statistics of either. Please, show me your work too, dude. Bookies and casinos EVERYWHERE would love to know your formula.

:lol:

And no, his age isn't what is keeping me from voting for him. His "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb iran" mentality is, hopefully, nothing more than a vietnam flashback. However, since he chose a laughable VP the concern of his health is a viable concern in this election.


Now, again.. don't forget to include your math..
 
You do know a large part of this country is Christian and believes in both good and evil.

But go ahead...

see what happens when that is used as a valid argument against McCain's candidacy...
 
You do know a large part of this country is Christian and believes in both good and evil.

But go ahead...

see what happens when that is used as a valid argument against McCain's candidacy...


uh, good and evil as in "LET"S GET OUR HOLY WAR ON"?

yea.. you keep thinking that. 2000 came and went with no fireworks of the return of christ. Iran is not some satanic little puppet in your laughable race to the end of the world. Thankfully, your concept of "good and evil" is not universal in this nation.


math please..
 
I wasn't the one making absolutely retarded projections about the relative statistics of either. Please, show me your work too, dude. Bookies and casinos EVERYWHERE would love to know your formula.

:lol:

And no, his age isn't what is keeping me from voting for him. His "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb iran" mentality is, hopefully, nothing more than a vietnam flashback. However, since he chose a laughable VP the concern of his health is a viable concern in this election.


Now, again.. don't forget to include your math..


Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran is bad but

Invade Invade Invade a nuclear Pakistan is alright?

not to mention they both are nearly identical on Iran 'now'...one uses diplomacy and a stick...the other diplomacy and a gun

if Palin is laughable as a vp what does that make Obama? Hilary was more experienced...you dems and your silly excuses for candidates...

oh and here's my math

First you must agree that McCain has more experience than Obama in politics..if not then the math wont work for you.

ok.

If Obama is elected it is a 100% chance he has less experience than McCain.
not saying how much...just less.

If McCain is elected it is a "5. The likelihood that a 72-year-old nonsmoking male will die before reaching age 76, then, is 100 minus this number, or 13.167 percent. "

How to follow Politico's math - Alexander Burns - Politico.com

therefore...

McCain has around a 13% chance of dying before his first term is up.
Obama has a 100% chance of being less experienced than McCain.
 
uh, good and evil as in "LET"S GET OUR HOLY WAR ON"?

yea.. you keep thinking that. 2000 came and went with no fireworks of the return of christ. Iran is not some satanic little puppet in your laughable race to the end of the world. Thankfully, your concept of "good and evil" is not universal in this nation.


math please..

no good and evil as in believing in the evils of witchcraft.

even if you don't believe it's real...people still do it.

please don't start on the whole "holy war" argument.

i'll save you time.

Christianity, like all religion is tainted by those who act in ways that do not reflect that of the intended faith.

Those crusaders were not Christians in my book, rather people claiming to be to justify their wrongdoings.

plus, Obama has already said he will not rule out military action against Iran...just like McCain...goes both ways

stay on topic...
 

Forum List

Back
Top