Dershowitz explains why Trump Jr. Meeting with Russians is a nothing burger...

[2aguy]

Nothing Trump Jr. did was illegal......and every politician in this country would have done the same thing...

Alan Dershowitz: Don Jr. Didn't Break Any Laws

Dershowitz explained; “If the material was obtained unlawfully, you prosecute, if you can, the people who obtain the material. But there is a First Amendment right of a candidate to use information. You can’t include information under the campaign finance law. That would be unconstitutional.”



"It is inconceivable that anybody who has any knowledge of the Constitution or of American history, would argue that a private citizen, by securing information for a campaign from somebody who may be a surrogate of the government, has committed treason," the professor argued. "It is so ahistorical and so contrary to what the law is that we ought to stop talking about it because we're miseducating the American people. We're miseducating young people..."

On the bright side, he pointed out that young people are suddenly very interested in learning about the Constitution.

 

[fncceo]

Pretty sure at this point they're not interested in what a Jewish lawyer has to say ... especially one like Dershowitz, who supports Israel.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

This stuff is gonna go on for AT LEAST 2 full years. They need to work up their base to get them too the polls in 2018.

They also want to dispirit the opposition from voting, otherwise they just lose more seats in the Congress and Senate.

 

[deanrd]

And now, for the GOP, espionage is a nothing burger.
An attack on our democratic system is a nothing burger.
Using stolen information is a nothing burger.
Felonious hacking - nothing burger.

Course, coming from a man who lies continuously to the American people, who stiffed his own workers, who stole from children with cancer, it's all a nothing burger.

No wonder the GOP wants him a a role model. They share the same values and morals.

 

[2aguy]

And now, for the GOP, espionage is a nothing burger.
An attack on our democratic system is a nothing burger.
Using stolen information is a nothing burger.
Felonious hacking - nothing burger.

Course, coming from a man who lies continuously to the American people, who stiffed his own workers, who stole from children with cancer, it's all a nothing burger.

No wonder the GOP wants him a a role model. They share the same values and morals.

Yeah......try showing us how Trump did any of this....It would make your post more relevant....

 

[fncceo]

espionage is a nothing burger.

Espionage isn't a nothing burger ... It's cool as balls ...

 

[xband]

Nothing Trump Jr. did was illegal......and every politician in this country would have done the same thing...

Alan Dershowitz: Don Jr. Didn't Break Any Laws

Dershowitz explained; “If the material was obtained unlawfully, you prosecute, if you can, the people who obtain the material. But there is a First Amendment right of a candidate to use information. You can’t include information under the campaign finance law. That would be unconstitutional.”



"It is inconceivable that anybody who has any knowledge of the Constitution or of American history, would argue that a private citizen, by securing information for a campaign from somebody who may be a surrogate of the government, has committed treason," the professor argued. "It is so ahistorical and so contrary to what the law is that we ought to stop talking about it because we're miseducating the American people. We're miseducating young people..."

On the bright side, he pointed out that young people are suddenly very interested in learning about the Constitution.

Alan Dershowitz is a constitutional scholar but because he was educated in an Ivy League School of Law gets little if any respect from the far right. The far right is crazier than the far left. I steer my car between the ditches.

 

[xband]

Nothing Trump Jr. did was illegal......and every politician in this country would have done the same thing...

Alan Dershowitz: Don Jr. Didn't Break Any Laws

Dershowitz explained; “If the material was obtained unlawfully, you prosecute, if you can, the people who obtain the material. But there is a First Amendment right of a candidate to use information. You can’t include information under the campaign finance law. That would be unconstitutional.”



"It is inconceivable that anybody who has any knowledge of the Constitution or of American history, would argue that a private citizen, by securing information for a campaign from somebody who may be a surrogate of the government, has committed treason," the professor argued. "It is so ahistorical and so contrary to what the law is that we ought to stop talking about it because we're miseducating the American people. We're miseducating young people..."

On the bright side, he pointed out that young people are suddenly very interested in learning about the Constitution.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Pretty sure at this point they're not interested in what a Jewish lawyer has to say ... especially one like Dershowitz, who supports Israel.

Yeah! Fuck people who support a democracy! Damn Israel haters take their dumps in every thread.

 

[xband]

Pretty sure at this point they're not interested in what a Jewish lawyer has to say ... especially one like Dershowitz, who supports Israel.

Yeah! Fuck people who support a democracy! Damn Israel haters take their dumps in every thread.

No place in the Constitution does the word Democracy appear even once. The word Republic is there more than twice. Democracy was what destroyed ancient Athens.

 

[sealybobo]

Nothing Trump Jr. did was illegal......and every politician in this country would have done the same thing...

Alan Dershowitz: Don Jr. Didn't Break Any Laws

Dershowitz explained; “If the material was obtained unlawfully, you prosecute, if you can, the people who obtain the material. But there is a First Amendment right of a candidate to use information. You can’t include information under the campaign finance law. That would be unconstitutional.”



"It is inconceivable that anybody who has any knowledge of the Constitution or of American history, would argue that a private citizen, by securing information for a campaign from somebody who may be a surrogate of the government, has committed treason," the professor argued. "It is so ahistorical and so contrary to what the law is that we ought to stop talking about it because we're miseducating the American people. We're miseducating young people..."

On the bright side, he pointed out that young people are suddenly very interested in learning about the Constitution.

Now we know trump did collude with russia. You agree?